Climate Change and YSSY crosswinds?
One little problem with that theory of yours, its just a theory.
Produce the definitive study that proves man made Global warming or Climate Change {as it is called these days} beyond a reasonable doubt.....oh look at that...no proof...Hmmmmm!!!
10 years ago all those LEFT WING scientists were caught fudging the figures of MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING which was completely debunked, hence CLIMATE CHANGE these days yet not a shred of evidence besides that fantastic well respected Qantas theory which must prove it of course!!
Nobody denies the worlds climate changes over the centuries with various temperature fluctuations and has cycles but going all GRETA THUNBERG on us and claiming its MAN MADE is a touch much dont you think!!
Thats what this whole argument is about, LEFTIES claiming climate change is all man made....get a grip!!!
Produce the definitive study that proves man made Global warming or Climate Change {as it is called these days} beyond a reasonable doubt.....oh look at that...no proof...Hmmmmm!!!
10 years ago all those LEFT WING scientists were caught fudging the figures of MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING which was completely debunked, hence CLIMATE CHANGE these days yet not a shred of evidence besides that fantastic well respected Qantas theory which must prove it of course!!
Nobody denies the worlds climate changes over the centuries with various temperature fluctuations and has cycles but going all GRETA THUNBERG on us and claiming its MAN MADE is a touch much dont you think!!
Thats what this whole argument is about, LEFTIES claiming climate change is all man made....get a grip!!!
“MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING which was completely debunked”
“claiming its MAN MADE is a touch much dont you think”
Here’s some studies and info for you to read:
The 97% consensus on global warming
The Causes of Climate Change
Scientific Consensus: Earth's Climate is Warming
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The per capita statisitic is such a furphy as the reality is Australia generates very little of the worlds total CO2, which after all is the problem,
How can the world persuade China (which contributes 25% of emissions) to improve their game, when they can just point at Australia and say that we are worse than they are?
The whistle was blown on anthropogenic climate change in the late 1960's and definitely in the 1970's. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histor...change_science
In terms of implementing a solution, the per capita statistic is valid, because the solution needs to come from government. Therefore it must be political. There will be a short-term cost, that will ultimately be borne by citizens. How can the world persuade China (which contributes 25% of emissions) to improve their game, when they can just point at Australia and say that we are worse than they are?
Dates are all to do with what you think you can get away with .............. 1C, 2C, 3C.......
The planet is warming naturally, the rate of warming has increased due to industrialisation since 1700 and TBH there isn't much we can do about it medium term. The sea levels WILL rise, deserts will spread and the ice cap will shrink. But then again much of Canada and Russia will be available for crops and settlement.
It means vast movements of population - and don't think they can be stopped
I don't think buying an electric car will make any difference whatsoever
The planet is warming naturally, the rate of warming has increased due to industrialisation since 1700 and TBH there isn't much we can do about it medium term. The sea levels WILL rise, deserts will spread and the ice cap will shrink. But then again much of Canada and Russia will be available for crops and settlement.
It means vast movements of population - and don't think they can be stopped
I don't think buying an electric car will make any difference whatsoever
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida and wherever my laptop is
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Christ almighty! Would be cheaper to build every airport world wide as all over fields than to try and change what's been going on since the the planet was formed!
I bet the other Airlines CEO's (better known as Cash Extraction Officers) are kicking themselves they didn't get in on the Climate Change fairy tale!
I bet the other Airlines CEO's (better known as Cash Extraction Officers) are kicking themselves they didn't get in on the Climate Change fairy tale!
Struck me that Australia will look like the Gulf today, New Zealand will look like Australia now and the UK (whats still above water) will be like Spain
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"and the UK (whats still above water) will be like Spain." Lovely, Scotland with a Mediterranean climate, great thing, cannae wait. And funny thing here, we have climate change twice a year. Just now we are going in to a cold period. If the climate changes more than that I will start to worry.
Can't help feeling there is too much propaganda in all this climate debate.
Can't help feeling there is too much propaganda in all this climate debate.
No - it's happening Rocchi - check out the science. Scotland was covered in several hundred meters of ice a couple of million years back https://www.bgs.ac.uk/discoveringGeo...eAge/home.html - its warmed up a little since then.
The media coverage is all generated about who to blame, who can profit and who gets shafted
The media coverage is all generated about who to blame, who can profit and who gets shafted
But I’ll post a few links to some scientists who can debunk some of the nonsense written by some posters here. For instance here are 200 international scientific bodies (including the Australian Academy of Science, BoM, CSIRO and Australian Meterological and Oceanographic Society) who have concluded the global climate is changing and is human induced:
The following are scientific organizations that hold the position that Climate Change has been caused by human action
Empirical evidence that humans are causing global warming
They think they’re experts because the media they consume tells them that all the climate scientists are liars and it’s all a big conspiracy.
It doesn’t matter how many factual peer reviewed studies you present at the end of the day it’s just a big con that all scientists have bought into and all the data is fake anyway.
They think they’re experts because the media they consume tells them that all the climate scientists are liars and it’s all a big conspiracy.
I’m not a qualified climate scientist....
BTW the ABC had an article on their website about the BoM discovery of SSW over Antarctica. The BoM were very careful to state that it wasn't linked to climate change. You might find that the science might start toning down the rhetoric in the coming years.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: At home.
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flight sim
I flew a 747 in MS Flight sim, was a piece of piss so I can therefore fly anything. Anyone got any questions on Commercial aviation just ask me. I may not be trained, qualified or any form of aviation expert but I have an opinion and will argue the toss with any commercial, military or private pilot.
Signed,
Clime Ate Scientist
Signed,
Clime Ate Scientist
Neither is Ross Garnaut, he's an economist yet he is considered an expert, neither is Tim Flannary, he is a paleontologist yet he is considered an expert, neither Sir David (he's the new Messiah) Attenborough, he is a television presenter yet he is considered an expert.
and the best one of all Y2K "roone they cried!" including all the worlds "experts" and especially the UN.
BTW the ABC had an article on their website about the BoM discovery of SSW over Antarctica. The BoM were very careful to state that it wasn't linked to climate change. You might find that the science might start toning down the rhetoric in the coming years.
The only debate that exists is if negative effects of the change can be stopped. Some scientists think it’s inevitable and unchangeable now. But there are zero credible scientists who will back up the views espoused by the very loud climate denial lobby.
I flew a 747 in MS Flight sim, was a piece of piss so I can therefore fly anything. Anyone got any questions on Commercial aviation just ask me. I may not be trained, qualified or any form of aviation expert but I have an opinion and will argue the toss with any commercial, military or private pilot.
Signed,
Clime Ate Scientist
Signed,
Clime Ate Scientist
11,000 "scientists" signing something in support is as relevant as 11,000 catholics supporting the infallibility of the pope. Both meaningless. See here for the list of signatories. https://oup.silverchair-cdn.com/oup/...5G5CRDK6RD3PGA
Skeptical Science Study Finds 97% Consensus on Human-Caused Global Warming in the Peer-Reviewed Literature
Last edited by dr dre; 26th Nov 2019 at 01:37.
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I’m more referring to the over 12,000 peer review studies that confirm the fact that climate change is caused by humans:
Skeptical Science Study Finds 97% Consensus on Human-Caused Global Warming in the Peer-Reviewed Literature
He was interested in deflecting away attention from a cancellation rate that is beginning to impact his self enrichment "bonus" enshrined in OTP.