Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas...Post COVID

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Apr 2021, 03:36
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 189
Received 113 Likes on 31 Posts
Question is how long can QF international survive? If this looks like it’s going to go on for a few years then AJ and shareholders won’t want the rest of the group to spend a cent propping up international. The government may seriously have to look at some kind of arrangement to prop it up if it is to survive
The other option is to let it fail and that would be no good for any Australian.
davidclarke is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2021, 03:38
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 80
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts
Substitute QF with any longhaul airline code to get a better answer
Chris2303 is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2021, 03:53
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: East of Westralia
Posts: 682
Received 109 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by turbantime
Put the international division into voluntary administration. Clean the slates and start again. Negative publicity will be more than offset by the savings to be had by renegotiating everything from financing to EBAs.
If only it was so easy. Our industrial laws don’t allow for what you propose. Besides which, Qantas (Mainline) is one company - no such thing as voluntary administration on a departmental basis.
ScepticalOptomist is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2021, 03:55
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: East of Westralia
Posts: 682
Received 109 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Transition Layer
After Greg Hunt’s comments the other day that even after the vaccine rollout the borders may stay shut makes you wonder how QF Intl can survive in its current form.
Again, Greg Hunt was asked if he could absolutely GUARANTEE that the border would stay open - and like everytime
the media ask for a GUARANTEE the answer has to be NO.

His answer of course made headlines with all the usual BS...
ScepticalOptomist is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2021, 04:10
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not at work
Posts: 1,571
Received 76 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by ScepticalOptomist
Again, Greg Hunt was asked if he could absolutely GUARANTEE that the border would stay open - and like everytime
the media ask for a GUARANTEE the answer has to be NO.

His answer of course made headlines with all the usual BS...
Good point...perhaps I got sucked in by the headline along with everyone else! I do feel the rhetoric has changed though - because they have stuffed the vaccine rollout they are becoming more gun shy about opening up.
Transition Layer is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2021, 06:49
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Al's Diner
Age: 64
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by davidclarke
Question is how long can QF international survive? If this looks like it’s going to go on for a few years then AJ and shareholders won’t want the rest of the group to spend a cent propping up international. The government may seriously have to look at some kind of arrangement to prop it up if it is to survive
The other option is to let it fail and that would be no good for any Australian.
QF International was pretty small pre-COVID. The 787’s are all now flying and a bunch of A330’s. They lost quite a few to VR, ER and LWOP. Be interesting to know the numbers they still have, probably not too far from a stable part-time workforce apart from the A380.

As long as things don’t go backwards but continue a slow pace forward, there would be no reason to get rid of International. The 787 and A330 flying is only going to increase and they have the option to use them domestically as well.

Another round of VR would have a good take up I would think.
Potsie Weber is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2021, 11:05
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sincity
Posts: 1,195
Received 33 Likes on 17 Posts
No VR on the horizon for now
maggot is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2021, 13:26
  #108 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Borders opening is ‘when’, not ‘if’ and it’ll be well before the end of next year.

I reckon when they hit the 60% mark they’ll set a date 6 months in the future beyond that and tell the other 40% of the population they have that long to be vaccinated because after that the borders are open.

I also reckon we may have a phased start up. Singapore and Japan could be by years end or potentially earlier- especially in Singapore’s case. My guess is the borders to the USA will be opening around March/ April next year. The UK if they end up with everyone vaccinated and nil transmission could end up open by this Christmas with some minor restrictions for them to isolate upon arrival for a few days until negative test is confirmed. Manila perhaps not for a couple of years.

Depends a bit on how successful the vaccine is in stopping transmission. If it significantly decreases it AND it stops severe Covid AND most of the populations is vaccinated, why would there be any restrictions at all?

As to QF crew numbers, I reckon QF have worked out how to do the minimum and how to hibernate everything. The scenario that is probably giving them nightmares at the moment is if demand roars back. With long lead times required for the A380 to get aeroplanes and crew up to speed it’d take 12 months plus to get all 12 jets back in the air. I reckon they could do 3-4 in four months. 6 Jets in about 9 months. The remaining six would probably take another 6 months on top of that.
Keg is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2021, 21:31
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Removed pending phone call....

