Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

New Hobart International Runway

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

New Hobart International Runway

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Mar 2022, 07:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
New Hobart International Runway

In downtown Hobart for a few days and we have been bombarded on commercial radio, with advertising about the need for a new international runway at Hobart.

Do they plan to extend out into the bay to the south, or cross the highway or planning a new runway?

Might be planning direct flights to Ukraine?

CharlieLimaX-Ray is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2022, 07:55
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Asia
Posts: 615
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by CharlieLimaX-Ray

Might be planning direct flights to Ukraine?
How about more repat flights?
AQIS Boigu is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2022, 09:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
What’s with all these councils and local governments giving us modelling about pipe dream passenger direct flights to Asia, Europe and America. Lunacy.

While your wasting our taxpayer dollars, do me just one thing and build bloody taxiways to each end. Should be a minimum for a capital city airport. Numerous third world airports I’ve flown about in Asia are better laid out.
PoppaJo is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2022, 09:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,878
Likes: 0
Received 245 Likes on 106 Posts
What is an international runway?
Does it have a second passport or some sort of outrageous French accent?

2727 meters x 45 metres seems pretty good for the South Island.
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2022, 10:12
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,373
Received 203 Likes on 92 Posts
do me just one thing and build bloody taxiways to each end.
The dopey Maroochy council only made them to halfway down, so there is a long wait at the holding point in the 737 while Grandpa makes a slow approach in his Cessna and has to add power to get past the holding point to allow the 737 to enter and backtrack. Total waste of time and taxpayer money by not taking it to the full length.
Ascend Charlie is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2022, 10:59
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,294
Received 139 Likes on 63 Posts
They only extended it a few years ago… so they could do more international flights!

https://development.hobartairport.co...nway-extension
compressor stall is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2022, 12:51
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,071
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
The runway is long enough. How about building an aerobridge or two? Passengers are left to walk in the open across the pavement in cold weather and rain half the year because the airport is to cheap to actually build a real terminal. Why the OH&S folks haven't started a campaign on this yet is beyond me.

Last edited by neville_nobody; 19th Mar 2022 at 14:25.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2022, 15:38
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Earth
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by neville_nobody
The runway is long enough. How about building an aerobridge or two? Passengers are left to walk in the open across the pavement in cold weather and rain half the year because the airport is to cheap to actually build a real terminal. Why the OH&S folks haven't started a campaign on this yet is beyond me.
OH&S for passenger's doesn't exist. a string of flags and underpaid lady in heels is all that stops a person from running towards a live aircraft. don't get me started on allowing young kids and infants to board via rear entry without hearing protection.
unobtanium is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2022, 19:57
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: OZ
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 2 Posts
Phase 1 has been completed lengthening the runway to 2727m and this is Phase 2 strengthening the old section and taxiways to accommodate Code E aircraft as well as a parking apron for Antarctic gateway flights
Buckshot is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2022, 22:10
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,253
Received 195 Likes on 90 Posts
Its not just Hobart that treat passengers as sheep going into the shearing shed. OOL,MCY, PPP and the truly awful T4 at Melbourne. Pax complain but they will still buy the ticket so the airlines and the airports don't care.
Lookleft is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2022, 22:42
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,878
Likes: 0
Received 245 Likes on 106 Posts
An interesting story about air bridges (Aerobridge, Jetway etc) from a “developing country”. When the new KLIA 2 terminal was being built in Sepang, the CAAM was forcing AirAsia to use air bridges due to safety concerns. At the old LCC terminal AirAsia always boarded with roll up stairs, it was quicker and cheaper said Tony Fernandez, a man used to getting his own way. The argument went on for quite a while but the CAAM won and when operations started at KLIA2 all carriers had to use the aero bridges. Fernandez complained about slowing down the quick turn around needed for a LCC and also the cost.
Meanwhile here we are in Oz thinking it is okay to use roll up stairs and operate one hundred seat jets on regular FIFO services to airports with zero fire and rescue. Let’s see how that plays out when there is an accident. But I digress.

https://themalaysianreserve.com/2017...e-aerobridges/

https://www.klia2.info/news/2011/air...sabled-groups/

Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2022, 00:28
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
Originally Posted by Lookleft
Its not just Hobart that treat passengers as sheep going into the shearing shed. OOL,MCY, PPP and the truly awful T4 at Melbourne. Pax complain but they will still buy the ticket so the airlines and the airports don't care.
The airlines only care when people start challenging these at risk procedures which results in inflated costs. I remember Jetstar having a sook when Dick was pushing for more tower hours and so on at Avalon. Jetstar then claimed its operation was unviable down there. Great to see Safety is first. Trading safety for saving dollars only goes so far. As we see with Byron, the clock is ticking.
PoppaJo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.