Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Squarking or Non-Squarking

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Nov 2002, 11:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: aus
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Squarking or Non-Squarking

Many things can destroy the pleasure of a passengers travelling experience, but for pure travelling agony, nothing is worse than the screaming infant close by. The effects of the screaming infant are multiplied exponentially with every sleepless hour that is passed on a longhaul flight.

Why don't airlines offer PAX another level of product whereby they can purchase a seat that offers them a seat that is guaranteed to be free from interference from infant aggravation? As a regular travelling passenger, I would pay extra for this service without a second thought.

Come on airlines, take this one up, it will improve the travelling lives of so many people you wount believe, and there's extra money in it for you.

I know that there can only be certain amounts of infants per zone, but if it makes the airlines extra yield for an infant free zone, it makes even more sense.

Go Airlines, read this post, and do it!!!!!
pullock is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2002, 11:24
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,188
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
Hope you don't mind me saying so but I think the correct spelling is "Squawking". It's in AIP!
Centaurus is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2002, 12:04
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: aus
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Centauraus,

The noise that a transponder and a bird makes is way less offensive then the SQUARKING that I am talking about!!
pullock is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2002, 20:55
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Biz class is usually free of infants you could try that area.

Or maybe as well as setting up a seperate area for pax with infants they could have one for those that snore and maybe one for the larger people that spill over onto your seat? But then how do you manage the armrest sharing, maybe we could paint a line down the middle?
Cruncher is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2002, 10:22
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bassionet (sp?) possitions are usually marked on seating charts, steer clear of those. It seems kids are kept out of exit rows (maybe because of the frequent flyer who always ask for them ) so if you sit near them your odds of being kids/infant free are increased.

if you want a kick free back go for a back row in a section, provided you don't mind missing on on some recline in the seats. Only, don't do it near toilets...

hope that helps
Aussiebert is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2002, 11:19
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,188
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
Pullock. I go along with that observation 100%.
Centaurus is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2002, 13:33
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Darraweit Guim, Victoria
Age: 64
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Once had a be-suited gent sit next to us on a flight to Vancouver, spot the 8-month old and start whining pitieously to crew about a seat change. He'd specifically asked for the row with the legroom, despite the row of cots on the bulkhead in front, so he could relax...

I took great delight in poking the 8-month old if he ever looked like getting to sleep.
Spodman is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2002, 18:25
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: aus
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't it ironic therefore, that not only do annoying babies inconvenience all the other travellers in their vicinity, but their parents get to travel in the best seats by default, and at no extra cost!!!

The other travellers thus pay and pay and pay..............

Still if I was offered a higher priced ticket to ensure tranquility in my travel, I would fork out the dough in a second.
pullock is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2002, 23:50
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Classified
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those Squarking kids will be paying taxes and supporting us all with public services when we are old.

Be a little bit tolerant - 99% of the time the parents are doing their best to keep things down to a dull roar esp. with babies.

I must admit I am less tolerant of rampant undisciplined 4 y.o. kids than of 6 month old babies who have no idea of what is going on.
D.Lamination is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2002, 21:14
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Well it's an IRS nowdays, but the AHRS were fun.
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On Swiss trains they have a quiet section. No cell phones, No children, No talking... I couldn't travel there cos my kids are too noisey.
#1AHRS is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.