PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   Emirates Incident at Melbourne. (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/366824-emirates-incident-melbourne.html)

flyingfox 21st Mar 2009 06:22

Emirates Incident at Melbourne.
 
An Emirate A340 was involved in a serious incident on take off out of Melbourne Australia last night. See thread on Pprune.
http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/3...strike-ml.html

aussiepax 21st Mar 2009 23:00

see thread in rumours and news
http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/3...rike-ml-5.html

WhoFlungDung 23rd Mar 2009 03:33

Very Very Scary
 
This is probably the most serious incident to occur in Australia for a long time. A heavily laden (pax and fuel) wide body aircraft is still on the ground at the upwind end of a 12000ft runway, suffers a tail strike during rotation, takes out part of the ILS and some lighting. As someone else said, this is spine chilling. If indeed the crew were flown out of Australia within hours of the event, then someone should be asking some very serious questions. :(

IFF 3rd Apr 2009 20:44

EMIRATES Airlines has confirmed that the pilot and co-pilot in charge of the Airbus A345 that was damaged when it scraped its tail on takeoff from Melbourne on March 20 have resigned.

Last paragraph of totally unrelated story

Qantas takes on Singapore Airlines by slashing $1000 off a return ticket to London | Travel News | News.com.au

somniferous 3rd Apr 2009 23:05

Resigned or jumped before pushed.... probably the same thing really.

Does anyone know what nationality they are?

blackbandit 3rd Apr 2009 23:22

nationality
 
Well they wouldn't be locals, they would get a medal for saving the aircraft and pax!

distracted cockroach 4th Apr 2009 00:21

Is the aircraft still in Melbourne? Looked for it the other day and couldn't see it anywhere.

Dr Zoydberg 4th Apr 2009 02:34

The aircraft is currently in the John Holland hanger.

UnderneathTheRadar 15th Dec 2011 23:17

ATSB report out
 
Investigation: AO-2009-012 - Tailstrike and runway overrun - Airbus A340-541, A6-ERG, Melbourne Airport, Victoria, 20 March 2009

UTR

Capn Bloggs 15th Dec 2011 23:24

Anybody else find the links in the PDF are farked? For example, Analysis > Summary takes me to the cover page.

breakfastburrito 16th Dec 2011 00:07

Bloggs, I was able to Right Click > Save As on the pdf link to the final report. Here's an alternate link if you still can't get it:AO-2009-012

Capn Bloggs 16th Dec 2011 03:40

BB, thanks, still no good. I should have said I'm referring to the bookmark links.

neville_nobody 17th Dec 2011 11:43

Interesting to note that fatigue was mentioned in that Herald Sun article one of the pilots did after the incident claiming he had difficulty sleeping and had done alot of flying leading up to the accident however the ATSB reports says that fatigue was not a contributing factor.

From the ATSB report:


Consistent with the results from the operator’s examination of the operating crew’s fatigue, the location of both operational crew members’ effectiveness towards the top of the Fatigue Avoidance Scheduling Tool effectiveness range indicated that they were not significantly impaired by fatigue at the time of the accident.

That assessment was also supported by the crew providing data that indicated they both had probably obtained sufficient rest during their layover in Melbourne. The layover time was greater than 36 hours and the captain and first officer reported that they did not feel unusually fatigued when they commenced their duty period.

The operating captain reported having 6 hours sleep in the 24 hours prior to the occurrence and 16 hours sleep in the 48 hours prior to the occurrence. The operating first officer reported having 8 hours sleep in the previous 24 hours and 12 hours sleep in the previous 48 hours.
This is what was said in the Herald Sun article:

n multiple interviews conducted with the Sunday Herald Sun over a period of weeks, the pilot who has left Dubai with his family and returned to his home country in Europe also revealed: HE had slept for only 3 1/2 hours in the 24 hours before the flight taking off on March 20. THE brush with death upset him so badly he had not slept for four days after the accident.
Not quite sure if I would classify 6 hours rest in the previous 24 as 'adequate' rest. However it may be the case they he didn't want to be to well rested before departure as he was taking the first break.

