Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

QF Group possible Redundancy Numbers/Packages

Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

QF Group possible Redundancy Numbers/Packages

Old 13th Jun 2020, 04:20
  #161 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If we have to give up leave accrual while stood down to prevent CR. Its a no brainer.

Blueskymine is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2020, 04:46
  #162 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 616
Received 151 Likes on 47 Posts
Originally Posted by Blueskymine
If we have to give up leave accrual while stood down to prevent CR. Its a no brainer.
Is it?
2000+ pilots go to zero income to prevent (who knows) 2-300 pilots from going to zero income. It’s something we will all need to consider the merits of but I don’t think it is a ‘no brainer’.

Are the most junior pilots served well by being stood down with no leave for an indefinite period vs being made redundant and paid out accordingly?
I’d have though that a guarantee of re-employment, in seniority order, at the earliest possible moment in reply to a temporary reduction in MGH (as an example) would provide a greater total benefit to the pilot body.
Beer Baron is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2020, 07:38
  #163 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,285
Received 348 Likes on 189 Posts
Originally Posted by Beer Baron
Is it?
2000+ pilots go to zero income to prevent (who knows) 2-300 pilots from going to zero income. It’s something we will all need to consider the merits of but I don’t think it is a ‘no brainer’.

Are the most junior pilots served well by being stood down with no leave for an indefinite period vs being made redundant and paid out accordingly?
I’d have though that a guarantee of re-employment, in seniority order, at the earliest possible moment in reply to a temporary reduction in MGH (as an example) would provide a greater total benefit to the pilot body.
The big advantage to keeping everyone one stood down, is that you are still an employee. You are still in the system, so when some flying slowly comes back it can be shared around for all at lower divisors and all can have a regular income (albeit less than before). Being an employee means the company has legal obligations to you, and should look out for your welfare as well.

Being made redundant means you are on your own. There is the redundancy list, but it means running the HR gauntlet again and having them approve more recruitment, which won't happen for a while I guess. HR may be happy to keep a lower number of pilots on higher hours than re-employ those made redundant? Not to mention the psychological effect of being made redundant. Anyone made redundant isn't going to be finding employment as a pilot very easily.

A lot of those at the bottom are in their first stable airline job, and at an age where they have taken out a home loan, just gotten married, had their first child etc. They are at a vulnerable stage of life and throwing them out on the street with a few weeks redundancy payout into an environment where airline employment is near on impossible is something I cannot do in good conscience.
dr dre is online now  
Old 13th Jun 2020, 07:45
  #164 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 616
Received 151 Likes on 47 Posts
A lot of great points. Well put.
Beer Baron is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2020, 08:33
  #165 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not at work
Posts: 1,571
Received 75 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Beer Baron
Is it?
2000+ pilots go to zero income to prevent (who knows) 2-300 pilots from going to zero income. It’s something we will all need to consider the merits of but I don’t think it is a ‘no brainer’.

Are the most junior pilots served well by being stood down with no leave for an indefinite period vs being made redundant and paid out accordingly?
I’d have though that a guarantee of re-employment, in seniority order, at the earliest possible moment in reply to a temporary reduction in MGH (as an example) would provide a greater total benefit to the pilot body.
Didn’t blueskymine refer to leave accrual while stood down? Not sure how that equates to zero income. JobKeeper might continue post Sept for certain industries/companies (like Qantas) but the company might say “collect your govt money, burn some leave (if you have some) to supplement it, but your leave balance won’t grow while stood down on Jobkeeper”. I think that’s what they were referring to.
Transition Layer is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2020, 09:23
  #166 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well said Dr Dre, for exactly that.

A no brainer.
Blueskymine is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2020, 09:36
  #167 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: East of Westralia
Posts: 681
Received 107 Likes on 31 Posts
Sorry to disagree here. If the viability of the company is dependant on whether or not they are accruing leave entitlements for those stood down, we are all doomed.

I am all for reduced MGH once we are all stood up to avoid redundancies - as per Dr Dre’s reasoning, but the company can’t have half its workforce stood down indefinitely because it suits them at zero cost to them.

There has to be some give and take - the company get massive flexibility when it’s time to be ramping up by having everyone still on the books, the least they can do is dribble in your entitlements, and the least we can do is be flexible around MGH once we are all stood back up.
ScepticalOptomist is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2020, 10:58
  #168 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Equatorial
Age: 51
Posts: 1,067
Received 124 Likes on 61 Posts
Originally Posted by Potsie Weber
i think we will be surprised by just how many will want to come to Australia when they can, even with strict 14 day quarantine. Backpackers, retirees etc who can spend months travelling around a huge country and NZ, freely with no risk of COVID.

If quarantine controlled international arrivals are allowed here by northern hemisphere winter, Australia will be a very popular place for those with money to stay here for 3-4mths.

I have been talking with some expat UK friends that live here and they are really hoping to bring parents and family here to escape the northern winter and potential second/third wave. They said everyone they talk to are thinking the same thing, even getting family out here permanently as soon as possible.

Australia is in for a post COVID boom the likes of post WWII.
It is great to see people with a positive outlook. It can’t get much worse than what it is, one would hope! I to am a believer that things will get better sooner than expected. Of course for airlines that means they have to be ready when a ramp up comes.

