Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Flying into MEL? Beware......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Nov 2019, 20:17
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Dog House
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Berealgetreal
I’ve observed the majority don’t read them and no longer have any idea of the latest manual changes as they update hit update on the iPad. Electronically bombarded with huge amounts of information much of it completely irrelevant to the role.

Pilots not only lost control of their conditions but also the way their job is done. Magenta generation, ARBEY time, COBT and ordering vacuuum cleaner batteries for cabin crew whilst doing take off figures. Ludicrous, zero leadership.

The work creation schemes continue.
So true! And for those that do carefully scroll through the garbage to find the relevant with the resultant pressure it puts on an on-time departure - you can see how it all unfolds that most just don't bother and it becomes the new lowered norm. Our NOTAM service is like reading through the terms of End User Licence Agreement! Riveting!!
The Butcher's Dog is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2019, 21:24
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Dirty South
Posts: 449
Received 21 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Berealgetreal
I’ve observed the majority don’t read them and no longer have any idea of the latest manual changes as they update hit update on the iPad. Electronically bombarded with huge amounts of information much of it completely irrelevant to the role.

Pilots not only lost control of their conditions but also the way their job is done. Magenta generation, ARBEY time, COBT and ordering vacuuum cleaner batteries for cabin crew whilst doing take off figures. Ludicrous, zero leadership.

The work creation schemes continue.

On the subject of iPads as EFB - do you have NOTAMs displayed in Jeppesen Flight Deck Pro ? The app organizes them by the applicable chart and decodes them into plain English. It doesn’t completely solve the problem. But it makes it more manageable.



JPJP is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2019, 21:45
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Nz
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
I agree it’s a safety issue. I make a point of reading all the info that the regs require me to read. I do it quickly and as efficiently as I can. I then walk as expeditiously as I can through security and to the gate, this takes between 15 and twenty minutes. By now I am about ten minutes behind the companies timing schedule.
At the gate a young employee of a third party contractor checks my ID to make sure I’m not an imposter and then I can make my way down the aerobridge. When I do this I meet a direct employee of the Airline who often theatrically looks at their watch or comments on their desire for an on time departure. In one ( unusual) case she actually put her hand on my back and pushed me towards the aircraft in an attempt to speed up my walking pace. They normally have a clipboard and note down the time I board the aircraft where I meet my crew for the first time.
Having been thoroughly trained in the importance of teamwork and leadership I call the crew together to brief the day ahead. This is a major cause of frustration for the gate staff as there is an expectation that boarding will commence as soon as I step foot on the aircraft. Briefing is kept brief, perhaps one minute to ensure everyone is fit ( as per the regs).
Most of the time my crew are happy to come together and the tone is set to relax and go about our jobs at a sensible pace, sometimes, the pressure ( from emails and ground staff) has been too much for them and they are already rushing before the first sector.
Most of the time I get away on time, sometimes I’m a few minutes late.
Conflicting Standard Operating Procedures has been a known hazard for thirty years yet they are alive and well with no attempt to rectify as long as the KPI is OTP.
73qanda is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2019, 21:47
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Harbour Master Place
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Right on the money Berealgetreal.
The issue of excessive NOTAMs was a contributing factor in the KSFO Taxiway OverflightAir Canada Flight 759 incident (NTSB report), a hair's breath away from being the greatest accident in aviation history.
CurtainTwitcher is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2019, 21:49
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by wishiwasupthere
Wasn’t one of the outcomes of the Air Canada near landing on a taxiway at SFO too many unnecessary NOTAMs?


It was indeed a finding of the NTSB investigation. NTSB Chairman Sumwalt is a retired USAir captain.

NTSB chairman Robert Sumwalt called the Notam system in the U.S. “messed up” this week during a hearing on the July 7, 2017 incident at San Francisco International Airport (SFO) in which an Air Canada Airbus A320 nearly landed on a crowded taxiway. The crew mistook the taxiway as their cleared runway—28R—because Runway 28L was closed. The pilots failed to catch that note on page eight of the 27-page list of the SFO Notams.

After acknowledging the “crew didn’t comprehend the Notams,” Sumwalt then read a verbose and complicated entry that limited a portion of a taxiway to aircraft with a wingspan of 214 feet or less. “Why is this even on there?” he asked. “That's what Notams are: they’re a bunch of garbage that no one pays any attention to,” adding that they’re often written in a language that only computer programmers would understand.

Sumwalt also relayed a recent experience he had flying the jumpseat into North Carolina’s Charlotte/Douglas International Airport, saying, “There were pages and pages and pages of Notams, including one for birds in the vicinity of the airport…when are there not birds in the vicinity of an airport?”


https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/business-aviation/2018-09-28/ntsb-chairman-calls-notams-garbage
Airbubba is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2019, 02:20
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,556
Received 75 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by Buster Hyman
So, if the airlines had to increase sign on times in order to allow for these 'extensive' NOTAMS, would there be some motivation for the aforementioned airlines to be proactive in this instance?
(Or, is this just as silly as suggesting they cut them down?)
Cutting them down isn't silly, Buster. Have a look at the huge swaths of land around airports that are bulldozed, with thousands of trees flattened, for big warehouses. Nobody blinks an eye at that...
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2019, 06:58
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: australia
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they were actually concerned about safety, maybe they’d cut the f@#kers down (or at least prune them) instead of issuing bullish!t NOTAMs!

As opposed to PPruning them - like we are here
benjam is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 04:23
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,991
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by hoss
That’s why I get the FO to plot them all before flight😉.

Typical Australian bul!5h/t as usual🤬, very embarrassing.

what? You think Australia is the only Country issuing stupid Notams like that!!!
ACMS is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2019, 10:52
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Equatorial
Age: 51
Posts: 1,068
Received 125 Likes on 62 Posts
Originally Posted by benjam
As opposed to PPruning them - like we are here
Give that man a beer!!!
Global Aviator is online now  
Old 8th Nov 2019, 06:32
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Right hand seat of a 777
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see the trees have finally grown back after emirates did the council out of a job in 2009!
OMAAbound is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2019, 14:33
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Broughton, UK
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
I would like to know how they got the height of the twigs and leaves to 2 decimal places, when the don't know how far away they are.
I suppose they surveyed them all on a calm wind day...?
scifi is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.