PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   Merged: A330 safety beatup on SUNDAY (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/392507-merged-a330-safety-beatup-sunday.html)

TURIN 18th Oct 2009 11:01

I assume this troll is aware of the 777 uncommanded climb events from a couple of years back. From memory they were Adiru related too.

Still, lets not let the facts get in the way of a good story. :yuk:

Arnold E 18th Oct 2009 11:04

Well come on Flyboy, I can see you are on line, how is Tim today:cool:

HotDog 18th Oct 2009 11:07

I doubt if Flyboy is a media troll. If he was, I would hope his grammar and spelling would be somewhat superior.:rolleyes:

YPJT 18th Oct 2009 13:26

Tim / Flyboy or whoever has been played by TT like a finely tuned fiddle.

Mate, you've probably got more chance of getting yourself T-Boned by a drunk driver on the way to the airport than something untoward going wrong on your flight.

topend3 18th Oct 2009 13:41

despite their best efforts they still included a boeing in the footage - looked like a 737 on finals...

also loved the bit about pilots avoiding flying airbus types...

what a pile of crap...

Ozzie Mozzie 18th Oct 2009 15:01

FlyBoy737800 - Pardon the French
 
http://i641.photobucket.com/albums/u.../20041103h.jpg

lowerlobe 18th Oct 2009 22:14


At end of report it said that QANTAS has new procedures to follow if a uncommanded dive re occurs

Like to know what they are and how the pilots that fly these "aircrafts" feel.

Are they in the back of their mind consciously/subconsciously waiting for it to dive.
Doesn't sound like someone fishing at all......:yuk:

I'm sure a lot of journo's would like to get that story.....:E

Two newbies suddenly turn up when this story breaks...mmmmm

blueloo 18th Oct 2009 22:44

Whilst a good channel 7 beat up, there is unfortunatly some truth to the underlying story. Ie that there is some fault which hasnt been removed and/or positively identified. At this stage airbus has coped the flack because of it design ie computers have ultimate control, but as we have seen boeings can be affected too, just that the pilot has a bit more control in the washup.

ConfigFull 19th Oct 2009 00:53

The biggest issue that arises from all this is Channel 7's inability to report anything worth watching regarding aviation. Anyone see their attempt at the "overseas" student language issues at Moorabbin about a year ago?

That time they had a great chance to highlight some of the issues going on at GAAPs and failed (they couldn't even get some of the radio transmissions' subtitles correct); and this time they should've reported on something news-worthy like the EK incident at Tulla and fatigue (an actual problem) but I dare say no one would be interested because it didn't involve everyone's favourite scapegoat.

Anyone know any history behind the 'pilot' who's writing that ridiculous book that was mentioned in the show? I would look it up but don't want to give his confidence/arrogance any more of a boost by adding to his website hit count.

Blueloo, yes Airbus desiged the FBW technology in general terms but they don't make the ADIRUs - the one that suffered the 'erroneous data' issue was made by Northrop Grumman. Refer http://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/...70_interim.pdf page 57 - also note the corrective action which now sits in paper form in every applicable A330/340's QRHs.

Bit of research from the scaremongers wouldn't go astray - even the rudimentary information mentioned above isn't hard to find.

captaintunedog777 19th Oct 2009 01:38

Unfortunately once again not only does the media portray Australians as mindless fools but so do you amateurs on this web site. Boeing is bettter, no Airbus is blah blah bah. One horriffic commercial accident to date.

I am appalled and embarrassed by the moronic ramblings posted here.

yssy.ymel 19th Oct 2009 01:39

I sort of tend to agree with bluloo. It's definitely shoddy reporting, but what else would you expect from that bastion of quality "journalism".

The core question should have been "Is there an undiagnosed fault in aircraft where computers have the final say in how an aircraft should fly?". It shouldn't single out Airbus or Boeing as both manufacturers have aircraft that are FBW, both manufacturers have had issues related to garbage ADIRU inputs with, in one case catastrophic results, the rest just soiled trousers.

That is a thread that has raged on PPRuNe for a while now, and will probably continue on for some time. Pointing out one manufacturer doesn't make sense when the type of technology is shared.

I for one don't like it when a sophisticated AP just goes "Biddup, biddup, biddup. Your plane buddy, I am out of here". :}

Keg 19th Oct 2009 02:32


..also loved the bit about pilots avoiding flying airbus types...
That's actually true but not for any of the reasons stated in the program! :ok:

mcgrath50 19th Oct 2009 07:19

Keg
 
Then why are they avoiding it?

AN Flyer 19th Oct 2009 08:36

Quim,


The Qantas 330's are safe. But I wouldn't fly in the Jetstar 330's for quids!http://images.ibsrv.net/ibsrv/res/sr...ies/thumbs.gif
Other than the coat of paint and the Int J class config on the QF op 332 versus the "borrowed" QF 332 in Jetstar W class / QF Dom J class config with leather covers, what's the difference? :)

As far as I can tell from casual observation at the gate, all the J* 330's are in mainline rego, with mainline engineers doing the pushbacks, and mainline engineers doing the line maintenance when the birds are parked - or has something changed?

donpizmeov 19th Oct 2009 08:36

I think what Keg is referring to, is that a lot of QF pilots like flying antique aircraft, so are more willing to stay on the 767 and 747 then pop off to the bus. There cant be many more years left in these classic aircraft so why not get as much time on the museum pieces as you can before they are taken to the desert and scrapped. Then there will be no choice but to move onto something modern.

Are Jetstar taking all the 787s? It would be nice to see a modern era Boeing in QF colours. Lets just hope it flies some day.:E

Don

ZEEBEE 19th Oct 2009 08:38

What a disgrace
 
I believe that the program was an absolute disgrace and was shoddy as hell even by Sunday on Seven's standards (if that's possible). :*

The repeated reference to the Air France crash as an A330 when it was an A340 suggests either normal media inaccuracy or deliberate attempt to associate and add credence to a very poorly thought out story.

What peeves me about these programs is a total disregard of the other side of the argument.. ie How many accidents have the system prevented?
Well, we may never know, because of course, they are never documented.

As for the poor sods chucked against the ceiling, not a nice feeling, but was there ANY suggestion that there plight might have been alleviated had they have had their SEAT BELT fastened ??? No, that might have diluted the DRAMA. :mad::yuk:

The defense by FlyBoy (terrific name , by the way,NOT) aka Tim ham reeks of association with the program that I would be doing my level best to distance myself from. :*:*

Capt Kremin 19th Oct 2009 08:51

err ZeeBee?... actually it was an A330.

Nice rant though... ;)

ditch handle 19th Oct 2009 08:56


As for the poor sods chucked against the ceiling, not a nice feeling, but was there ANY suggestion that there plight might have been alleviated had they have had their SEAT BELT fastened ??? No, that might have diluted the DRAMA.
Cabin crew suffered multiple injuries.

One poor fellow requiring twin full knee reconstructions and still off work as far as I know.

adsyj 19th Oct 2009 09:41

Thats a touch embarrassing ZeeBee I hope you get back to edit your post soon.

Gregm001 19th Oct 2009 10:16

Actually me thinks ZEEBEE is getting the Emirates Melbourne incident confused with the Air France disappearance.


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:09.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.