Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Government Loan to Virgin Australia

Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Government Loan to Virgin Australia

Old 19th May 2020, 09:36
  #1221 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: BAO
Posts: 486
Originally Posted by Blackout View Post
We are all in this 'together' ! Secured, Unsecured ..etc!!

https://www.afr.com/companies/transp...0200519-p54ugi
Mr 'Blackout'- bloody PayWall on 'that' sucker............

Any 'Cut & Paste' solution/action- at your disposal..?? or a summary thereof.......

Rgds- ("Gas turbine blades of conventional rotorcraft turboshaft engines.....")
S28- BE
Section28- BE is offline  
Old 19th May 2020, 09:42
  #1222 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: BAO
Posts: 486
Sharp/preemptive/intuitive.................. Cool.

So having read the article-

Can we deploy all these various reserves/cash (encumbered or not)/equity/funding options (spoken of on numerous occasions) to meet the debts as and when they fall due.......????- Yes or No

ta/Rgds
S28

Last edited by Section28- BE; 19th May 2020 at 10:34. Reason: read the article............
Section28- BE is offline  
Old 19th May 2020, 10:19
  #1223 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 197
https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/202005...52jrnl1f11.pdfSydney, May 18, 2020 -- Moody's Investors Service has today downgraded Virgin Australia Holdings Limited's Corporate Family Rating to Ca from Caa1. Concurrently, Moody's has downgraded Virgin's senior unsecured and backed senior unsecured ratings to C from Caa2, and its backed senior unsecured MTN program to (P)C from (P)Caa2.

RATIONALE:

The rapid and widening spread of the coronavirus outbreak, deteriorating global economic outlook, falling oil prices, and asset price declines are creating a severe and extensive credit shock across many sectors, regions and markets. The combined credit effects of these developments are unprecedented. The airline sector has been one of the sectors most significantly affected by the shock given its sensitivity to consumer demand and sentiment. More specifically, the weaknesses in Virgin's credit profile, including its exposure to global demand for travel, have left it vulnerable to shifts in market sentiment in these unprecedented operating conditions. We regard the coronavirus outbreak as a social risk under our ESG framework, given the substantial implications for public health and safety. Today's action reflects the impact on Virgin of the breadth and severity of the shock, and the broad deterioration in credit quality it has triggered.

The rating action was prompted by Virgin missing the coupon payment on 15 May 2020 of its USD425 million 8.125% 2024 bonds, after entering into voluntary administration on 21 April 2020.


So realistically, not only do they have to service their debt, they have to run a profit V2.0 from the word go...Otherwise its more debt!

Deep Pockets

Last edited by Blackout; 19th May 2020 at 12:25. Reason: Link - Point
Blackout is offline  
Old 19th May 2020, 10:49
  #1224 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 247
Originally Posted by PoppaJo View Post
What is most disturbing is the comment that the process is on ĎVirgin Managementísí agendaí. They need to rid themselves of this Management and start again. It seems Virginís Management team will be selecting the winning bidder. Wonít be Bain then, as Carla would wipe them all out.
It's a decidedly odd administration, that's for sure. A bit like having Captain Schettino managing the Costa Concordia's salvage operation.

It seems that high on the list of assessment criteria for the sale is 'Buys into Virgin v2.0 (Full service domestic + international +LCC Qantas Mini-Me) business model (aka the Scurrah-Strawbridge Delusion). And you get the sense that 'Retains current management team' is also towards the top of the criteria along with 'Minimises job losses'. Pesky stuff like the financials hasn't been getting much in the way of airplay.

In terms of the financials you can run the numbers on the back of napkin to get a feel for what this deal has to looks like.

Any prospective new owner buying into 'the Delusion' is going to have to be able to take on about $3 billion in debt and liabilities. That will be comprised of $1.5 billion of the currently $2.3 billion in secured debt plus around $1 billion in leases (roughly half of the current $1.9 billion). The other half billion is the employee entitlements that will simply be rolled over as a liability.

