Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Should Virgin Be Tighter........

Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Should Virgin Be Tighter........

Old 28th Jan 2003, 22:46
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Next door
Posts: 249
Cool SHOULD VIRGIN(S) BE TIGHTER?............

Just been reviewing the recruitment process for a number of Airlines worldwide. Apart from some contract employers, the standard industry screening process is quite extensive, particulary post Sept 11. e.g.

Stage 1: Critical review of detailed application
Stage 2: Intial interview
Stage 3: Indepth Psych/ skills testing
Stage 4: 2 days of ASTRONAUT level medical exam.
Stage 5: Stringent Sim Check. (i.e. overbank=FAIL)
Stage 6: Final interview with a plethora of tech questions.
Stage 7: Critical review of all of the above along with criminal history checks, accident history, etc, etc...

For the lucky few....
At some time much later an offer for at best an F/O position with command years away. (15yrs in QF for NG command.)
During which time they are scrutinised to death.

VBs nominal process is a stark contrast.

I really do not believe the Staff Cv is considered at all. (Anti-discrimination smoke screen only!!)
With the required nominations from friends within or in high places and the correct status re: '89; a 30 min "don't fall off the chair" chat and you know your fate that arvo.

Almost all are accepted.

With upgrade to NG Capt. in WORLD RECORD minimum experience/ time (Impluse 1900 f/os, no jet exp to NG Capt. in six months) and with no time for scrutiny i.e. smoking gun to reveal itself or CRM skills to be honed.

A titanic difference in the selection process for the same job.

Especially when one would expect that VB should require much more investigation into the candidate given, the extraordinarily quick promotion once employed.

E.G. Foreign pilots with experience that is impossible to confirm and beliefs that may not conform with ours.

Last edited by E.P.; 28th Jan 2003 at 23:38.
E.P. is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2003, 22:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: sydney
Posts: 63
Well

They are doing a bloody good job in the cabin crew department. Keep up the good work. Tight skirts no problem
thumpa is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2003, 00:28
  #3 (permalink)  

Grandpa Aerotart
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SWP
Posts: 4,620
EP

Stage 1: VB do this.
Stage 2: Proves nothing except whether the candidate is good at BS.
Stage 3: Has been proved not to be of any value and is therefore not used much outside of aviation, certainly not by modern, enlightened companies.
Stage 4: Outside of a very few carriers (JAL etc) this is not done. And we're not astronauts.
Stage 5: And what enlightened system would decide a candidate is suitable or not based on 30 minutes in a (probably) unfamiliar aircraft (sim) under very stressful conditions? Everyone I know who has been successful in a interview sim ride has bought sim time so they don't stuff it up. It is rediculous to expect someone who's used to, for instance, an F28/DHC8/B737 to hop into an A320 sim and fly it well cold...and proves nothing other than the stupidity of those requiring you do. VB have plenty of opportunities to release you if you don't perform in the sim, and it costs them very little.
Stage 6: Proves you've read Handling the Big Jets.
Stage 7: Critical revue of what?

I have been (successfully) through both the 4 day marathon which you espouse and the 30 minute quicky based on recommendation (not VB) that you seem to believe is so flawed. Neither system is perfect however the later is far less flawed than the former. QF is living proof of that!

I have an uncle just in the process of retiring from a senior management position (non aviation) who has vast experience in HR. When we discuss general airline recruiting he shakes his head in amazement. Except when it comes to discussing the style of recruitment used by VB, and others I might add. In his opinion this style of recruiting staff is very powerful and is the method used universally in modern, enlightened non aviation companies.

Chuck.

Last edited by Chimbu chuckles; 29th Jan 2003 at 00:41.
Chimbu chuckles is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2003, 00:40
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Next door
Posts: 249
Cool

Thanks Chimbu.

There is no mention by me that either system, especially VBs system is flawed. There is only a comparison and an observation.

QF along with Virgin Atlantic and almost all Airlines conduct extensive medicals, usually to JAR or FAA standard at least.

I am only interested in why there is such a difference.

Since you are enlightened, can you advise of any other Airline in the world that does a 30 min interview and offers employment?
E.P. is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2003, 00:40
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Budaiya HWY
Posts: 35
Whatever airline selects me has the best selection process.
Bagshaw Crusher is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2003, 00:41
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: america
Posts: 20
Why in the world do people keeping crying about the DJ guys and gals. For God sakes get a life and leave them alone. I read a post recently degrading the new hires as "guys who could never get into a real airline due to failure in the interview etc".

