Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Virgin 2.0 to swap A330s and B777s for Boing 787s

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Virgin 2.0 to swap A330s and B777s for Boing 787s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th May 2020, 02:09
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 80
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by BNEA320
NZ is talking about YVR to start soon, so you'll be able to fly Australia/AKL/YVR in couple of months & maybe SFO & LAX month after that.
There has been nothing in the NZ news about Air NZ restarting any international at all for the foreseeable future and, in fact, Saint Jacinda has made it clear that the border is closed until the end of the year (with the possible exception of Tasman).

Air NZ made no mention of starting anything except Tasman in their Webinar yesterday. Even Pacific is on hold due to the lack of medical facilities in those countries.

You Aussies need to stop dreaming and start listening. Your revered Prime Minister has said "no international until after Christmas".

Last edited by Chris2303; 15th May 2020 at 03:34.
Chris2303 is online now  
Old 15th May 2020, 02:15
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sydney
Age: 41
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just ignore BNEA320. They talk a lot of **** with no substance.
normanton is offline  
Old 15th May 2020, 02:26
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 941
Received 26 Likes on 10 Posts
Big paint brush saying 320 represents what Australians think. My opinion is we won’t see any international outside the Tasman for 18 months minimum other than VERY limited services mostly for medical supplies with a few pax chucked in. Tasman is months away too, the states aren’t even close to opening their borders.
I have great fears for the states, that really is years away and therefore Canada by default.
ozbiggles is offline  
Old 15th May 2020, 02:43
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Lost in Space
Posts: 275
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ozbiggles
Big paint brush saying 320 represents what Australians think. My opinion is we won’t see any international outside the Tasman for 18 months minimum other than VERY limited services mostly for medical supplies with a few pax chucked in. Tasman is months away too, the states aren’t even close to opening their borders.
I have great fears for the states, that really is years away and therefore Canada by default.
The USA will be fine. They do not need much. Trade with Mexico will keep them going for a while. The domestic market is huge and resilient.
t_cas is offline  
Old 15th May 2020, 02:57
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris2303
There has been nothing in the NZ news about Air NZ restarting any international at all for the foreseeable future and, in fact, Saint Jacinda has made it clear that the border is closed until the end of the year (with the possible exception of Tasman).

Air NZ made no mention of starting anything except Tasman in their Webinar yesterday. Even Pacific is on hold due to the lack of medical facilities in those countries.

You Aussies need to stop dreaming and start listening. Your revered Prime Minister has said "no international until after Christmas.
think about it for a second. Both PMs want tourism dollars to stay in each country not go overseas, cos both countries are worse than broke.

You'd think anyone & everyone posting on here would be talking it up. Look at real estate ... it's stuffed as an investment, but every real estate agent in the country is saying it's not & so is media, cos billions are spent on real estate advertising in Australia every year.

The more people holiday at home, the more jobs will be re-created. It's really that simple. Who ever takes what a pollie says as gospel.

Surprise, "tomorrow"(whenever that is) it will be something like, you've all be so good in Qld with only 6 deaths, we'll reopen the borders.
BNEA320 is offline  
Old 15th May 2020, 03:09
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BNEA320
yes it will probably be a month before TT flights resume on a regular basis. NZ is talking about YVR to start soon, so you'll be able to fly Australia/AKL/YVR in couple of months & maybe SFO & LAX month after that. It should be noted that flights within USA have not been restricted at all, just less flights, but some are rather full. Announcements about having to wear masks, but these are not being enforced.

So my bets for regular passenger flights (without any quarantine) are:-

OZ domestic - 1 JUNE or maybe intrastate only ?
TT-1 JULY
CANADA-1 AUGUST
USA-1SEPT

What dates are you all betting on ?
Definitely not 2020 for International to US. I'm in WA so it'll be much longer for International from here but I think it's sensible that way. The regional passenger flights that will start in Phase 4 for all of the state could help our tourism industry after maybe a few years. Of course it will take a long time but it will happen. Interstate travel should start from Phase 4 which would be later this year (maybe September for WA, July/August for over East?) and then possibly the Trans-Tasman bubble will include flights to/from Perth when the Eastern states would have already had NZ flights operating for a little while longer. I know that Air New Zealand postponed their AKL-JFK by 1 year from October 2020 to October 2021, makes a lot of sense to me. It also depends on when other countries open their borders, I think if anyone in Australia wants to do any sort of planning for a holiday in the near-ish future I would say it would be best to choose somewhere within Australia or maybe New Zealand depending on the trans-Tasman bubble.
UsernameGoesHere is offline  
Old 15th May 2020, 03:31
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 80
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/a...ectid=12332155

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says any transtasman travel agreement will not happen quickly and is more than "weeks" away.

Ardern said she could not put a timeframe on when travel to Australia might resume - but warned "it won't be weeks" - it would be longer.

She said she did not want travel to and from Australia to endanger the very low rates of the virus in New Zealand.

However, Flight Centre founder and CEO Graham Turner, said on Friday morning international travel between Australia and New Zealand could be July.

I think I've identified BNEA320 - he is Graham Turner from Flight Centre
Chris2303 is online now  
Old 15th May 2020, 03:45
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: aus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 107 Likes on 68 Posts
You have to define what a restart is, because australia <-> Us flights never stopped. American and united have been running daily flights. Singapore have been running daily as well. Qatar have been running twice daily to some aus capital to doha. International flights never stopped they just massively decreased

It will be when changes to quarrantine happens, they will respond to demand and inrease flights if needed
rattman is online now  
Old 15th May 2020, 05:48
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris2303
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/a...ectid=12332155

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says any transtasman travel agreement will not happen quickly and is more than "weeks" away.