Then there's what needs to be stumped up in cash. If you're going to continue trading with the current landlords and supplier base, you are not going to be able to stiff them on what was owing when the business went into administration. That's $235 million. The unsecured bond holders aren't going to take much less than 20 cents on the dollar, so that's another $400 million. So, that's the best part of $650 million just to open the doors again.

You then have the vexed matter of recapitalising the business. That will be about $1 billion in cash or cash equivalents plus sufficient float to cover a very likely first year loss. If the new owner decides to honour the travel credits issued the loss could easily run to $500 million; if they don't they might squeeze by with a loss in the double-digit millions, it just depends on how much they bleed market share by not honouring the credit vouchers.

So the deal looks like $5 billion in cash and debt and that's before you even think about buying out the current equity. One dollar sounds like the right price but I suspect it could go up to around the $100 million mark.

Call the deal $5 billion and change.

It is probably instructive that the crowd with half a trillion under management, Brookfield, walked away on Monday. They were being advised by Virgin's former Chief Financial Officer. I wonder if they know something the rest of us don't.

Any old how, from a financial perspective, Bain could probably manage the $5.x billion. A deal like this would double Cyrus's assets under management so, short of finding a deep-pocketed partner, they'd have to struggle to make the cut I would think. It would also be a stretch for Indigo. BGH would also struggle to come up with $5 billion unless it lent heavily on AustralianSuper (and I'm trying to picture what that investment case would look like - it would have to be heavily weighted towards making a return on a subsequent public float).

Back on the philosophy criteria, BGH is the only proponent likely to buy into 'the Delusion' and look to retain Scurrah and Co. Cyrus and Indigo would not go near that business model. Bain might but I doubt it, and in any event Bain would be handing Schettino and the bridge crew their hats just as quickly as the could replace them.

I think that this thing will quickly come down to whether BGH can fund the transaction. That in turn comes down to whether AustralianSuper will stump up the required coin. And it's likely that Bain, Cyrus and Indigo will pretty quickly join the dots on how important embracing 'the Delusion' is to a successful outcome (probably the day that they meet with management and the unions) and realise that their money is better spent elsewhere.

And now, there's the added complication of whether the administrator has enough cash to run the sale process while remaining solvent. Like all good circuses there's plenty to see ... and no shortage of clowns.

MickG0105 is offline  
Old 19th May 2020, 11:32
  #1225 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: deutschland
Posts: 68
Why would anyone buy the debt now, when it will no longer be a factor if receivers are appointed and firesale the assets to a new starter. Everyone is too focused on a resurrection rather than a genuine re-birth.
Con Catenator is offline  
Old 19th May 2020, 11:48
  #1226 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 727
Originally Posted by MickG0105 View Post
It's a decidedly odd administration, that's for sure. A bit like having Captain Schettino managing the Costa Concordia's salvage operation.

It seems that high on the list of assessment criteria for the sale is 'Buys into Virgin v2.0 (Full service domestic + international +LCC Qantas Mini-Me) business model (aka the Scurrah-Strawbridge Delusion). And you get the sense that 'Retains current management team' is also towards the top of the criteria along with 'Minimises job losses'. Pesky stuff like the financials hasn't been getting much in the way of airplay.

In terms of the financials you can run the numbers on the back of napkin to get a feel for what this deal has to looks like.

Any prospective new owner buying into 'the Delusion' is going to have to be able to take on about $3 billion in debt and liabilities. That will be comprised of $1.5 billion of the currently $2.3 billion in secured debt plus around $1 billion in leases (roughly half of the current $1.9 billion). The other half billion is the employee entitlements that will simply be rolled over as a liability.

Then there's what needs to be stumped up in cash. If you're going to continue trading with the current landlords and supplier base, you are not going to be able to stiff them on what was owing when the business went into administration. That's $235 million. The unsecured bond holders aren't going to take much less than 20 cents on the dollar, so that's another $400 million. So, that's the best part of $650 million just to open the doors again.

You then have the vexed matter of recapitalising the business. That will be about $1 billion in cash or cash equivalents plus sufficient float to cover a very likely first year loss. If the new owner decides to honour the travel credits issued the loss could easily run to $500 million; if they don't they might squeeze by with a loss in the double-digit millions, it just depends on how much they bleed market share by not honouring the credit vouchers.