Who cares. Good luck to them. All of us love to fly jets and these guys are lucky to get a shot. Not to mention all of the aussies over seas returning home.

In defense of the critical, I do believe they should have seniority and higher pay, however, as they say times are a changing.

Cheers
ilovelonghaul is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2003, 01:57
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: nz
Posts: 86
Does the long drawn out interview described make you a better pilot than the shorter version that vb are said to use.
Surley after six months it is going to be fairly obvious whether you are capable of the job or not.You will be spending time with a training Captain/Senior pilot during this time and they must have the qualifications to determine your abilities , and I am sure that any airline around the world is not going to have anyone flying multi-million dollar aircraft that is not up to standard.Just sounds like another excuse to bag vb.
cnsnz is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2003, 03:07
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,383
EP - Progression to Captain does seem to be quick. If people are passing then they must have the goods.

For FO's? I say well done guys. Its good to hear the GA guys and girls getting a go.

Perhaps a 19yr old with 200 hrs that can fold boxes and answer 400 questions might be a better candidate? I think not .

Wouldn't the kiddies get a fright if all airlines wanted the 500 multi command. But I suppose daddy could always buy those anyway.... .
Mr. Hat is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2003, 04:12
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Matrix
Posts: 10
Thumbs up

Well said Mr hat! Goodluck to these new pioneers in Australian Aviation. Its good to see! In the pacific ,guys/gals go right hand seat on 737ngs after just 1000hours total time.And fly them internationally. If given an oppurtunity anybody can do it...
kava_crew is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2003, 08:29
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Hot zone
Posts: 195
EP, it does happen. In my last job the assesment consisted of an extensive medical and a 20 minute sim check-no interview. That was for a very large Asian carrier. Prior to that- again an extensive medical and a one hour sim check. Again for a large Asian carrier. My current job; no sim, no medical, no interview. They had my c.v. for one day and we negotiated a price the next.

Having said that I am obviously not good enough for VB.
I have been applying for two years and do know how to fly the 737 from the left seat. Go figure. Obviously being neither a s..b nor a 'lock-outee' and not knowing anyone who will bat for me is the answer.
Maisk Rotum is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2003, 08:48
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Living next door to Alan
Posts: 1,522
Talking Eh, Chimbu

Chimbu,

we use the sim ride as a tool for assessing a candidate in an unfamiliar aircraft type with the view to how well they respond to flying said aircraft and how quickly their skills improve over the duration of the simex. (learning curve)

This can be very useful in deciding (firstly) whether they have the skills they claim, and (secondly) whether they are likely to have sufficient capacity to get through the training (the cost of which is met by the Company) first time.

Having said that, if you are a Company that doesn't have to worry about the cost of simulator/endorsement training (which can be in excess of $25k per endorsement), then the sim ride becomes less of a priority, doesn't it? Line training costs no more than the Training Captain's loading, say 7% of his base, as it is done on revenue services.

A minor 'error' such as overbanking (as one poster put it) is not cause for an overall fail. It most likely would not even draw comment on the assessment form.

However, recurrent and consistent errors do draw attention, such as altitude busts where the candidate does nothing about it. Or where he/she sits 'just' in tolerance on an instrument approach and appears to do nothing about getting 'on' track.

Sure, you can go and buy some time in the sim. In fact I'd recommend it. That shows determination to getting the job. It's just making yourself more marketable, isn't it?

Last edited by Hugh Jarse; 29th Jan 2003 at 09:05.
Hugh Jarse is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2003, 09:34
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 27
Goodluck to these new pioneers in Australian Aviation

Give me a break!!
Geddy is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2003, 10:33
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Next door
Posts: 249
Cool

Come by chance I think you may sell used cars on your days off.

VB at best has two stages.

Stage 1: Those who are nominated and have correct '89 status get a shot. I fail to see why VB keep the nomination requirement a secret. Please do not embellish the screening process to something that it is clearly not.

Stage 2: The 30 min."gidday". Anyone? Anyone at all ever been asked a tech question, anyone?? CbC maybe you could enlighten us with how your interview was conducted?

