Will the ADF purchase the A400M to replace the C130H?
 

http://www.asdnews.com/data_news/ID24464_600.jpg

A400M Begins Ground Tests Prior to First Flight
The purpose of these ground tests is to verify that all aircraft systems, powerplant and flight test instrumentation work properly

(November 12, 2009) -- The first Airbus Military A400M has been handed over to the Airbus "Flight Test" organisation on 12 November, paving the way to the beginning of the various ground tests which are to be performed before the aircraft takes to the air before year end. The purpose of these ground tests is to verify that all aircraft systems, powerplant and flight test instrumentation work properly, in order to ensure a safe First Flight, and subsequently an efficient flight test campaign.

The ground tests include static tests and engine run-ups during which the interaction between all systems, the powerplant and the aircraft is controlled and validated. The correct operation of the telemetry system which will be subsequently used to follow the flights during the development campaign will also be checked during these ground test campaign. Following satisfactory completion of the static tests, the first taxi runs can start. These begin with low speed taxis (up to 60 kts) and brakings, and are to be followed by high speed trials with a rejected take-off at about 120 kts. During these trials, the behaviour of all systems, and the turboprop engines, as well as the reaction of the aircraft to braking and lateral control, is thoroughly checked.

After each trial a thorough analysis of the findings as well as the status of the aircraft will determine when the next trial will take place, leading to a first Take-Off before year end.

Source : European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company EADS N.V. (Paris: EAD.PA)

Does the 'H' need replacing just yet?

My concern would be Ronnie over-extending himself integrating new types in the next 10 years:
- A330
- Super Hornet
- F35
- Wedgetail
- P8

plus moving the Bou's work around other platforms (including the 'H') unless a replacement is found in short order (which would be yet another new type coming in).

Replacing the 'H' would not of itself be a problem, but maybe there's a limit to how many big projects should be run simultaneously?

In that pic it appears as if props 1 & 3 rotate one way while props 2 & 4 rotate the other way. Is this correct or have I had too much sparkling brown?

Regards,
BH.

Bullethead
 

Well spotted.Airbus explanation

HERE

+ J Models
 

My money would be on more Js. Much easier to integrate. Not for some time though...

Thanks TWT,

Looks like it's well worth doing. I'm guessing the counter rotation of the props is achieved through using different gearboxes to drive the props rather than having two completely different power plants.

Regards,
BH.

French?
 

Surely not. The government could never by French again after the MRH90 and Tiger they couldn't be bitten again?

Just remember the ADF has very little control over what platform it gets, it's all up to the government of the day.

Less than two weeks ago South Africa saw the the light and cancelled its order for eight. Surely the ADF is not dumb enough to jump in where the South Africans have bailed out? Perhaps the ADF is being induced to take over the cancelled eight? I hope not. Oz fighting forces deserve better than to be lumbered with someone else's rejects.

http://www.pprune.org/african-aviati...cancelled.html

Are they real engines, or just props? :}

Okay, okay...I'll go quietly...:(

S70IP: The government could never by French again after the MRH90 and Tiger they couldn't be bitten again?

You left the Mirage out of that sentence.

The RAAF were learning about Mirage perculiarities (that the French had not passed on) throughout its RAAF service, even in the last years of Mirage ops in Australia.

Nice jet though.

What about the A330 MRTT, it's French so I guess the government really hasn't learnt.

No.

Choice bro'!

You forget the largest and most secret department in Canberra, one that's been operating at 110% capacity for decades now... the Department of Let's Go Overseas And Buy a Failed Scheme."

We've been doing this for years now, and not just in Defence. There seems to be this overriding belief in Canberra that, having seen a system fail when tried overeas, we can get it right.

No.

The current government has decided to replace 12 x C-130H's with 2 x C-130J's.

The Caribou will be replaced with 10 x LTFW aircraft (type not decided yet - C-27J?)

Was in the White Paper I believe. Here is an old press release from some car auto-electrician :E when the initial decision was made:

Airlift Capability downgrade.. sorry, "New capability"

While there are 12 H models on the books I understand that there are only 4 remaining in service with 8 quietly retired.

Why go for the A400 when they have a heavy airlifter in the C17. More J models the way to go.

TH

They have been progressively drawing the fleet down but not to the extent you suggest (according to my now aged knowledge)

Other way round me thinks...8 good ones and 4 parked. :ok:

Apologies for thread drift
 

C-17 Heavy Airlifter Simulator Delivered

(November 18, 2009) -- Greg Combet, the Minister for Defence Personnel, Materiel and Science, and Shayne Neumann, the Federal Member for Blair, announced today that the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) will benefit from the achievement of a major training milestone for Australia's C-17 Heavy Airlift Capability.

"The C-17 Simulator commissioning marks the start of aircrew training in Australia. From January 2010, RAAF C-17 pilots will undertake their training at Amberley instead of travelling to the United States (US)," said Mr Combet.

"The attainment of the C-17 simulator is another successful outcome for the C-17 Heavy Air Lift Project and further testimony to the cooperative relationship between the Department of Defence, the United States Air Force and its contractors."

The Federal Member for Blair, Shayne Neumann, attended the ceremony accepting the simulator at RAAF Base Amberley.

"We are very proud as locals that the C-17 simulator will provide training outcomes which greatly enhance the support to Australian Defence Force operations and humanitarian relief efforts being provided by the RAAF C-17 fleet," said Mr Neumann.

"The Simulator is a replica of the C-17 cockpit and provides realistic training conditions for all C-17 missions. Operational conditions can be generated at a wide variety of airfields in Australia and overseas," said Mr Combet.

The Boeing Company built the Simulator in the US and installed it in the purpose-built facility at RAAF Base Amberley in Queensland, constructed by John Holland Group. The Simulator itself was transported to Amberley using two C-17 aircraft.

The Simulator is the centerpiece of the C-17 Training System. The complete system includes a Maintenance Trainer to be delivered in 2010 and a Cargo Compartment Trainer to be delivered in 2013. Australia is the only foreign C-17 operator to own a Simulator. The other 20 Simulators are owned and operated by the United States Air Force.

Source : MoD Australia

Wa-hey! Now we can simulate an airlift capability! :}:ouch::suspect:

Wonder if other forces will use the RAAF sim for recurrents in the future, i.e Qatar or UK!