EK_Bus Driver 18th Dec 2011 03:08

EK Tail Strike
 
No Nev, the ULR "Rest Plan" in the OM-C calls for the Relief Crew to be on first break. The Operating Crew have to wait about 6 hours, so it's assumed they would have been "well rested". Have done that pairing many times both as Relief and Operating, I have been unable to get what I consider proper rest before the Flight despite following the recommended Rest Strategy on more than a few occasions, so I know how he felt. Before anyone says they should have gone 'sick'. There is no point, also no point in filing an A.S.R. as it falls on deaf ears in the "Bouncy Castle". Retribution and punitive action will be the only response. Not surprising as this Company is investing heavily in sponsored Corporate events and employing lots of Aussies. More Political than I imagined. If you don't believe me... ask any EK Pilot how they feel about fatigue, previous and current Rostering / Leave allocation practices.

Not a fatigue issue?? The Crew Members Resigned???

My Ar%e!
:yuk:

framer 19th Dec 2011 07:39


Aviation safety investigations & reports

Investigation title
Flight planning - Airbus A380, VH-OQE, Los Angeles International Airport, USA, 8 October 2011



Summary


The aircraft took off without the correct speeds programmed into the flight management computer.
The investigation is continuing.
Anyone know if this is another example of incorrect performance data getting through the routine SOP cross checks of several crew? Or is it more likely hat the loadsheet was wrong so therefore the calculated speeds were wrong?
If it is the former it makes me wonder if we get 50 close calls for every tailstrike/ overrun?

KRUSTY 34 19th Dec 2011 09:42

You know EK_Bus Driver, if what you say is true re: fatigue, then with regard to those doing the investigating I can draw but one of 2 conclusions.....

They are incompetant. Or,

They are corrupt! :sad:

EK_Bus Driver 19th Dec 2011 21:05

EK Tail Strike
 
Yeh I hear ya Krusty. I wonder if the ATSB are getting the "full" picture from our Clowns (no pun intended) in head office in DXB. For example a Temporary Revision that was issued on LPC performance AFTER the "Incident" (read - near disaster!), was very subtly backdated to make it effective, not many of our bleary eyed drivers picked up on it. I'm not implying ATSB are incompetent, I know some ex Mil Colleagues in there that are great guys.

I still stand firm on Fatigue as a contributing factor. It is a huge problem in this Airline.

Cheers

gobbledock 19th Dec 2011 21:29

Yeah, and the crew members 'resigned' Asian style - Caught a flight home from BNE the next night, when they arrived at H/O their 'resignation letters' had been drafted for them which they had to sign, and their families had already been moved out of EK accomodation...nice work. Did somebody forget to teach EK the benefits of a 'just culture'?

EK_Bus Driver 19th Dec 2011 22:43

Crew "Resigned"
 
You are correct Gobbledock. Had they not "resigned", certain threats were made in a rather assertive manner, such as loss of Provident Scheme for one. The main "aggressor" (a certain talking Horse) has since left the Company to improve his Golf Handicap.

KRUSTY 34 20th Dec 2011 00:15

Thanks EK_Bus Driver. I did cast a wide net regarding the ATSB, but it makes me mad when the "Authorities" in this country fail to get it right, for whatever the reason. I know the ATSB is only manadated to investigate, but where's CASA in all of this? Oh that's right, CASA (in this case it seems) are TOOTHLESS! And do you know why? Because they choose to be. Australia came to within a bee's whisker of what would have been it's greatest airline disaster, and what have CASA done? ZIP! I mean Good God Almighty. Any responsible regulator would've banned EK from flying into OZ untill a full and transparent investigation was done.

You only need to look at the outcome of the Senate inquiry to see the smoking gun of incompetance and corruption. The last thing these guys want is an investigation into any of the fatigue management systems. Systems that are only in place because they favour the selected airline operators. CAO 48 may not be perfect, but it does at least provide protection. Protection that has been earned (sometimes in blood) over decades of operations. CASA's relationship with the "Big End of Town" is nothing short of scandalous, and it only goes to highlight CASA's failure to act on the latent failures in the system. Failures that they, as an organisation, have allowed to develope! :ugh:

As gobbledock keeps saying... TICK TOCK! :sad:


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:40.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.