Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Air NZ pilot redundancies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jun 2020, 00:53
  #361 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Denmark
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well either way, to be on any international fleet wether at Virgin, QANTAS, AirNZ or Jetstar there will be downsizing by how much who knows. I was referencing Domestic I do t think QF or JQ will get rid of to many from what I have seen over the last week people want to holiday and soon as borders open the gradual increase will commence. Jetstar already ran a lean ship always relied on WOD payments to crew flights so maybe they could have the right numbers. Virgin will be smaller that’s the only definite at the moment and QF will be ready to pick up the slack.
Ragnor is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2020, 00:59
  #362 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,625
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
Originally Posted by cloudsurfng
do you have a guesstimate on the number? I would have thought around 300-350
I was thinking a bit higher however it depends if they choose to shaft the Jetstar 787 pilots as they are cheaper to make redundant then repaint those aircraft in Qantas colours and crew them with Qantas pilots. As I see things jobkeeper at the moment finishes on September 30 Qantas is required to give 90 days notice of redundancies, so I’m thinking October it will start and it won’t only be pilots.
dragon man is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2020, 01:10
  #363 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,432
Received 207 Likes on 69 Posts
I think Jetstar will handle it by not re-opening bases, it is in the EBA and the CEA in NZ that pilots can be made redundant according to effected BASES and RANK and EQUIPMENT so it would be easy to say, CNS, PER and CHC won’t reopen. It seems to be the way they are going as all planned flying at the moment and for the foreseeable future is out of the main bases.
Ollie Onion is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2020, 01:11
  #364 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 303
Received 75 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by dragon man
I was thinking a bit higher however it depends if they choose to shaft the Jetstar 787 pilots as they are cheaper to make redundant then repaint those aircraft in Qantas colours and crew them with Qantas pilots. As I see things jobkeeper at the moment finishes on September 30 Qantas is required to give 90 days notice of redundancies, so I’m thinking October it will start and it won’t only be pilots.
are you referring to group wide as higher or mainline? I was thinking 300-350 mainline. Unaware of anything relating to JQ 787...are they going?

just so sad for everyone...no matter your tail. Look after each other, call a mate, whatever. China have a lot to answer for.
cloudsurfng is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2020, 01:20
  #365 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 9 Posts
the number I've heard being circulated is 400 in QF mainline.
Chad Gates is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2020, 01:32
  #366 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You guys are just speculating rubbish.

QF haven’t made a pilot redundant in most of our lifetimes.

There is a demographic problem at the top with retirements this decade from lack of recruitment. There is also the stand down provisions in the eba to cover any surpluses.

So my guess is there will be a bit of fruit offered to the 747 guys to avoid an expensive RIN. Everyone else will roster share and the use of stand down will be applied for as long as needed.

Shorthaul will be largely back at work by the fourth quarter.

Jetstar? Who knows. But it’s a lesson to put all your eggs in the Bali basket. The entire operation is exposed to any hiccups over there. It’ll be a volcano next. Those 787s would come in mighty handy on the QF 2 crew network in the future. Jakarta, Bali, transcontinental, NZ etc.
Blueskymine is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2020, 01:33
  #367 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 303
Received 75 Likes on 30 Posts
Mate I hope you’re right

all depends on the plan they e just come up with. AIPA will know next week

anyway, apologies to the ANZ crew.

I hope you guys and girls can have some certainty soon.
cloudsurfng is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2020, 04:57
  #368 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 2,289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KiwiAvi8er
She ticks all the diversity boxes so she won't be going anywhere. During the search for the new CEO her name had popped up in a few conversations, thank christ that never eventuated.
I understand from a few mates that her last stint as a CEO (Eagle GM) didn't go all that well. I heard a bit of "Stitching" was prescribed in an attempt to rebuild the relationships with staff.
27/09 is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2020, 05:03
  #369 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Every employee group at Air NZ, who has had Carrie as a manager has been shafted and disrespected in some way. Just look at her run in with the engineers early last year.
She destroyed the moral at Eagle, and had a total lack of respect for the CEA with her novel interpretations of long standing clauses.

I wouldn’t trust her as far as I could throw her.

Last edited by 6080ft; 7th Jun 2020 at 05:05. Reason: Typo
6080ft is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2020, 06:18
  #370 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: At Home
Posts: 397
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by 6080ft
Every employee group at Air NZ, who has had Carrie as a manager has been shafted and disrespected in some way. Just look at her run in with the engineers early last year.
She destroyed the moral at Eagle, and had a total lack of respect for the CEA with her novel interpretations of long standing clauses.

I wouldn’t trust her as far as I could throw her.
This is my biggest concern. Her “management” style is confrontational and vindictive, almost like a spoiled teenager trying to get their way. I fear she’ll do more damage to the Relationship between Pilots and Management than COVID will.

Look at the engineers. They worked tirelessly to keep us operating through the RR engine debacle only to have their overtime attacked and select details of their CEA released to the media out of context to garner public support.

