Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Seniority

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st May 2020, 08:10
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Green.Dot
There appears to be a few people who seem to be “gleeful” about the potential redundancy scenario going off fleet or by pure seniority. Let’s not forget that if and where the axe falls it is going to be painful for those involved. Let’s just hope it doesn’t it happen.
I will only be gleeful if Normanton gets the arse. Every other S/O has my sympathy and support
mohikan is offline  
Old 31st May 2020, 08:15
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sydney
Age: 41
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mohikan
I will only be gleeful if Normanton gets the arse. Every other S/O has my sympathy and support
Just not with your vote.

You sound like one of those names people see on the roster, and decide to head for the hills instead.
normanton is offline  
Old 31st May 2020, 09:20
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 77
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mohikan
I will only be gleeful if Normanton gets the arse. Every other S/O has my sympathy and support
Yet in the other forum you said this...

I wont be agreeing to any pay cuts to save Normanton and other S/Os

Can you clarify this please? I’m confused
skysook is offline  
Old 31st May 2020, 09:49
  #124 (permalink)  
ABP
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Sydney
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Standing down staff indefinitely is not in line with Fair Work I believe. Stand down is only for a short-term stoppage of work beyond a company's control, not a lengthy downturn resulting in a long-term reduced schedule. Items like job-sharing or voluntary redundancy should occur first to reduce the surplus, and then potentially forced redundancies. But I'm sure all avenues will be looked at first by the unions to secure as many jobs as possible.
ABP is offline  
Old 31st May 2020, 09:57
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,298
Received 356 Likes on 195 Posts
Originally Posted by ABP
Standing down staff indefinitely is not in line with Fair Work I believe. Stand down is only for a short-term stoppage of work beyond a company's control, not a lengthy downturn resulting in a long-term reduced schedule.
How long is short-term? It's complicated. Potentially up to 2.5 years, the training freeze? It could be said retraining crew would be cost prohibitive if the plan is to have those crew back on their original aircraft within that freeze period.

Or if it involves circumstances beyond the control of the company, one could say the government travel restrictions to various countries are an example of that, and crew will be stood down until those restrictions are removed and prior passenger loads return.

Last edited by dr dre; 31st May 2020 at 10:11.
dr dre is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2020, 06:30
  #126 (permalink)  
ABP
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Sydney
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's the point. It won't be a time related stand down once a permanent fleet reduction adjustment is made. Qantas won't stand down employees while it mulls an aircraft order that isn't guaranteed whilst operating a smaller start-up international network based on weak global demand, as this is not the Fair Work definition for stand down. Who knows how it'll look. I was addressing the fact that to think everyone will be stood down indefinitely until a position is re-offered is unlikely based on the legislation. However, I do not know everything inside and out of course!
ABP is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2020, 10:41
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: HKG
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It’s all good, they have found some more work for the A380s...

Green.Dot is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2020, 11:08
  #128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,298
Received 356 Likes on 195 Posts
Originally Posted by ABP
That's the point. It won't be a time related stand down once a permanent fleet reduction adjustment is made.
Recent management statements indicate, beyond the already known to be departing 747s the rest of the fleet will basically remain intact for the forseeable future, so a similar number of crew flying them today will be needed to fly them in the short to mid term. And demand may pick up quite slowly, but then suddenly boom, so it's hard to make an accurate judgment of required crew numbers per fleet in the medium term.
dr dre is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2020, 02:46
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: TIBA
Posts: 461
Received 129 Likes on 37 Posts
Originally Posted by dr dre
Recent management statements...
How many management statements have proved accurate over the last 15 years?
CaptCloudbuster is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2020, 03:19
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by CaptCloudbuster
How many management statements have proved accurate over the last 15 years?
Many many more than the countering opinions of the PPRune conspiracy theorists.
crosscutter is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.