QF Group possible Redundancy Numbers/Packages
1500 Ground staff
Sounds like almost all the international terminal ground staff have got the axe. Takes a huge chunk out of TWU representation (and remove another thorn from Joyce's garden). Just wonder if the Transport Guys at Mascot will be spared - or will that go to Carbridge as well.
What they say - and would like - is different from what they CAN do.
If there are no government restrictions imposed, the stand downs cease. Then they are dealing with a business issue - if there aren’t enough customers. If they decide they are overstocked with staff, then they need to follow the relevant EAs with respect to redundancies etc.
Irrespective of what is implied, you can’t be kept stood down forever - I wish people would realise this. It’s not up to the company to decide when it applies - otherwise no one would ever be made redundant - they’d just be stood down indefinitely.. that’s not how IR law works.
If there are no government restrictions imposed, the stand downs cease. Then they are dealing with a business issue - if there aren’t enough customers. If they decide they are overstocked with staff, then they need to follow the relevant EAs with respect to redundancies etc.
Irrespective of what is implied, you can’t be kept stood down forever - I wish people would realise this. It’s not up to the company to decide when it applies - otherwise no one would ever be made redundant - they’d just be stood down indefinitely.. that’s not how IR law works.
It becomes a commercial issue of demand!
I foresee an argument from the A380 crew when the time comes if QF still insist on standing them down.
Yes, they can say ‘no useful work’ all they want but if the international borders come down then there is no legitimate reason to stand someone down.
It becomes a commercial issue of demand!
I foresee an argument from the A380 crew when the time comes if QF still insist on standing them down.
It becomes a commercial issue of demand!
I foresee an argument from the A380 crew when the time comes if QF still insist on standing them down.
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Unfortunately not the Orient
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 88 Likes
on
32 Posts
Yep, without question.
Stand-Down Provisions
Notwithstanding any other clause of this Agreement, the Company is entitled to deduct payments from the pay of a pilot for any day on which the pilot cannot be usefully employed because of any strike, stoppage or any other limitation of work for which the Company cannot be held responsible subject to the following conditions:
Once we are past the government restrictions, it can’t be considered that the Company cannot be held responsible
Stand-Down Provisions
Notwithstanding any other clause of this Agreement, the Company is entitled to deduct payments from the pay of a pilot for any day on which the pilot cannot be usefully employed because of any strike, stoppage or any other limitation of work for which the Company cannot be held responsible subject to the following conditions:
Once we are past the government restrictions, it can’t be considered that the Company cannot be held responsible
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sydney
Age: 41
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep, without question.
Stand-Down Provisions
Notwithstanding any other clause of this Agreement, the Company is entitled to deduct payments from the pay of a pilot for any day on which the pilot cannot be usefully employed because of any strike, stoppage or any other limitation of work for which the Company cannot be held responsible subject to the following conditions:
Once we are past the government restrictions, it can’t be considered that the Company cannot be held responsible
Stand-Down Provisions
Notwithstanding any other clause of this Agreement, the Company is entitled to deduct payments from the pay of a pilot for any day on which the pilot cannot be usefully employed because of any strike, stoppage or any other limitation of work for which the Company cannot be held responsible subject to the following conditions:
Once we are past the government restrictions, it can’t be considered that the Company cannot be held responsible
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Unfortunately not the Orient
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 88 Likes
on
32 Posts
Norm, Norm, Norm. Again with the hatred of those senior. That is the legal clause. Are you suggesting we should amend it? I don’t want anybody made redundant. If amendments are to be made, the company must negotiate.
I would add that company will ask for concessions. Many of those will, most likely, adversely effect those at the top half to benefit only those at the very bottom. Your attitude won’t be helping them when their finger is poised over the yes or no button. Something to think about.
I would add that company will ask for concessions. Many of those will, most likely, adversely effect those at the top half to benefit only those at the very bottom. Your attitude won’t be helping them when their finger is poised over the yes or no button. Something to think about.
The clause in the EA partially quoted above sets out the triggers for the stand down. There is nothing written in the EA or the general stand down info available at Fair Work that outlines a process or trigger for stand up. It will be the FWC that will have to rule on this. What is the political make up of the FWC these days, who appointed them? Where will they sit in terms of the needs of the economy and the health of Qantas versus the interests of the A380 guys. Will the government be supportive of the A380 pilots position or join the proceedings to offer a counter view. Good luck in predicting how this will turn out.
I doubt there would be too much of an issue claiming that the ‘no useful work’ was due covid, even when the borders open and therefore beyond the company’s control. The movement of people is likely to be heavily restricted for years to come.
what a sh$t day.
what a sh$t day.
Jetstar Newcastle pilots + crew , Maintenance and Perth pilots closing. Best wishes to all.
I doubt very much the majority of my colleagues will see fit to hamstring themselves to prevent my inevitable reunion with the scrap heap.... and to be honest I wouldn't expect them to either.
Qantas has always been the land of the have's and the have more's. On the one hand there are people hanging on for dear life and on the other are people squabbling about superannuation implications.... quite surreal really.
I went through this with Ansett and am preparing to go through it again now. If you are in the firing line, I'm thinking of you.
Qantas has always been the land of the have's and the have more's. On the one hand there are people hanging on for dear life and on the other are people squabbling about superannuation implications.... quite surreal really.
I went through this with Ansett and am preparing to go through it again now. If you are in the firing line, I'm thinking of you.
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sydney
Age: 41
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Norm, Norm, Norm. Again with the hatred of those senior. That is the legal clause. Are you suggesting we should amend it? I don’t want anybody made redundant. If amendments are to be made, the company must negotiate.
I would add that company will ask for concessions. Many of those will, most likely, adversely effect those at the top half to benefit only those at the very bottom. Your attitude won’t be helping them when their finger is poised over the yes or no button. Something to think about.
I would add that company will ask for concessions. Many of those will, most likely, adversely effect those at the top half to benefit only those at the very bottom. Your attitude won’t be helping them when their finger is poised over the yes or no button. Something to think about.
You have your definition and reasoning, the company has a different view. It's the same with redundancy LH vs SH. If it goes that far it will end up in the courts. Stuff like this has never been tested. Your not right, your not wrong, it is just an opinion.
If you are employed on the 380 and the company says there is no useful work for them for 3 years (borders closed or not) then you can remain stood down (yep it sucks).
I do not believe that allows you to use your seniority to jump ship elsewhere, simply because another fleet is maybe flying 10%. That's ridiculous.
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Sydney
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A lot of the senior QF pilots should really treat this as a golden opportunity to wind down, to travel a bit (when able) etc. VR would be great but many of us do this job because we love flying and it is bloody hard to give up, not because of the money but job satisfaction. This period will give those who don't want to retire just yet, time to really explore what retirement will be like, and hopefully in a year or so, get back to flying.
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Denmark
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
QF guys Looking at JQ eba, why?
GE email today wanting to reduce 550 AUSNZ no indication of pilots or cabin crew, NTL and PH crew will be given options For a base most likely limited choices given the environment. 787 crew stood just like QF international. All in all JQ pilots NB and WB will be stood up as needed no word of any being made redundant.
GE email today wanting to reduce 550 AUSNZ no indication of pilots or cabin crew, NTL and PH crew will be given options For a base most likely limited choices given the environment. 787 crew stood just like QF international. All in all JQ pilots NB and WB will be stood up as needed no word of any being made redundant.