So the deal looks like $5 billion in cash and debt and that's before you even think about buying out the current equity. One dollar sounds like the right price but I suspect it could go up to around the $100 million mark.

Call the deal $5 billion and change.

It is probably instructive that the crowd with half a trillion under management, Brookfield, walked away on Monday. They were being advised by Virgin's former Chief Financial Officer. I wonder if they know something the rest of us don't.

Any old how, from a financial perspective, Bain could probably manage the $5.x billion. A deal like this would double Cyrus's assets under management so, short of finding a deep-pocketed partner, they'd have to struggle to make the cut I would think. It would also be a stretch for Indigo. BGH would also struggle to come up with $5 billion unless it lent heavily on AustralianSuper (and I'm trying to picture what that investment case would look like - it would have to be heavily weighted towards making a return on a subsequent public float).

Back on the philosophy criteria, BGH is the only proponent likely to buy into 'the Delusion' and look to retain Scurrah and Co. Cyrus and Indigo would not go near that business model. Bain might but I doubt it, and in any event Bain would be handing Schettino and the bridge crew their hats just as quickly as the could replace them.

I think that this thing will quickly come down to whether BGH can fund the transaction. That in turn comes down to whether AustralianSuper will stump up the required coin. And it's likely that Bain, Cyrus and Indigo will pretty quickly join the dots on how important embracing 'the Delusion' is to a successful outcome (probably the day that they meet with management and the unions) and realise that their money is better spent elsewhere.

And now, there's the added complication of whether the administrator has enough cash to run the sale process while remaining solvent. Like all good circuses there's plenty to see ... and no shortage of clowns.

As I've said before love your work, think it's as good as any on the forums.

Question I'd have - and maybe already asked in a similar way - as the whole show seems to be deteriorating at a great rate of knots how long before the administrator (deloittes) places the whole thing into liquidation to ensure the administrator (deloittes) do not incur costs against themselves...as apparently in administration they're meant to be controlling the finances therefore are responsible for the same??
What - if anything - would be the trigger??

Cheers
galdian is online now  
Old 19th May 2020, 11:49
  #1227 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 927
But does a rebirth require a new AOC? (another 12 months...)

What - if anything - would be the trigger??

Cheers
Canberra saying no I guess. Which they did the previous ten times I donít see why last night would have been any different.
wheels_down is offline  
Old 19th May 2020, 12:38
  #1228 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 247
Originally Posted by wheels_down View Post
But does a rebirth require a new AOC? (another 12 months...)


Canberra saying no I guess. Which they did the previous ten times I donít see why last night would have been any different.
Definitely not my area of expertise but if Virgin is liquidated, the AOC goes with it, doesn't it? That's one of, if not the overwhelming attractions of maintaining the business as a going concern; you preserve the AOC.
MickG0105 is offline  
Old 19th May 2020, 13:04
  #1229 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: space
Posts: 352
S28- BE makes less sense than Yoda. Follow his posts you can? Hmmmmm? Write clearly or do not there is no try!
zanthrus is offline  
Old 19th May 2020, 13:36
  #1230 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 247
Originally Posted by galdian View Post
As I've said before love your work, think it's as good as any on the forums.
Thank you. That's back of the fag packet stuff but I think that the quanta are about right.

One thing I missed above was Temasek's reported tie up with BGH. That might make the funding easier to manage.

Originally Posted by galdian View Post
Question I'd have - and maybe already asked in a similar way - as the whole show seems to be deteriorating at a great rate of knots how long before the administrator (deloittes) places the whole thing into liquidation to ensure the administrator (deloittes) do not incur costs against themselves...as apparently in administration they're meant to be controlling the finances therefore are responsible for the same??
What - if anything - would be the trigger??

Cheers
Good question. Deloitte have been studiously making applications to the Federal Court to minimise their liabilities. Even so, there must be some concerns amongst their Restructuring Services partners that they are far more exposed on this administration than pretty much anything else they've taken on recently.