Ardern said she could not put a timeframe on when travel to Australia might resume - but warned "it won't be weeks" - it would be longer.

She said she did not want travel to and from Australia to endanger the very low rates of the virus in New Zealand.

However, Flight Centre founder and CEO Graham Turner, said on Friday morning international travel between Australia and New Zealand could be July.

I think I've identified BNEA320 - he is Graham Turner from Flight Centre
So if extremely dodgy NZ PM means more than few weeks away, it'll be 6 weeks or less. Why do people keep quoting those with vested interests ?
BNEA320 is offline  
Old 15th May 2020, 05:49
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rattman
You have to define what a restart is, because australia <-> Us flights never stopped. American and united have been running daily flights. Singapore have been running daily as well. Qatar have been running twice daily to some aus capital to doha. International flights never stopped they just massively decreased

It will be when changes to quarrantine happens, they will respond to demand and inrease flights if needed
restart without any quarantine whatsoever
BNEA320 is offline  
Old 15th May 2020, 05:56
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Qld
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by rattman
You have to define what a restart is, because australia <-> Us flights never stopped. American and united have been running daily flights. Singapore have been running daily as well. Qatar have been running twice daily to some aus capital to doha. International flights never stopped they just massively decreased

It will be when changes to quarrantine happens, they will respond to demand and inrease flights if needed
American doesn't fly to Australia atm.

Aside from the QF/VA operating the government subsidised once-weekly LAX repatriation charters, it's only UA doing the regular scheduled Australia-USA non-stops atm (The sole route being SYD-SFO which is mostly empty pax-wise, carrying mostly freight).
DanV2 is offline  
Old 15th May 2020, 13:23
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
US Domertic

Originally Posted by t_cas
The USA will be fine. They do not need much. Trade with Mexico will keep them going for a while. The domestic market is huge and resilient.
Perhaps even more than you think... Loads for our (admittedly much reduced) operation yesterday out of a North Eastern Hub were in excess of 80%...
Airports are still quiet, but people are flying....
neilki is offline  
Old 15th May 2020, 13:34
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: earth
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mass tourism can’t start until reasonably priced travel insurance, covering covid19, is available. Don’t hold your breath.
Walrus1 is offline  
Old 15th May 2020, 13:54
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 941
Received 26 Likes on 10 Posts
Yes, but they won’t be flying to Aus or NZ on QA,VA or NZ aircraft be they 777 or whatever the media is trying to speculate on for VA. That is what I meant by my concern for the US. It seems America is going to let covid rip across the country so I can’t see down under opening up any boarders to our Seppo mates in the next 12-18 months minimum. The media in Oz have been digging up some old plans to replace their 777s. I can’t see what Virgin Australia are going to do with their 777 Now let alone think about replacing them.
ozbiggles is offline  
Old 15th May 2020, 21:18
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 80
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by ozbiggles
Yes, but they won’t be flying to Aus or NZ on QA
No such airline
Chris2303 is online now  
Old 16th May 2020, 05:13
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There would probably be a 1-2 year lead time to get a 787 program operational so the 777s can hang around for the moment. A330 fleet all leased and can go right now.
wheels_down is offline  
Old 16th May 2020, 06:27
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sydney
Age: 41
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I actually think the creditors will be going for every cent they can get. That includes selling the fully owned 777 frames, even if it means they go dirt cheap.
normanton is offline  
Old 16th May 2020, 22:17
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Skating away on the thin ice of a new day.
Posts: 1,116
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by normanton
I actually think the creditors will be going for every cent they can get. That includes selling the fully owned 777 frames, even if it means they go dirt cheap.
I think they will have that as one of their plans. Cover all possibilities.

I guess it could depend on what the remaining prospective buyers have in mind. We all know international flying will be a long time coming back to anywhere near pre-covid days.

So, despite the 777s being owned, can they justify hanging on to them 'just in case" OS flying opens up?

Keep them in mothballs indefinitely hoping for an improved market, try to sell them soon at fire sale prices into what must be a massively over supplied used airframe market, or hang and sell upon some recovery?

None are ideal by any stretch.

Like most in the industry I think domestic flying should kick off much sooner than OS flying in any scale.

Are new owners interested in OS flying at all? Is a south Pacific bubble really viable and can that justify keeping the 777s to compete with Air NZ and Qantas?

A lot of crystal ball stuff that's beyond me.
ampclamp is offline  
Old 16th May 2020, 23:02
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many large corporate contracts Virgin have require USA travel. A large chunk of the corporate revenue will go if they drop USA. They were approaching 40% Corp share (growing, QF falling, does not get a mention anywhere) here so it’s largely a big hit to the bottom line that also then flows to domestic, should they axe the states. Pretty vital piece of the puzzle.

New Zealand is the cash burner and not so reliant on Corp traffic.

777 fleet is 80% owned. One can go, some heavy checks can probably take place forward to burn time.
wheels_down is offline  
Old 16th May 2020, 23:18
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: melbourne
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the Administrators can get the Financial institutions who have loaned money against the B777's to take a haircut then yes they will own them. No real secondary market in wide-bodies right now with Leasing companies offering refinancing at low numbers on the dollar. Not a time to sell them really if they can avoid it. USA won't open up for a long time to Australia though so no where to fly them except on freight operations. As for bringing forward the Heavy maintenance that is the last thing you want to do for cash flow purposes. Every time you open a 12 year aircraft up in a C Check you can expect some nasty surprises. I am sure the Administrator doesn't want to deal with that.... Once they are right to operate to the USA though they may be too big for purpose. Let's hope that this COVID issue comes to an end and things can start to get back to 80% of what was happening before by late next year. I don't like the chances though.
coaldemon is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.