HPE was already on life support, I’d say she’s about to kill it.
ElZilcho is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2020, 06:43
  #371 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ElZilcho
This is my biggest concern. Her “management” style is confrontational and vindictive, almost like a spoiled teenager trying to get their way. I fear she’ll do more damage to the Relationship between Pilots and Management than COVID will.

Look at the engineers. They worked tirelessly to keep us operating through the RR engine debacle only to have their overtime attacked and select details of their CEA released to the media out of context to garner public support.

HPE was already on life support, I’d say she’s about to kill it.
Totally agree. Her behaviour was totally contrary to the code of conduct. Oh but guess who the code of conduct does not cover?!!
6080ft is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2020, 07:30
  #372 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 551
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by ElZilcho
Her “management” style is confrontational and vindictive, almost like a spoiled teenager trying to get their way.
She would get a gig at Qantas no problems
Kiwiconehead is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2020, 08:18
  #373 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has anyone seen the latest of BA? Im just worried that the company might take more drastic action and make a heap of redundancies and rehire on a completely new contract or get rid of people by fleet if no one is willing to come to the party for short term concessions.
Kiwi9 is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2020, 09:50
  #374 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: At Home
Posts: 397
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Kiwi9
Has anyone seen the latest of BA? Im just worried that the company might take more drastic action and make a heap of redundancies and rehire on a completely new contract or get rid of people by fleet if no one is willing to come to the party for short term concessions.
Our CEA prevents either from happening. They could of course take it up with ERA, particularly Seniority, but that will cost both time and money. I agree, backing them into a corner would be ill-advisable, but as ALPA said in today's email, we're the only Unionised group (so far) that has agreed to a Salary reduction on top of Redundancies and included Furlough into our CEA to reduce the immediate cost of those Redundancies.

Will they ask for a higher % Salary reduction for the next 3 months in accordance with the AFFA table? Or will they ask specific fleet/ranks to "voluntarily" take LWOP? Hard to say. As they can crew the (few) Widebodies with Capt's and FO's, perhaps they'll pressure the SO's (under fear of rendundancy) to accept 3 months LWOP. Time will tell I suppose, but if we accept Greg's email as written, he sees further redundancies as a last resort (as they too cost time and money before having any effect).
ElZilcho is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2020, 23:01
  #375 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: 3rd Rock
Posts: 396
Received 106 Likes on 49 Posts
Originally Posted by 6080ft
Every employee group at Air NZ, who has had Carrie as a manager has been shafted and disrespected in some way. Just look at her run in with the engineers early last year.
She destroyed the moral at Eagle, and had a total lack of respect for the CEA with her novel interpretations of long standing clauses.

I wouldn’t trust her as far as I could throw her.
Is this the Carrie H who supposedly held a 'close relationship' with a certain NZ exec (who long ago departed for Airways) for her rise out of nothingness?
How the hell is that incompetent woman still on the payroll?
Lapon is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2020, 07:50
  #376 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Earth
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Regional pilots are to be back on full pay from next roster with the RAFFA agreement ending due to being back to over 60% July 2019 capacity. Due to inefficiencies in the schedule that is a requirement for 85% the crew they had July 2019 already.
viatheairporthold is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2020, 07:54
  #377 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: NOYB
Posts: 84
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by viatheairporthold
Regional pilots are to be back on full pay from next roster with the RAFFA agreement ending due to being back to over 60% July 2019 capacity. Due to inefficiencies in the schedule that is a requirement for 85% the crew they had July 2019 already.
Correct. But their RAFFA doesn't have the same clauses in there that the Jet AFFA does for the returning of their redundant/furloughed pilots.

For the Jets, when the rosters hit (or are set to hit) 60 hours, then redundant/furloughed pilots must be brought back to reduce it below 60 hours. And only WHEN all redundant/furloughed pilots have returned, can they cancel the AFFA, should it still be in place.

It is unfortunate that the RAFFA didn't retain similar wording, because now there are 50-odd guys and girls struggling to find supermarket jobs while the people just above them on the seniority are back on full-time pay and rosters.
InZed is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2020, 08:07
  #378 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Earth
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes that is unfortunate, I assume that means the deferred crew who kept their jobs for the life of the RAFFA are now safe (for now at least), but my understanding is there is no clear wording regarding them either once the RAFFA is canned. It would be interesting to see how many new pilots started since July 2019 so we can gauge how many pilots '85% July 2019' actually is.
viatheairporthold is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2020, 08:10
  #379 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: NOYB
Posts: 84
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by viatheairporthold
Yes that is unfortunate, I assume that means the deferred crew who kept their jobs for the life of the RAFFA are now safe (for now at least), but my understanding is there is no clear wording regarding them either once the RAFFA is canned. It would be interesting to see how many new pilots started since July 2019 so we can gauge how many pilots '85% July 2019' actually is.
Just found the info from a mate. Apparently:
578 pilots on the RSL as of 8th July 2019.
621 total including a group starting in March 2020.
InZed is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2020, 09:23
  #380 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Earth
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok so 85% of July 2019 crewing requirements means they currently need 491 pilots but I guess if things continue to improve that could increase reasonably quickly
viatheairporthold is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.