I think that Deloitte would have some well articulated risk management guidance and thresholds that would be relevant in a circumstance like this.

Perhaps the thing that would be front of mind for Deloitte is their assessment of just how doable a sale is. They've got to come up with a deed of company arrangement that is amenable to a buyer. At the end of the day the sale will only occur if they can get the debt to a position that a buyer is happy with. That means corralling the creditors. They should already have a sense of the creditors' opening positions on what they'll accept. Having just received non-binding offers they'll have a view as to prospective buyers' appetites for debt. There'll be a gap between the two positions and Deloitte should have a professional view as to whether that gap can be closed such that a deal is possible. They'll have an evolving view as to whether they're in the Go Zone for a deal. If they ever get too far out of that zone they'll have to call time.

The fact that Deloitte are already rattling their cup and we're only just into the short-list phase of the sale process does not augur well. The fact that the bidders know that Deloitte is rattling the cup does not augur well. Same same with Brookfield walking early.

Equally worrying is the way this thing is playing out as a public spectacle. Generally speaking the most successful commercial deals are the ones that you read about for the first time after they've concluded. Clearly Deloitte can't run this whole thing under the radar given that Scurrah ran the lead up to the administration in full view but Deloitte have got to try to get the machinations out of the papers for at least a couple of days at a time.
MickG0105 is offline  
Old 19th May 2020, 14:38
  #1231 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 10,524
I bet they wish that KM had their Administration now...
Buster Hyman is online now  
Old 19th May 2020, 22:29
  #1232 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: In the Cab
Posts: 77
Why would they want Korda?
Double_Clutch is offline  
Old 19th May 2020, 22:44
  #1233 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Around Here
Posts: 13
I think that Deloitte would have some well articulated risk management guidance and thresholds that would be relevant in a circumstance like this.
Spot on - Deloittes will have to be very careful with this one - I would not be surprised if they walk away (read call in the receivers) if there is even a sniff of running beyond the limited cash remaining. The government should not touch this with a barge pole, and commercial imperatives must be allowed to run their course.

Forced Labor is offline  
Old 20th May 2020, 03:27
  #1234 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 10,524
Originally Posted by Double_Clutch View Post
Why would they want Korda?
Sorry, I meant that about Deloittes.
Buster Hyman is online now  
Old 21st May 2020, 12:23
  #1235 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 927
Today they want $238m. Who knows what the figure will be tomorrow.

Virgin Australia administrators eye $238m in restricted cash to help keep the airline flying

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.the...2a4f82ea621f31
wheels_down is offline  
Old 21st May 2020, 12:52
  #1236 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: In the Cab
Posts: 77
Restricted cash - how can they access it if it is restricted? Surely it’s “restricted” for a reason.
Who deems it restricted? The company, law or the administrators?
All seems a little prickly to me?
Double_Clutch is offline  
Old 21st May 2020, 14:55
  #1237 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 197
Originally Posted by Double_Clutch View Post
Restricted cash - how can they access it if it is restricted? Surely itís ďrestrictedĒ for a reason.
Who deems it restricted? The company, law or the administrators?
All seems a little prickly to me?

https://corporatefinanceinstitute.co...stricted-cash/

Time will tell!
Blackout is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 07:06
  #1238 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 247
From today's The Australian
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/bus...7s/news-story/

Scurrah urges Virgin reboot with 737s
By ROBYN IRONSIDE12:00AM MAY 22, 2020

Virgin Australia CEO Paul Scurrah has told prospective buyers of the carrier the best way forward is to rebuild the business as a domestic airline with a strong frequent-flyer program.

The 20-year-old airline went into voluntary administration on April 20 with debts of $6.8bn, sparking a flood of interest from prospective buyers.

Four bidders were short-listed on Monday including Bain, BGH Capital, Indigo Partners and Cyrus Capital.

In a series of three-hour presentations to two of the bidders on Thursday, with two to follow on Friday, Mr Scurrah outlined how the airline could prosper by ditching its hodgepodge fleet of aircraft for a line-up of Boeing 737s. The domestic network could be rebuilt from scratch focusing on high-demand, lucrative routes, while international services and low-cost carrier Tigerair would be “optional extras”.

