Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Filthy cleaning practices

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Mar 2020, 04:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kichin
Posts: 1,050
Received 694 Likes on 190 Posts
Filthy cleaning practices

https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/amp....a4946b29733fda

https://www.2gb.com/horrified-frustr...f-coronavirus/

With aircraft being a proven vector for this virus and our nations flag carrier a beacon of the safety first policy, it’s a wonder they even entertain the thought of appealing the decision from SafeWork NSW.
gordonfvckingramsay is online now  
Old 6th Mar 2020, 05:31
  #2 (permalink)  
ZFT
N4790P
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 73
Posts: 2,271
Received 25 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by gordonfvckingramsay
https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/amp....a4946b29733fda

https://www.2gb.com/horrified-frustr...f-coronavirus/

With aircraft being a proven vector for this virus and our nations flag carrier a beacon of the safety first policy, it’s a wonder they even entertain the thought of appealing the decision from SafeWork NSW.
Can you advise the source of this proof?
ZFT is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2020, 07:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: You live where
Posts: 700
Received 64 Likes on 38 Posts
From SMH

Qantas has been ordered to improve how it cleans its aircraft after a workplace safety inspection found the airline could be putting workers and passengers at risk of catching coronavirus.

SafeWork NSW issued the airline with an improvement notice on February 26, after an inspector found that workers or passengers could be put at risk due its "inadequate system of work used to clean planes that may have transported passengers with an infectious disease".

A Qantas spokesman said the airline was investigating SafeWork NSW's claims and was "considering appealing the notice".

"Our aircraft are thoroughly cleaned after each international flight," he said.

The safety breach notice, seen by The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, says that the inspector witnessed cleaners wiping over multiple plane tray tables with the same cloth without using disinfectant, and cleaning "unknown liquids" on floors and surfaces.

The inspector witnessed cleaners on the aircraft handling wet and used tissues, used face masks and soiled nappies, and workers told the safety watchdog they occasionally had to clean up vomit and blood.

SafeWork NSW has ordered the airline to consult with a health specialist to develop a system specifically to deal with COVID-19.

"[Personal protective equipment] was not mandated for the majority of these tasks", the notice says.

There have been multiple confirmed cases of people carrying COVID-19 on flights to and within Australia, including on a Qantas jet.

SafeWork NSW ordered Qantas to develop and maintain a "safe system of work" for cleaning aircraft to minimise the risk of workers and other people catching infectious diseases, including COVID-19, by March 30.

It also ordered the airline to consult with a health specialist to develop a system specifically to deal with COVID-19, and recommended that it minimise cleaners’ exposure to tissues, face masks and nappies by having passengers dispose of their own waste.

Qantas' spokesman said the airline "is not known for being complacent when it comes to safety or the cleanliness of our aircraft."

"All of our Fleet Presentation teams are provided with personal protective equipment for cleaning the aircraft and for more hazardous items, we have additional equipment such as masks and safety suits," he said.

Transport Workers Union branch secretary Richard Olsen said the SafeWork notice validated concerns raised by a Qantas aircraft cleaner and elected health and safety representative who was suspended from work last month.

“Instead of suspending workers and trying to silence them, Qantas needs to start consulting with workers and help reduce the risk of exposure,” he said.

Last edited by missy; 6th Mar 2020 at 07:11. Reason: .
missy is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2020, 08:27
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it’s a wonder they even entertain the thought of appealing the decision from SafeWork NSW.


They have to. Ego of a few. They need to publish a response that proves them right. Damage control 101. QF are good at it!
PPRuNeUser0198 is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2020, 08:29
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ZFT
Can you advise the source of this proof?
They’ve probably been sacked by now Angel!!!
The Bullwinkle is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2020, 13:37
  #6 (permalink)  
ZFT
N4790P
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 73
Posts: 2,271
Received 25 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by The Bullwinkle
They’ve probably been sacked by now Angel!!!
The statement was along the lines of "aircraft being a proven vector for this virus" and this was what I was asking source of proof for.

