Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Qantas Project Sunrise Airbus order 2 May 2022?

Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas Project Sunrise Airbus order 2 May 2022?

Old 2nd May 2022, 09:32
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SandyPalms View Post
Ollie. They are 2 different orders for A321xlr's.

I've also heard that they are different engine types. JQ CFM and QF P&W
There is an earlier order for A321LRs and now an order for XLRs.

  • Demonstration of this flexibility with confirmation today that Jetstar will convert 20 of its existing A320 family order to A321XLRs, which have the potential to fly short haul international routes, with delivery to start in the second half of calendar 2024. (The first tranche from this existing order 18 A321LRs are due to arrive from July 2022 onwards.)
https://www.qantasnewsroom.com.au/me...pe-its-future/
Going Nowhere is offline  
Old 2nd May 2022, 10:09
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SandyPalms View Post
Ollie. They are 2 different orders for A321xlr's.

I've also heard that they are different engine types. JQ CFM and QF P&W

Gotcha, thanks
Ollie Onion is offline  
Old 2nd May 2022, 11:00
  #43 (permalink)  
JRK
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wasn't the original 744 flight canned because even the premium class pax found it to be too exhausting?

JRK is offline  
Old 2nd May 2022, 11:46
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: OZ
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Andrasz,
Fuel burn goes almost exponential for ultra long haul ops.
As I recall it, the extra burn per ton for B744 SYD-DFW was about 650Kg/ton uplifted. That refers to fuel or payload coz fuel is really just house bricks until you burn it. Hence it is way more fuel efficient to make a stop at the half way point. Think about covering a tempo T/Z at DFW ex SYD, about 8 tons.
One day the greenies will wake up to this and go nuts about ultra long haul.
mustafagander is offline  
Old 2nd May 2022, 12:49
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mustafagander View Post
As I recall it, the extra burn per ton for B744 SYD-DFW was about 650Kg/ton uplifted.
The A350 is a lot more fuel efficient than that ol' gas guzzler. On an 11 hour LHR-HKG sector, the correction is around 230 kg/tonne.
BuzzBox is offline  
Old 2nd May 2022, 13:47
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 1,870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Buckshot View Post
12 A350 frames would be about 100ish Captains. Any speculation how senior these slots would likely go? ie don't hold out if your number isn't < 300
Itll be some years before the first slots are even out. The A380 is still a higher category aircraft, so the A350 positions would go junior to 300. And with the 787 still there, and a number of 330s as well (their numbers will start declining soon but with movement to other fleets Id imagine therell still be a need to train onto the aircraft for a while) in a few years we really could start to see some quite junior LH commands.

A321 commands could be enticing for senior WB FOs (or those not wanting to endure the dodgy seat back on the 73) or even those 65+ bidding back with an easier conversion compared to 73.
The numbers of over 65s who return to SH has always been small. The fact the 321 would be doing quite a bit of BoC with less opportunities for inflight rest and the usual busy domestic flying would not be that enticing for a long time long hauler. Coming back to multi sector days, aircraft swaps, quick turnarounds, battling weather, MELs, delays non stop is usually not the desire right before retirement.
dr dre is offline  
Old 2nd May 2022, 15:22
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Asia
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With all the excitement nobody has mentioned anything about B scale for new joiners
AQIS Boigu is offline  
Old 3rd May 2022, 00:31
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Al's Diner
Age: 62
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Buckshot View Post
12 A350 frames would be about 100ish Captains. Any speculation how senior these slots would likely go? ie don't hold out if your number isn't < 300

A321 commands could be enticing for senior WB FOs (or those not wanting to endure the dodgy seat back on the 73) or even those 65+ bidding back with an easier conversion compared to 73.
The first 90 slots on the A330/A350 SFF are reserved to existing A330 crew (stated in the EA). The company also said there is no cross bidding B787 to A330/A350 and vice versa. If vacancies were out today for a Sydney only base, you could see Captains with seniority up to the 500s
Potsie Weber is offline  
Old 3rd May 2022, 03:38
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CCA View Post
QF royalty is likely boarding the plane in Perth so they can have a jolly.

Having QF staff depart from France was likely a bit risky Covid wise.
Well I dont think itd be much of a jolly, when the back is only full of test equipment and a few economy seats with no wall lining.

Good to finally see Qantas order some new aircraft though, hope it translates into some movement for you all.
morno is offline  
Old 3rd May 2022, 04:37
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interestingly I was told recently that the A380 positions may not necessarily go to the most senior. (I'm not privy to lists anymore so can only go on what I'm told.)
Most senior 330 pilots want the 350 slots, 737 pilots want a 330 or 787 (depending upon lifestyle domestic vs international & Boeing familiarity), 787 mob happy to stay there, leaving some of the more senior mid-range 330 pilots (say number 40-80 on type) the opportunity to jag a 380 with a relatively comfortable conversion and more time at home than they get now...
C441 is offline  
Old 3rd May 2022, 07:32
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Lower North Shore
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dr dre View Post


The numbers of over 65s who return to SH has always been small. The fact the 321 would be doing quite a bit of BoC with less opportunities for inflight rest and the usual busy domestic flying would not be that enticing for a long time long hauler. Coming back to multi sector days, aircraft swaps, quick turnarounds, battling weather, MELs, delays non stop is usually not the desire right before retirement.
Will Over 65s be able to return to SH if the 321 is doing longer haul flying?
Brakerider is online now  
Old 4th May 2022, 02:13
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

Originally Posted by TimmyTee View Post
Isn't it slightly ironic that an empty 1000 is flying to perth and not direct to Sydney (presuming it will head straight there after perth)?
They would have been timing the SYD arrival for the scenic/promotional arrival and photography over Sydney Harbour. Morning sun on the Opera House Sails... Also probably the fuel calculation made sense.
For goodness sake is offline  
Old 5th May 2022, 11:19
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK/OZ
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I read a pollie claiming sunrise flights can only operate from Kingsford Smith, because the runway at the new Western airport is too short.
True?
Mjb
mickjoebill is offline  
Old 5th May 2022, 12:22
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: 3rd Rock
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mickjoebill View Post
I read a pollie claiming sunrise flights can only operate from Kingsford Smith, because the runway at the new Western airport is too short.
True?
Mjb
At 3700 metres long its hard to imagine runway length being an issue
Lapon is offline  
Old 5th May 2022, 18:56
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Runway 34L at SYD is 3962m. The A350-1000 still has the same MTOW even if most of it is kerosene. So if QF1 LHR direct can only use that runway and not one 262m shorter at Western SYD Qantas better do a rethink on safety margins. Hahaha...
For goodness sake is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2022 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.