Costly contracts with Wi-Fi providers and caterers would be up for negotiation, presenting opportunities for significant savings.

As Mr Scurrah outlined the possibilities for Virgin 2, administrator Deloitte hosted the first committee-of-inspection meeting with 35 creditor representatives including unions, airports, banks, bondholders and suppliers. They were told of the increasing urgency for further funding to keep Virgin Australia flying. With government subsidies for flights due to come to an end on June 11, administrators revealed they were exploring various avenues for financial assistance including state governments and commercial lenders.

Although an existing $100m in cash was expected to see the airline through till the end of July, concern centred on Virgin Australia’s ability to ramp up to keep pace with rival Qantas. The meeting heard administrators were eyeing up to $238m in restricted cash, tied up against hedging and in merchant and credit card facilities.

Failing that, Deloitte also suggested to the committee one of the final two bidders could enter into some funding arrangement before settlement — precisely the scenario that scared off Brookfield.

It also emerged on Thursday that a group of restructuring experts calling itself Australia Connected Aviation Partners approached Virgin Australia’s administrator last week with a plan they believed best protected the interests of creditors in the administration process.

ACAP is being bankrolled by American entrepreneur Augie Fabela, the co-founder of the New York Stock Exchange-listed VEON, the seventh largest mobile phone operator in the world boasting $US22bn ($33.5bn) in revenues. Mr Fabela was also the chairman of the Koenigsegg Group, which acquired Swedish vehicle maker Saab more than a decade ago from General Motors.

In the ACAP team are three former EY partners who have started their own turnaround services business known as Spiique, which last year worked with *Deloitte’s Vaughan Strawbridge on the rescue of Axsesstoday, a publicly listed SME lender that went into voluntary administration.

Also in ACAP’s ranks is Dermot Mannion — former CEO at Aer Lingus and deputy chairman of Royal Brunei Airlines — and former AMP bank CEO Sally Bruce.

“The concern of our team is that there will be a financial restructure of Virgin done quickly that will disenfranchise creditors who have seen value destroyed. You could end up with a very valuable business that somebody hasn’t had to pay for,’’ said Spiique co-founder David Hewish, noting ACAP had already held discussions with Virgin creditors.

Under its recapitalision plan for the airline, Virgin’s unsecured creditors would be given the option to convert all or a portion of their debt into equity; roll over their debt on a “standstill basis” or elect to receive a cash payment. New senior notes would be issued together with a potential equity component to investors underwriting the note offering.

“We certainly believe there is room to develop a plan B solution for Virgin. Fixing the business is the missing element in the current process,” Mr Hewish said. “The current tight timeline doesn’t give the business a chance to work with the stakeholders and come up with a plan.”
'Mr Scurrah outlined how the airline could prosper by ditching its hodgepodge fleet of aircraft for a line-up of Boeing 737s.' From Mr Oblivious to Captain Obvious. I wonder if there was a phone booth and a costume change involved? It would have been interesting to watch Paul Scurrah explaining to Bill Franke how an airline should be run.

Separately, the emergence of Australia Connected Aviation Partners can't be good for Deloitte's hit-and-run sale process. If ACAP can get the bondholders on board Deloitte could very easily be well and truly out of cash before a sale can be finalised.

Last edited by MickG0105; 22nd May 2020 at 07:10. Reason: Formatting
MickG0105 is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 08:32
  #1239 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Coal Face
Posts: 614
Originally Posted by MickG0105 View Post
Does he mean the 737 MAX?

Forbes
Chronic Snoozer is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 08:44
  #1240 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 247
Originally Posted by Chronic Snoozer View Post
Does he mean the 737 MAX?

Forbes
Anyone's guess. If you were starting with a blank sheet of paper and were totally unconcerned about the potential for the reputational hangover impacting market share, the MAX 8 and 10 would logically figure in your plans given the legacy fleet.
MickG0105 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.