And why the Angel rubbish?
​​​​

​​
ZFT is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2020, 19:50
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
The virus survives on surfaces for about 9 days according to researchers.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2020, 20:19
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And why the Angel rubbish?
Poor attempt at humour?!?
The Bullwinkle is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2020, 01:07
  #9 (permalink)  
ZFT
N4790P
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 73
Posts: 2,271
Received 25 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Sunfish
The virus survives on surfaces for about 9 days according to researchers.
My understanding is this is not a given as so dependent upon temperature, humidity and the surface material.

In theory I am a high risk case but I'm not changing my lifestyle other than doing what we did before for SARS etc as there is no way to avoid touching anything!!

Last edited by ZFT; 7th Mar 2020 at 07:26.
ZFT is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2020, 01:49
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 340
Received 53 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Sunfish
The virus survives on surfaces for about 9 days according to researchers.
interesting, I just read something from a medical expert this morning that said the virus is quite fragile and will die fairly quickly on any surface.
AerialPerspective is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2020, 02:10
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is the way I travel. It is very effective. Contaminated surface or not...



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...ht-Europe.html
PPRuNeUser0198 is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2020, 02:17
  #12 (permalink)  
ZFT
N4790P
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 73
Posts: 2,271
Received 25 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by T-Vasis
This is the way I travel. It is very effective. Contaminated surface or not...



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...ht-Europe.html
Why not ask CC to turn temp up?
ZFT is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2020, 02:32
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 89
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-de...-coronaviruses

It is not certain how long the virus that causes COVID-19 survives on surfaces, but it seems to behave like other coronaviruses. Studies suggest that coronaviruses (including preliminary information on the COVID-19 virus) may persist on surfaces for a few hours or up to several days. This may vary under different conditions (e.g. type of surface, temperature or humidity of the environment).
Buswinker is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2020, 22:07
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
I had a briefing on Covid - 19 from the experts on Friday.

1. There are 10X more cases than reported, consequently the lethality is currently overstated.

2. There is no conspiracy/bio weapon/plot, the Chinese researchers have been open and honest.

3. Best protection is frequent hand washing and don’t touch your face, no shaking hands, etc.

Sunfish is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2020, 22:17
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,290
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
I had a briefing on Covid - 19 from the experts on Friday.
Who are these experts? Are they reporting this in the general media, or just privately?
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2020, 22:57
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
Intimately involved researchers.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2020, 00:52
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sunfish
1. There are 10X more cases than reported, consequently the lethality is currently overstated.
That's not necessarily good news - it makes it much harder to contain the spread.
andrewr is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2020, 03:05
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: QLD - where drivers are yet to realise that the left lane goes to their destination too.
Posts: 3,337
Received 182 Likes on 75 Posts
Replying to this
Who are these experts? Are they reporting this in the general media, or just privately?
with this
Intimately involved researchers.
does not make your statement re the no. of deaths any more credible.
50% of random internet pundits will give you confirmation of each of your statements.

Last edited by Traffic_Is_Er_Was; 8th Mar 2020 at 03:15.
Traffic_Is_Er_Was is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2020, 05:25
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: aus
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
Received 107 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
Who are these experts? Are they reporting this in the general media, or just privately?
Probably either his imagination or a not a real expert, they dont use "lethality" its mortality and morbidity

Mortality is calculated as (dead /cured) * 100

Patients with the virus / disease that are not resolved to either dead or cured are not counted for mortality because they could still either live or die
rattman is online now  
Old 8th Mar 2020, 05:33
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
Apparently, the detailed maths of the outbreak indicate that it was circulating in China in November and possibly as early as October, not as currently suggested by Chinese researchers December 1 for the index case.

In addition, the discovery that infected people, including children, can be almost asymptomatic is a factor. A case in point is Dr. Chris Higgins in Melbourne today.

Then there is the discovery that the current COvid-19 tests produce a high percentage of false negatives even with repeated testing.

This led researchers to believe there are 10X more cases than reported. This indicates that the CFR is much lower than the 3% being suggested. Epidemiologists have also made the observation that overestimates of CFR are common in the early stages of a pandemic so this is not a surprise to them.
Sunfish is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.