Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

A DEBATE THAT MUST BE HAD

Old 27th Mar 2020, 04:35
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 608
Received 67 Likes on 27 Posts
Sunfish, you’ve made a number of recent posts about QF that haven’t included the specific word ‘Sydneycentric’ (if indeed it is a word). Could you please revert to normal practice? It’s spoiling the drinking game we’ve got going here.
itsnotthatbloodyhard is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2020, 05:12
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sydney
Age: 41
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sunfish
Open the skies. Cut Qantas loose. We paid a premium to these Sydney thieves for thirty years. Qantas COSTS more jobs than its worth.
Back into that man cave thanks mate. You speak utter rubbish.
normanton is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2020, 21:08
  #63 (permalink)  
ABP
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Sydney
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by longjohn
So are we propping up Optus as well if it starts to wobble?
How about Coles or Woolies?
Yes I think they should! However, if one folds, it does not leave a monopoly. If VA or QF fold, it would. Aviation is a different industry that has a wide industry and consumer impact if a monopoly was to prevail.
ABP is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2020, 07:47
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: home with mum and the kids
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do not subscribe to the evil monopoly theory.

Firstly, you are talking Qantas Domestic and Jetstar Domestic?

Qantas International has competition, if anything VAI is barely worth mentioning in this regard.
QantasLink has REX
Network has Cobham, Skippers and Alliance.

So regulate them, or force them to sell Jetstar.

Efficient solutions that do not involve propping up inefficient foreign owned businesses with my tax $$
longjohn is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2020, 21:06
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 78
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by longjohn
So regulate them, or force them to sell Jetstar.
Sell JQ and it will close. There is too much provided to JQ by QF off balance sheet that JQ would never be able to afford
Chris2303 is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2020, 03:57
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how does QF subsidise JQ domestically? We’ve all heard the rumours about international losing money/being propped up by QF but I don’t think many people doubt the Aussie domestic operation is highly profitable
ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2020, 04:21
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: East of Eden
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
S&P has effectively placed VAH on a CCC credit watch with uncertainty and there may be questions of group survival beyond June with the existing cash reserves.

In view of the deputy PM's comments this morning about not nationalising airlines, if the government wants a competitive airline sector, this may present somewhat of a challenge.
Des Dimona is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2020, 19:23
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 78
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE
how does QF subsidise JQ domestically? We’ve all heard the rumours about international losing money/being propped up by QF but I don’t think many people doubt the Aussie domestic operation is highly profitable
It's been discussed on here before about maintenance and fuel being charged to QF
Chris2303 is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2020, 21:25
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris2303
It's been discussed on here before about maintenance and fuel being charged to QF
So because it’s been discussed on PPRUNE it has to true!!

with tiger essentially disappearing, JQ will be the sole LCC in the Aussie market. QF needs JQ to stop another operator setting up shop in Australia. We’ve already seen off TT and virgin blue so we must be doing something right.

JQ ain’t going anywhere
ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2020, 22:46
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: NSW
Posts: 74
Received 32 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE
So because it’s been discussed on PPRUNE it has to true!!
and yet you posed the initial question to this forum?
ddrwk is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2020, 23:02
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ddrwk
and yet you posed the initial question to this forum?
thats a fair point!

I guess what I was getting at was that there are some ideas that have been discussed so many times that guys convince themselves that they are facts.

My counter point would be why would qantas prop up a loss making entity for all these years and continuously lie to the ASX in the process (which is of course, illegal)?

Or is it maybe possible that Jetstar does in fact turn a profit.
ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2020, 02:24
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Sydney
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE
thats a fair point!

I guess what I was getting at was that there are some ideas that have been discussed so many times that guys convince themselves that they are facts.

My counter point would be why would qantas prop up a loss making entity for all these years and continuously lie to the ASX in the process (which is of course, illegal)?

Or is it maybe possible that Jetstar does in fact turn a profit.
Even if JQ isn't profitable (which I think is unlikely, for the reasons you say), it very plainly serves an important strat fix role for the Qantas Group. It allows the Group to capture a large proportion of the leisure and VFR traffic at a lower cost, while focusing QF itself on targeting corporate and premium leisure traffic. Without JQ, either:
  • VA would be free to make larger profits from the segments that JQ covers, giving it a much stronger base to compete with QF as a hybrid carrier, or
  • QF would have had to heavily restructure itself to become a hybrid carrier, covering low cost and premium traffic.
​​​​​
SecretAngel is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2020, 03:40
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 78
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by SecretAngel
QF would have had to heavily restructure itself to become a hybrid carrier, covering low cost and premium traffic.​​​​​
It's going to have to go through a MAJOR restructure anyway
Chris2303 is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2020, 21:39
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 55
Received 33 Likes on 13 Posts
Qantas could cover the JQ model overnight, using QLink and the 737. The Dash8’s are more comfortable and cheaper to run than the A320 for domestic sectors. The back 10 rows on every 737 become LCC with pay for everything service.

The Virgin story is the biggie though. I love the line that QF should get an incrementally large package if VA does. S Curran was on the TV a few weeks back saying VA were cashed up and would ride out the storm in a healthy state. I remember being stunned as that is at odds with what I’ve heard for a long time.
Window heat is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2020, 21:41
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 314
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Window heat
The Dash8’s are more comfortable and cheaper to run than the A320 for domestic sectors.
Cheaper yes. How are Dash8's more comfortable than an A320?
Slezy9 is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2020, 21:56
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Canberra
Posts: 244
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
For me, a Dash-8, even for Canberra-Sydney is starting to get a bit tedious. Longer sectors: no thanks - unless I can trade off comfort against a substantially reduced ticket price.
layman is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2020, 22:05
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 283
Received 127 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by Window
The Dash8’s are more comfortable and cheaper to run than the A320 for domestic sectors.
Hahaa. What?
das Uber Soldat is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2020, 22:19
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Window heat
Qantas could cover the JQ model overnight, using QLink and the 737. The Dash8’s are more comfortable and cheaper to run than the A320 for domestic sectors.
What??

So you want to put Dash 8s on MEL-OOL sectors and further? And it’ll be cheaper and more comfortable?!

Have a look at the JQ network, I’d say at least half of our flying is over 2 hours. And a lot of the routes have 5-6 A321 flights a day (pre Coronavirus). How many dash 8s/ back 10 rows of a 737 are you planning on using
ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2020, 22:29
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 283
Received 127 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by Chad Gates
Off topic I know, but is JQ completely grounded? There have been no aircraft in the air all morming.
There is a small operation In April based out of Melbourne with a skeleton crew.
das Uber Soldat is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.