Last edited by goodonyamate; 18th Apr 2021 at 22:53.
goodonyamate is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2021, 22:03
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Union is completely lame. We didn’t use the power of collective bargaining when we had it. We allowed the company to bypass the Union entirely in the last EBA vote.

The company ignored the Union when we had something to bargain with. Why on earth would the company listen to them when we have absolutely nothing to bargain with? They aren’t even pursuing EBA variations anymore.
Tucknroll is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2021, 22:25
  #111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 396
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by goodonyamate
Does anyone know what the ‘new’ AIPA execs position is on 380 crew? QF will not deviate from their
position, that being the trigger for 380 crew to be paid is when the 380 is back, ie Nov 2023. Understandably, there are 380 crew pretty annoyed about this, and as one caller put it on the last webinar, this is a ‘seniority based award’. I might have mis interpreted his position, but the assertion that we are all ‘LH pilots’ seemed to me like a question of ‘why can’t we the senior crew take the seats of those the junior crew’. Where does AIPA stand on this? For all the talk by the G20 of a lack of transparency from the previous exec, I can’t say I’m at all impressed with the new regime. TBH on on the edge of leaving AIPA. Anecdotally I’m told there is still some work going on to see if it is legally possible to bump junior crew. I hope this is incorrect, but for all their talk, I find their transparency completely non existent! Anyone?
Don’t need AIPA to sort this one out.

Come the time when slots are advertised, and they will, A380 crew have every right to bid for them. In most cases their seniority will win them the slot. The company cannot knock them back.....it’s the award, sorry EA.

How can the company argue no useful work in that case?
Wingspar is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2021, 22:26
  #112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 247
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Has AIPA ever been transparent? Every group that leads a charge for a take-over promising bluer skies under delivers just as much as the last.
engine out is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2021, 22:42
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
............

Last edited by goodonyamate; 18th Apr 2021 at 22:53.
goodonyamate is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2021, 22:50
  #114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 642
Received 19 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by goodonyamate
I almost feel guilty for feeling this way about AIPA as I know there are some fantastic people who really do work hard for others to their own detriment. However I can’t help feel like it is back to being a LH pilots union.
re bidding for slots, I agree. However it is unlikely the trigger for SH training will be met anytime soon. I’m told hours nextbrister vary between bases from mid 50’s. There is also no requirement for the company to allow LH crew to bid back for anything that isn’t a promotion. I can’t see them allowing a back bid if they truly believe the 380 will be needed, due to cascading training etc.

this is just a sh$t sandwich.
Agreed. Now that I’m emptying my leave bank, I’m looking closely at leaving AIPA until I’m back at work. Nothing political, but if I’m out of work for the next two years I need all the money I can get.
ruprecht is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2021, 23:59
  #115 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Associate membership available for those not drawing an income from QF. $20/ month. I appreciate that for some even this is a bridge too far at the moment.
Keg is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2021, 23:02
  #116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 42
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
https://australianaviation.com.au/20...m-its-academy/
mmm345 is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2021, 01:26
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Equatorial
Age: 51
Posts: 1,068
Received 125 Likes on 62 Posts
Well that was the plan all along.
Global Aviator is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2021, 01:50
  #118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,298
Received 356 Likes on 195 Posts
Originally Posted by Global Aviator
Well that was the plan all along.
Absolutely. No surprise that an airline chooses to employ recruits from it’s own academy.

Fantastic news after the year we’ve had that recruitment is starting again. Hopefully more of it to come.
dr dre is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2021, 02:01
  #119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Getting there eventually
Posts: 38
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Global Aviator
Well that was the plan all along.
Applications for 36 month secondments from inside the group are open too, I think they close today actually.
Callsign Please is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2021, 12:36
  #120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 16 Posts
So I guess the academy needs more students? Nobody will sign up if they don't think there is Qantas group job at the end.

I'm also guessing they will hire based on what looks good for PR purposes?
Climb150 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.