Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Qantas domestic fleet: A320neo vs B737MAX

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas domestic fleet: A320neo vs B737MAX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Mar 2021, 00:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: MEL
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas domestic fleet: A320neo vs B737MAX

Apparently the 'domestic contest' which was suspended due to Covid is back on for the end of this year, AJ says now is the best time to be talking turkey with Airbus and Boeing and hammer out the best deal.

Airbus A320neo, Boeing 737 MAX battle for billion-dollar Qantas order: https://www.executivetraveller.com/n...r-qantas-order
MelbourneFlyer is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 00:54
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
110 A32N won’t be going to Jetstar way too heavy. Asian affiliates are leasing their own machines also which was not part of the original plan, creating further excess. With the inability to scale specifically this long-standing French order back it’s pretty clear some will replace the NGs.

The 321 would let QF go up against Virgin’s new toy the MAX10.

However I would expect a small order of MAXs at prices just too good to refuse. Perhaps 30-40

PoppaJo is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 02:48
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,071
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
From a product and customer comfort standpoint the 320 is a clear winner. However Boeing will probably give the Max away at half price so everyone can keep shoehorning themselves into a 737 for another 25 years. End of the day the actual product is irrelevant in airlines, it's all about the bottom line regardless.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 03:14
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Lower North Shore
Posts: 277
Received 23 Likes on 11 Posts
If the rumours are true about how cheap MAXs are selling, then QF would be silly not to.
Brakerider is online now  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 03:16
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,298
Received 356 Likes on 195 Posts
Originally Posted by PoppaJo
However I would expect a small order of MAXs at prices just too good to refuse. Perhaps 30-40
It would make sense to get about that number of MAXs, you could dual crew the NG and the MAX considering about half the 737s are only about 10 years old, will have 10-15 years of service left and even the oldest A/C still have some life left in them til the middle of the decade.

Nothing stopping them also getting a few A321LRs, maybe convert some of the 330 crew over and fly more point to point to secondary ports in Asia like Seoul, Osaka, Shenzen?
dr dre is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 03:41
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 642
Received 19 Likes on 5 Posts
So is Qantas going to pay their stood down crew before or after they order new jets..?
ruprecht is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 06:00
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: BBN
Posts: 984
Received 94 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by ruprecht
So is Qantas going to pay their stood down crew before or after they order new jets..?
Ive heard all 737 crews are stood up, so I would guess yes.
SHVC is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 07:25
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,432
Received 207 Likes on 69 Posts
If it is the 737 max I won't be paxing on it, wonder how it will go if I refuse. The thing is just straight up dangerous.
Ollie Onion is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 07:39
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,298
Received 356 Likes on 195 Posts
Originally Posted by Ollie Onion
If it is the 737 max I won't be paxing on it, wonder how it will go if I refuse. The thing is just straight up dangerous.
Did you hold the same standards after the 737 Rudder PCU issues in the 90s? After the necessary fixes were completed?
dr dre is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 08:02
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ollie Onion
If it is the 737 max I won't be paxing on it, wonder how it will go if I refuse. The thing is just straight up dangerous.
That’s pretty funny. Good luck with that.
PPRuNeUser0184 is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 08:08
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Melbourne
Age: 68
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ollie Onion
If it is the 737 max I won't be paxing on it, wonder how it will go if I refuse. The thing is just straight up dangerous.
And suddenly , without any prompting , a poster outs themselves as knowing nothing.
George Glass is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 08:30
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: East of Westralia
Posts: 682
Received 109 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Ollie Onion
If it is the 737 max I won't be paxing on it, wonder how it will go if I refuse. The thing is just straight up dangerous.
Oh wow, and you’re a pilot?
ScepticalOptomist is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 08:43
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,432
Received 207 Likes on 69 Posts
Yep, a very experienced pilot swell :-) As long as MCAS remains installed on the Max with software patches then the aircraft is always going to be at risk. I prefer the solution suggested by one of the outgoing FAA certification engineers who simply said the 'only' safe solution for the max was the total removal of the MCAS system as it was only ever installed to meet FAA certificaton with all required manoeuvres being able to be achieved without the system albeit with some slackness in the controls. Boeing also hasn't addressed the Autothrust issue which could have been addressed by simply incorporating an auto disconnect function. I hope that the recertification goes smoothly but I for one don't want to fly on one for a few years to see how it pans out and that is my choice I guess.
Ollie Onion is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 08:50
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: M.I.A.
Posts: 209
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Zero training costs vs the A350 steak knives.
Pretty tough to call this one.
Bug Smasher Smasher is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 08:56
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: HKG
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bug Smasher Smasher
Zero training costs vs the A350 steak knives.
Pretty tough to call this one.
Damn I was hoping to make some $$ selling the Bose A20
Green.Dot is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 11:42
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Ollie Onion
If it is the 737 max I won't be paxing on it, wonder how it will go if I refuse. The thing is just straight up dangerous.
Says a Jetstar pilot with a few years of HAL9000 time tucked under his belt.

Right.

I’d fly a max in a heartbeat over a 10+ year old Airbus that’s been flogged out in a LCC.
Blueskymine is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 12:11
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,468
Received 310 Likes on 116 Posts
Originally Posted by Blueskymine
Says a Jetstar pilot with a few years of HAL9000 time tucked under his belt.

Right.

I’d fly a max in a heartbeat over a 10+ year old Airbus that’s been flogged out in a LCC.
What difference does it being in a LCC make?

Give me an Airbus over the 1960's designed 737.
morno is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 12:41
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not at work
Posts: 1,571
Received 76 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Ollie Onion
If it is the 737 max I won't be paxing on it, wonder how it will go if I refuse. The thing is just straight up dangerous.
Simple...pax on your own airline! Oh that’s right, it doesn’t have Business Class.
Transition Layer is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 13:04
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 569
Received 313 Likes on 109 Posts
Qantas to operate a handful of cheap Max’s’ and Network to operate the 100+ Neos.
aussieflyboy is online now  
Old 16th Mar 2021, 20:57
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Equatorial
Age: 51
Posts: 1,068
Received 125 Likes on 62 Posts
This is hilarious watching the I won’t get on this or fly on that!

The MAX will surely be one of the safest aircraft and crew more than trained by the time it ends up with you strapped into it. As a passenger it is a lovely aircraft to fly on, J class seemed a lot more spread out compared to the 800, or that could be airline specific. Even Y class seemed better. That was the Silk MAX now SQ.

The MAX can fly 6+ hours and Silk used it for SIN CNS direct.

The A321NEO long range or whatever it’s called, has an impressive range and what is it 240 pax? I suppose if it has more lavs/ galleys less seats.

Either way its chalk and cheese, way too much fuel in the tanks for my liking on a narrow body (ie it goes too far)!
Global Aviator is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.