PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   2006 Qantas Cadets (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/259545-2006-qantas-cadets.html)

thrills 12th Jan 2007 04:41

2006 Qantas Cadets
 
Hi all, just wondering if anyone can tell me where the level two (I assume the level one cadets are still completing their training) 2006 Qantas cadets have endend up? I have heard there are a couple still waiting to be placed??? Sounds like money has been pissed up against the wall if you have to wait months for a job....:ok: good work

I have also heard that there are a few of them who have been employed by Brindabella, mac air, and Sunstate. Can anyone verify this for me?

Happy new year to all of you

WynSock 13th Jan 2007 03:18


Originally Posted by thrills (Post 3063900)
I have also heard that there are a few of them who have been employed by Brindabella, mac air, and Sunstate. Can anyone verify this for me?

Cant verify that but I would have thought it a bit odd to put a 200 hr cadet in the right seat of a Dash. That is not a safe place to learn how to fly...

I think the dash8 travelling public would probably agree.

:hmm:

ABX 13th Jan 2007 05:07

WynSock,


I would have thought it a bit odd to put a 200 hr cadet in the right seat of a Dash.
I was under the impression that this is exactly what they do.:}

Maybe thrills can confirm?

neville_nobody 13th Jan 2007 06:03


Originally Posted by Riding the Goat (Post 3065792)
Skippers have QF cadets in the right seat of their Dash's.

Whats not normal about that. 200hr pilots in the UK are in the right seat of 737 and bigger!


What's not normal is that in Australia there is no need to do it. The reason that airlines do is that QF is slipping them a few George Washingtons to take their cadet pilots.

In Europe and Asia 200hr co pilots are only there out of necessity as there is no alternative. However a few operaters are now starting to realise that having cadets is no such a great idea as they are now struggling to find people to qualify as direct entry captains.

kellykelpie 13th Jan 2007 08:44

I fly with cadets as FOs on the A320 and they are fantastic. I wish a lot more of our FOs were cadets.

That's not knocking the GA guys. My backgound is GA and I know how hard it is. But just like any good GA pilot, these guys know the books, have a great attitude and they can fly very well.

Puchatek 13th Jan 2007 08:56

200 hour cadets "learning to fly" in in the right seat? Holy Shi*, remind me not to fly Oconnors, Airnorth, Skippers, Pearl, National Jet, Ma*air, Jetstar and who knows who else in the coming months! Looks like it's Greyhound buses for me from now on:}

goodonyamate 13th Jan 2007 11:58

2006 Cadets...who's waiting?
Just thought I'd see how many Level 2 cadet applicants are waiting to hear either yay or nay or have already got "the phone call". Don't know about others but the wait is slowly sending me insane.

Oh and Puchatek, do you recognise this post from early 2006????

Sounds like someone might have missed out on the opportunity to be placed at some of these operators. Deary me.

Good luck in 'the big bad world of GA' as you put it, in the same thread. (Or in the bus driving industry - whatever you choose to do)
:D

Di_Vosh 13th Jan 2007 14:22

Erm..
 
Goodonyamate,

I think that Putachek was being sarcastic :hmm:

mattgitau 13th Jan 2007 15:27

Yep - I would much rather know that the F/O of any aircraft i was a passenger on had spent thousands of hours flying a C-182 in the middle of nowhere, because that would be so much more valuable than someone who had passed a Ground School, and Simulator course to obtain a Type Rating to operate a sophisticated Airliner to Airline Standard SoP's.............especially if we had to do a practice forced landing into a paddock somewhere!
Why do Australians think that they are superior to other parts of the world when it comes to the qualifications required to sit in the RHS of a modern Airliner. If you are trained to do the job - you can do it.
I dont see aircraft dropping out of the sky all over Europe because the 200hr F/O accidently switched the Fuel control Switch to off instead of pressing the cabin Crew call button!!!
I have flown in both parts of the world, and believe me.......the naivety of some of the contributors to this area of this sight never ceases to amaze me..........maybe there is a reason some of them havent yet made it into that elusive RHS........and it has nothing to do with how much money they are prepared to pay for a job.

R.Cruizo 13th Jan 2007 23:41

I too have spent time in Australia and overseas. In times of high work load it's an advantage to have an experienced Pilot in the right seat ; I'll take that choice anyday.

Nobody is knocking cadets!!! Everybody started their careers with 200hrs+.

I just think it's a bit rough QF spreading it's cadets throughout the industry and in many cases displacing others trying to work their way up. Fine if they want to do it with their own Regionals.

As mentioned previously on this thread, there is also the question of Command Upgrades. No easy task for the likes of Skippers, Smackair etc to upgrade someone with 3000hrs and 100hrs Command.They will still require either some experienced new hires or hire Direct Entry Captains.

In Europe, Asia etc Pilots straight out of flying school go straight into the right seat of a Saab 340, B737 etc because there are no other Pilots available; and with the proper trainning they do a very good job!

But in Australia we have such a large GA pool , there are plenty of guys and gals with some experience to choose from and put through the same Sim and line trainning.

Puchatek 14th Jan 2007 00:29

Dear oh dear oh dear.
goodonyamate, true my mind may be small but at least it :mad: works. FYI i was actually trying to express to wynsock and the like just how widespread cadets are in the industry with the various operators and so with just a hint of sarcasm that there's no hope for the travelling public now is there with guys in the RHS who apparently dont know what they are doing.
And please next time before you go and search my previous posts and then make a huge assumption to use as ammunition to share with everyone, perhaps read and re-read it to make sure you aren't going to make a fool of yourself:ok: BTW i did 'get in' and am still learning to fly with one of the above mentioned operators. Not far off solo now i think.

kegabeer 14th Jan 2007 11:05

and spare a thought for us all for when the MPL system of licensing gets going...:rolleyes: :ugh:

Puchatek 14th Jan 2007 12:52


Touchy touchy.....