Thats it folks. If your in and most are, you know by that arvo.

If you do not have a 737 endorse it's off to MEL to hand over $25k to the two VB Capts who run the course.

Fail the "employment sim check" after this? I will leave that alone.

The point is why is it so "different" to even VBs "Sister" Airline Virgin Atlantic?

Last edited by E.P.; 29th Jan 2003 at 11:07.
E.P. is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2003, 10:57
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: East Coast
Posts: 52
Wink

E.P.

Have I got a deal for you, 1 1990 Ford Falcon, I lady owner since new and only 50000 km's on the clock

I know of 2 pilots who were hammered with high speed flight questions and 20.1.7B questions, 1 got a yes, the other got a no.

Also know of 3 Regional Airline Captains who have failed the interview.

Didn't Ansett have a similar process for their interviews up until the late 90's (then they changed), ie called down for a chat, a sim ride and a medical and that was it????

What I find strange is the way all 3 (now 2) Qantas regionals conducted their interviews. All 3 companies were different, yet all 3 operated Dash 8's.

Anyone know what the recuitment process is for Virgin Express?

I'm still waiting for my interview, I guess I don't know enough people high up in the food chain. Just know lots who have done or are soon to have an interview.

Do you think that over time their interview process will change and become more indepth?

Last edited by ComeByChance; 29th Jan 2003 at 11:28.
ComeByChance is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2003, 05:22
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The Ponderosa
Age: 47
Posts: 792
E.P,

Unfortunately it could take a while for me to get past stage 1.

To start with,I know many Pilots in VB but probably not quite well enough for a nomination. Then as you refer to it '89 status',last look on 'the list' revealed 3 other Pilots share the same surname,2 of which have the same first initial . I was still at school when 'the war' occured.

Oh well, hoss
hoss is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2003, 23:04
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Next door
Posts: 249
Angel

It reminds me of a young lady who was asked during the VB interview of her thoughts on '89.

She replied that she was in Year 4 and only 8yrs old at the time!!!

Upon reflection I can see that each company may require a different "Style" of pilot therefore, a different process is used.

However, there have been several people selected for VB and subsequently leave for QF and other carriers of such ilk, both prior to and after starting.

Does VB select pilots who they feel will stay with the company? Is this why all other Airlines put so much into their selection? Very, very few ever leave QF and not one has left to join VB to take advantage of wiping 15 yrs off their wait for a command.

I am genuinely curious as to the mind set of J.R. et el. The forthcoming expansion means that all current pilots will be Captains by years end. With that (despite the very high standard and experience levels of my friends and others in VB) VB will have the dubious honour of having the youngest fleet and the lowest AVERAGE JET experienced crews in the world.

Last edited by E.P.; 30th Jan 2003 at 23:27.
E.P. is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2003, 06:03
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tonga
Posts: 13
RE: Virgin being Tight

Despite the provocative Thread title, your comments don't add anything to the discussion. W

Last edited by Woomera; 31st Jan 2003 at 06:13.
somyungi is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2003, 08:02
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Asia
Posts: 5
EP you are misinformed. I know of at least 1 (very experienced, 12,000hrs +) who left QF to join VB

Last edited by FL450; 31st Jan 2003 at 08:14.
FL450 is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2003, 04:21
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oz
Posts: 152
Lets face it, seems that at the end of the day the d-head/ good guy ratio appears to be the same as QF, possibly better, jumping through all those hoops amounts to jack ****.

EP, with you on the smoking gun thing and Virgin, I think, are realising that already. ( ie. it's happened )

Mr.Hat, the unfortunate/ fortunate ?? thing about our profession, is that anyone can have a really good day/days and pass a check.
It does'nt necessarily mean they should be where they are. To back this statement up, the company I was with had more than one Captain pass his initial ceck only to fail later down the track.
I'm with stupid is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2003, 10:32
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: gamma quadrant
Posts: 268
E.P,

I find your comments interesting about experience levels in VB.
I am sure CASA are monitoring just that......
All airlines require a min experience level which is normally for insurance purposes.
If VB continue to expand at the current rate a close eye must be kept on experience levels, because if something unfortunate should happen the press will jump on it.......
The best solution is highly experienced contract pilots. However they don't come cheap.....................
propaganda is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.