Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

VN forgot to drop

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Sep 2019, 05:18
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Equatorial
Age: 51
Posts: 1,068
Received 124 Likes on 61 Posts
Well the system worked and caught a fook up. They somehow no doubt managed to do the before landing checklist without confirming all items. We have all seen variations of this no doubt. I heard of someone in a 320 do the same thing...

What was it that was said on completion of the constant speed retrac endorsement... I recall my instructor saying there are those who have and those that.....
Global Aviator is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2019, 08:08
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NZ
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BuzzBox
A ‘CONFIG GEAR’ EICAS warning is generated if the landing gear is not down and locked and one of the following occurs:
  • Below 800 feet radio altitude and a thrust lever is at idle, or
  • The flaps are in a landing position
A GPWS Mode 4A warning ‘TOO LOW GEAR’ is triggered at 500 ft RA.
Thanks for that info. Does the system on the 787 not use envelope modulation for mode 4? My understanding is that this is standard on all new Honeywell EGPWS, so you should get ‘TOO LOW, GEAR’ at 500 ft above the runway, rather than 500 ft RA.

Cloud Cutter is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2019, 09:22
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,991
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Global Aviator
Well the system worked and caught a fook up. They somehow no doubt managed to do the before landing checklist without confirming all items. We have all seen variations of this no doubt. I heard of someone in a 320 do the same thing

I’d say that they didn’t do the Landing checklist at all.....
”✔️ LANDING GEAR.......DOWN“ is a sensed item isn’t it? It wouldn’t have been green ticked and they wouldn’t get CHECKLIST COMPLETE. So unless the ECL was inoperative then they simply didn’t do the Landing checklist at that point.

Last edited by ACMS; 23rd Sep 2019 at 09:34.
ACMS is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2019, 19:27
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'Checklists are only for the inexperienced pilots'. Heard on the flight deck of one rather large Asian carrier from a Check Capt. They then proceeded to commence taxi with the NWS off (Airbus OEB had it switched off for pushback at the time).
Outtahere is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2019, 23:57
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Moved beyond
Posts: 1,174
Received 88 Likes on 50 Posts
Originally Posted by Cloud Cutter


Thanks for that info. Does the system on the 787 not use envelope modulation for mode 4? My understanding is that this is standard on all new Honeywell EGPWS, so you should get ‘TOO LOW, GEAR’ at 500 ft above the runway, rather than 500 ft RA.


I'm not sure - Honeywell says that envelope modulation is used at certain locations to either expand the Mode 4 envelope for improved alerting, or to desensitise it to prevent nuisance alerts. However, the only Boeing reference I can find says that envelope modulation lowers the radio altitude limits to prevent nuisance alerts.

Last edited by BuzzBox; 24th Sep 2019 at 01:52.
BuzzBox is online now  
Old 24th Sep 2019, 11:35
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: down under
Posts: 463
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
I've made mistakes with pre-landing checklists (ie, forgot). Only those who've never made a mistake while flying should criticize.
cooperplace is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2019, 12:34
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NZ
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BuzzBox
I'm not sure - Honeywell says that envelope modulation is used at certain locations to either expand the Mode 4 envelope for improved alerting, or to desensitise it to prevent nuisance alerts. However, the only Boeing reference I can find says that envelope modulation lowers the radio altitude limits to prevent nuisance alerts.
Classic Boeing, dumbing down the manual to what we ‘need to know’

Cloud Cutter is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.