No, not touchy at all. I just found it intriguing that you firstly misinterpreted what I thought was a fairly obvious post and secondly you seemed to go to so much effort between your first and second contribution to find some dirt on me so you could slander off and make yourself look good. And i thought that kind of thing only went on in primary schools:8
Anyway, i'm just as bad for responding so before this thread deviates too far off topic or turns into another cadet bashing thread i'll contribute to the orginal question.
Thrills- Yes some cadets are still waiting to be placed but will be so very soon, who knows where. There are currently no cadets in sunstate or brindabella that i am aware of.

BackdoorBandit 14th Jan 2007 19:29


Whats not normal about that. 200hr pilots in the UK are in the right seat of 737 and bigger!
Whats not normal is that flying a Dash in and out of non radar, uncontrolled ports, is a hell of lot different to being spoon fed whilst flying into controlled ports with radar coverage.

Sure, cadets can do it, BUT it is not AS safe, AND we don't have to do it.

There must be 50 Metro's flying around Oz today, and at least half the crew in them would be more than suitable for an Airline seat, not to mention the crews in similar machines plying our skys today. AND here we are argueing that Cadets are suitable - what a friggin laugh.

mattgitau 14th Jan 2007 23:13

mmmm' Backdoorbandit' - it must be so difficult to fly a relatively sophisticated turbo-prop into an non radar, uncontrolled AD.....just imagine if another aircraft was in the circuit!! wow....that would mean you would have to fly the plane, look out the window, monitor TCAS, make radio calls try and get some sort of Situational Awareness going on.....wow.......just imagine how much easier it would be if there were two of you sitting up the front.

I guess it must be so easy for those spoon fed jet drivers over here....i mean how hard can it be to fly a jet, try and maintain some kind stabilised approach whilst slowing down or speeding up - (depending on traffic), trying to maintain S.A, monitor TCAS, talk on the radio, make last minute changes to CDU's, Fly approaches to the absoute minima in crap weather, on absolute min fuel......mmmmmm i can see how much easier it is in the spoon-fed world.....boy........i am suprised that dont do the whole boeing/Airbus thing single pilot IFR.....actually why not VFR - turn the x-ponder off and use a different call sign to avoid Airways charges.

You have it all figured out!......i really dont know how those Metro's do it.....maybe it would be safer if they all just stayed on the ground.


AND here we are argueing that Cadets are suitable - what a friggin laugh.it
.......mmmmmmmm......lets see.......i was a cadet........and a GA Driver.....and a Metro driver.........and now a wide-body driver.......all in the space of 5 years..........mmmmmmmmmm was i never suitable......mmmmmmm

''what a friggen laugh''
. my 'friend' the joke is on YOU

brown_hornet 14th Jan 2007 23:54

dr_doLiTTle
that has got to be the best post this thread has seen thus far. Not to echo your thoughts, but everyone is really tired of the same old argument everytime that cadets aren't 'qualified' enough or don't deserve to sit in the RHS of a dash or similar aircraft. I am a cadet and have plenty of mates in GA and true, sometimes i have wondered why the cadetship is neccessary as there are heaps of 210/206 drivers etc that are eager to move on up. The fact is though that it is here to stay for the foreseeable future and I think rather than bitch and moan about it, a bridge needs to be built. At the end of the day, there's going to be people up the front of airliners from a military background, GA background and cadet background amongst others so get over it. I'm sure guys from each of those backgrounds would have equally valuable war stories to tell not to mention ability.
As for some people's misguided thoughts that in the RHS of a dash or whatever is not a safe place to be, and I quote, "learning how to fly", exactly when has someone reached the pinnacle and learnt how to fly? Is it the 20th, 50th, 100th hour of flying a 210 around the bush? Aviation is one of those industries where you are still learning throughout your ENTIRE career so don't use that argument. Cadets join these said operators after a pretty intense traning period which focuses heavily on multicrew procedures so are more than prepared for what's ahead. I have no doubt that the average GA pilot's manipulative ability might be more polished but on the flipside I also know of GA pilots who have struggled to make the move to multi-crew procedures after spending a fair bit of time in single pilot operations. There are pros and cons to both sides.
Enough said (hopefully, or should i put on my bullett proof vest?).

podbreak 15th Jan 2007 00:22


Originally Posted by dutch_oven (Post 3065818)
I heard there's even cadets on the a320 with jetstar asia....yet no hull losses recorded! :eek: I know WynSock, I know... it surprises me too :}

This is a typical and highly ignorant point of view. If you are even remotely worried about the experience level, and skill, of these folks because they don't have the same time as F/Os in Australia, you have your worries misplaced. Comment on their quality when you've got one sitting next to you on the flight deck.

ABX 15th Jan 2007 02:31

Could someone please disable mattgitau's ....... full stop key?:}

bushy 15th Jan 2007 03:56

Cadets??
 
They should ALL be cadets. And the airlines should pay the bills.

B A Lert 15th Jan 2007 04:21


Originally Posted by bushy (Post 3068740)
They should ALL be cadets. And the airlines should pay the bills.

Reallllllllly? Why, and why? Why should airlines be (a) charities, (b) educational/trainiung establishments, and (c) other than in the business of carrying people and freight?


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:07.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.