Making huge redundancies, LWOP, etc, will there be enough trainers and sims?

Will it be a case of QF Int parked up whilst the likes of QR, EK, SQ, etc who are possibly in a more ready position take the work?
Global Aviator is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2020, 11:50
  #169 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 448
Received 37 Likes on 13 Posts
I guarantee that almost, if not every pilot on the bottom of the list would very much prefer no leave accrual whilst stood down (lwop pretty much) over redundancy. Keeping the connection is key.

Fonz121 is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2020, 12:03
  #170 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: HKG
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fonz121
I guarantee that almost, if not every pilot on the bottom of the list would very much prefer no leave accrual whilst stood down (lwop pretty much) over redundancy. Keeping the connection is key.
Concur, I would say a huge difference in most people’s mental health between taking LWOP over redundancy, don’t underestimate the importance of that right now.
Green.Dot is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2020, 20:59
  #171 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,622
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
The 6 380s that are not refurbished are been sent to the Mojave next month to reduce parking fees. I don’t know if they are coming back.
dragon man is online now  
Old 13th Jun 2020, 22:06
  #172 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Maningrida
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
True that redundancy has a terrible effect on someone’s mental health.

It’s happened to me twice before, once in 90s and another time as a knock-on from Ansett.

Both times it was just myself (no dependents or mortgage etc). Both times still terrible; as were the empty promises from the regional operator to rehire us when the time came.

Sadly, in our volatile industry, it can be cyclical feast or famine. If you haven’t already, It’s likely that most will be touched by some form of this in a pilot career.

For the newer pilots, perhaps those who just landed an airline job and thought they’d made it (took out the mortgage, bought the car, had the kids etc), I do feel for you. Sometimes you’re just in the wrong place at the wrong time. Could just as easily have been me.

Lessons learned the hard way. The only thing for sure is that persistence and determination will ensure you’re back flying when the time comes.
dontgive2FACs is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2020, 00:19
  #173 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: east
Posts: 224
Received 8 Likes on 2 Posts
Honestly I think QF Long Haul will need everybody by sometime next year . you would think that with a strong balance sheet QF will exploit the market where other Airlines cannot , they surely must be looking at new routes as country's open up .
Qf has probably a once in a lifetime chance to establish new markets and encourage Australians to fly with them, the FF scheme certainly helps with loyalty. The other unknown is Virgin , if they dont come back who will carry the 20 million pax per year they once had .
There is a real possibility in the future that QF group will need to expand in size rather than contract. play the waiting game and all will be revealed .
Scooter Rassmussin is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2020, 00:43
  #174 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 396
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also I would expect a lot of point to point travel.
That way would minimise risks that hubs would otherwise present.
Perhaps something for the 787 crew to be positive about.
Wingspar is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2020, 04:46
  #175 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 342
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
For those advocating that being redundant and then re-employed will be a simple process, just need to go ask the third of the bloke cadets who got scrapped for pretty dodgy reasons (if any). While they weren't on the seniority list, they did have to go through the whole HR gauntlet all over again. Effectively you could be in a similar position they found themselves in years after passing all the hurdles.
If you're a male near the bottom of the list, I'd be cautious of any "offer" like this..
TimmyTee is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2020, 05:20
  #176 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by TimmyTee
If you're a male near the bottom of the list, I'd be cautious of any "offer" like this..
I must have missed the part of the EBA that says they'll only fire males in reverse seniority
Give it the herbs is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2020, 06:01
  #177 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Give it the herbs
I must have missed the part of the EBA that says they'll only fire males in reverse seniority
but if they lay off the bottom 200 pilots, when it comes time to re-hire, HR have diversity quotas to fill...
ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2020, 06:42
  #178 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,622
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
Originally Posted by ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE
but if they lay off the bottom 200 pilots, when it comes time to re-hire, HR have diversity quotas to fill...

F##k HR and the horse they rode in on.
dragon man is online now  
Old 14th Jun 2020, 06:48
  #179 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,244
Received 189 Likes on 85 Posts
So just to be sure that I have this correct. At present there has not been a single pilot within the Qantas Group who has been issued with any redundancy notice. This might change in a very dynamic situation but for now all pilots are still employed as pilots albeit most not actually flying. I think all this angst over RIN/ redunancy/ down training is just causing a lot of people a lot of unnecessary anxiety. Just be grateful that you are employed by an airline that stands a very good chance of coming out of this situation in a much stronger position than its contemporaries. Certainly in a much better position than any domestic competitor. If you are so concerned about where you stand in terms of having a job in QF then can I suggest you start focusing your energy on obtaining a different qualification otherwise just take things one roster period at a time to paraphrase the footy coaches.
Lookleft is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2020, 07:18
  #180 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,366
Received 355 Likes on 206 Posts
"Hiring and training pilots can be so limiting to expansion as it has a considerable lag time."

true but you're assuming the rebound will be very fast - in fact , like after 911, it'll be 2-3 years. there will be a load of pilots out there , many in Australia, and they don't need training from scratch when you need them. I suspect it'll be a slow, but steady expansion - but from a very low base.
Asturias56 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.