MH370 - "new" news
The crew oxygen bottle was serviced by Malaysia immediately prior to departure.
Where do you think the aircraft is located, and how did it get there?
Thanks MickG0105, if one assumes that the crew oxygen bottle ruptured in flight, then one must accept all the failures associated with damage to the adjacent P105 Left Wire Integration Panel / Left AIMS Cabinet. The amount of failures would be HUGE! Now play that scenario. It ends in the southern Indian Ocean at the seventh arc near 34S 93E at fuel exhaustion.
The crew oxygen bottle was serviced by Malaysia immediately prior to departure.
The crew oxygen bottle was serviced by Malaysia immediately prior to departure.
An oxygen bottle bursting is entirely speculative. The damage arising from such an event is similarly speculative. As to "playing that scenario", it's a design your own adventure based on what gets damaged and how badly but it's a Goldilocks scenario - there can't be too much damage or it brings the story to a premature conclusion; too little and the aircraft is recoverable.
That whirring noise you can hear in the background is the "1 in a ..." probability meter spinning its way through the hundreds of millions.
You then add to all of that speculation at least an equally speculative series of events built around crew hypoxia. I don't know if you've ever been hypoxic but the notion that a crew survived in a persistent hypoxic state for an extended period of time while carrying out tasks of varying levels of complexity while missing others of lesser complexity stretches the bounds of both physiology and probability.
You've had experienced flight crews, some with hypobaric experience, critique all of that. My advice would be to look at incorporating that feedback into your theory through modification rather than looking to argue the toss about flight crew reactions/procedures with blokes who have actually flown the 777 for a living.
If you have followed any of the main forums addressing the disappearance you'd be familiar with an oxygen bottle burst theory that doesn't rely on hypoxic happenstance but it is no less speculative in the grand scheme of things.
It's in the SIO, almost certainly within 35 nm of the seventh arc, likely somewhere between 30°S - 35°S. 34°S routinely pops up in a variety of flight path analyses as a hot spot so I wouldn't be surprised if it is found around there.
And I'm pretty sure that it flew there.
The following 2 users liked this post by MickG0105:
MickG0105:
Brilliant!
That whirring noise you can hear in the background is the "1 in a ..." probability meter spinning its way through the hundreds of millions.
It's in the SIO, almost certainly within 35 nm of the seventh arc, likely somewhere between 30°S - 35°S. 34°S routinely pops up in a variety of flight path analyses as a hot spot so I wouldn't be surprised if it is found around there.
And I'm pretty sure that it flew there.
And I'm pretty sure that it flew there.
And what flightpath did it take to get there? I’m very curious.
You will have to forgive me, but I may not have made my point clear so I will repeat it. The facts speak for themselves. The government the pilot opposed was his employer. They held something over him. In court, his friend’s overturned conviction was reinstated and he was going to prison. It is no stretch of imagination to believe the pilot may have been facing a similar fate and if there is any doubt about this, what happened next removes it.
Within hours of leaving that courtroom, he committed suicide. Imprisonment for sodomy would have ended his career, completely destroyed his reputation and voided his pension. He was highly motivated to kill himself and no one would question any of these facts so far if that was all he did.
Within hours of leaving that courtroom, he committed suicide. Imprisonment for sodomy would have ended his career, completely destroyed his reputation and voided his pension. He was highly motivated to kill himself and no one would question any of these facts so far if that was all he did.
Who leaving what courtroom??!! There is not one scintilla of evidence that Zahaire Shah was present at the Ibrahim hearing on 7 March 2014 whereas there is some evidence - his mobile phone records - which indicate that he was likely nowhere near the courts when the Ibrahim hearing was in session.
Then you'll have no difficulties either posting them or a link to them. The problem that you will run into is that there are none - apart from any other factor, the Federal Courts of Malaysia do not permit cameras in their courtrooms
As I stated earlier, there is no evidence that Zaharie attended the Ibrahim hearing on 7 March 2014. Whether he was "influenced" by the outcome on the day is an entirely different matter.
As I stated earlier, there is no evidence that Zaharie attended the Ibrahim hearing on 7 March 2014. Whether he was "influenced" by the outcome on the day is an entirely different matter.
Originally Posted by [b
ferry pilot;11355608]Originally Posted by ferry pilot
The facts speak for themselves. They held something over him. In court,
The facts speak for themselves. They held something over him. In court,
Originally Posted by [b
ferry pilot;11355608]Originally Posted by ferry pilot
It is no stretch of imagination to believe the pilot may have been facing a similar fate and if there is any doubt about this, what happened next removes it.
It is no stretch of imagination to believe the pilot may have been facing a similar fate and if there is any doubt about this, what happened next removes it.
Originally Posted by [b
ferry pilot;11355608]Originally Posted by ferry pilot
what happened next removes it.
what happened next removes it.
Originally Posted by [b
ferry pilot;11355608]Originally Posted by ferry pilot
Within hours of leaving that courtroom, he committed suicide.
Within hours of leaving that courtroom, he committed suicide.
Originally Posted by [b
ferry pilot;11355608]Originally Posted by ferry pilot
He was highly motivated to kill himself
He was highly motivated to kill himself
An oxygen bottle bursting is entirely speculative. The damage arising from such an event is similarly speculative. As to "playing that scenario", it's a design your own adventure based on what gets damaged and how badly but it's a Goldilocks scenario - there can't be too much damage or it brings the story to a premature conclusion; too little and the aircraft is recoverable.
You then add to all of that speculation at least an equally speculative series of events built around crew hypoxia. I don't know if you've ever been hypoxic but the notion that a crew survived in a persistent hypoxic state for an extended period of time while carrying out tasks of varying levels of complexity while missing others of lesser complexity stretches the bounds of both physiology and probability.
You've had experienced flight crews, some with hypobaric experience, critique all of that. My advice would be to look at incorporating that feedback into your theory through modification rather than looking to argue the toss about flight crew reactions/procedures with blokes who have actually flown the 777 for a living.
If you have followed any of the main forums addressing the disappearance you'd be familiar with an oxygen bottle burst theory that doesn't rely on hypoxic happenstance but it is no less speculative in the grand scheme of things.
It's in the SIO, almost certainly within 35 nm of the seventh arc, likely somewhere between 30°S - 35°S. 34°S routinely pops up in a variety of flight path analyses as a hot spot so I wouldn't be surprised if it is found around there.
And I'm pretty sure that it flew there.
You then add to all of that speculation at least an equally speculative series of events built around crew hypoxia. I don't know if you've ever been hypoxic but the notion that a crew survived in a persistent hypoxic state for an extended period of time while carrying out tasks of varying levels of complexity while missing others of lesser complexity stretches the bounds of both physiology and probability.
You've had experienced flight crews, some with hypobaric experience, critique all of that. My advice would be to look at incorporating that feedback into your theory through modification rather than looking to argue the toss about flight crew reactions/procedures with blokes who have actually flown the 777 for a living.
If you have followed any of the main forums addressing the disappearance you'd be familiar with an oxygen bottle burst theory that doesn't rely on hypoxic happenstance but it is no less speculative in the grand scheme of things.
It's in the SIO, almost certainly within 35 nm of the seventh arc, likely somewhere between 30°S - 35°S. 34°S routinely pops up in a variety of flight path analyses as a hot spot so I wouldn't be surprised if it is found around there.
And I'm pretty sure that it flew there.
The following users liked this post:
When the wreckage is found hopefully then we'll be able to determine the flightpath. Trying to determine a flightpath from the vanishingly small dataset derived from the Inmarsat satellite connections is fraught with problems. There was always some conjecture as to the aircraft's actual flight path only an hour or so after the turnback at IGARI; even that level of uncertainty so early in the flight makes the whole route determination task highly problematic.
You might want to acquaint yourself with the use of probabilistic qualifiers such as "likely". I did not say that it is "at 34S", rather I offered a range of latitudes that I thought the wreckage was likely to be found in. That range is based on the oceanography associated with the recovered wreckage.
The following 5 users liked this post by megan:
The following 3 users liked this post by MickG0105:
I think it should be L = CL x (0.5 x p x Vsqd) x S.
How did he (and you) know his cousin never did that? Everyone does it, don't they? Well maybe not everyone. But the point is no one was out to imprison everyone in Malaysia who enjoyed engaging in that particular act. His cousin was being shunted out for political reasons not because anyone cared where he put it. The law says the charges were proved therefore he did it but no one was out to get Capt Shah. Let's be real here.
.
.
well, there is a reasonable assumption that it wasn't a coincidence, or you suggest there was another extraordinary thing that happened which made him do all of this
I meant it's a sin to accuse others of killing 200 innocent men without even knowing what was his intention.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: victoria bc
Age: 82
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What I have posted here is simply a collection of facts. They point to a conclusion based on logic that some, like me will see as not only possible but probable. However, as long as the airplane remains undiscovered there is no proof of anything. No facts are indisputable no matter how they add up. This was an international disaster, with potential for far more than legal and financial consequences. So far, those who choose to speculate on other possibilities far outnumber those who don’t.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: victoria bc
Age: 82
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He had an active online presence and a far more liberal attitude toward alternate lifestyles than his fellow pilots and government employer. He may or may not have been gay, but left himself open to the same charges his friend faced, perhaps because of the company he kept. Fabricated maybe, but he was playing politics in an unforgiving world. Spend some time digging into who he really was. Activist hardly begins to describe him.