Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Mt Cook and Air Nelson contract

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Mt Cook and Air Nelson contract

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Sep 2019, 17:44
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: NZ
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dctPub
Ha! Classic f**k you I've got mine mentality. Yea just go ahead and join a multitude of other regional carriers flying around New Zealand.

This classic stitch up has been seen many times around the world and the geniuses down under discovered they can kill the unborn for their own gain.
Not sure how its a classic "f**k you ive got mine" mentality when a new recruit gets exactly the same conditions and pay that I get (assuming they have their atpl subjects completed and start on same pay level).
Thewnz is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2019, 19:02
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Nz
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Thewnz
For a Q driver that is directly affected, I am all in really for this contract. Yes i wish the pay divide was addressed as im still earn $12k less than an FO at the same level flying the ATR and skippers are still earning a lot less. The blended scale that will be adopted has its issues but it is what it is, new emoyees dont have to sign it if they dont want the job.
I'm sorry but the same could also be said when you were given the Air Nelson contract, no one forced you to sign along the dotted line.
I just hope you realize that you are punishing yourselves just as much as the new hires with the blended/ B scale pay when you get directed into an ATR (maybe even with a forced base move) flying the exact same aircraft, routes and TODs as current Cook pilots but for significantly less money until the company has gotten rid of 16-18 Qs. Food for thought
Fush n Chups is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2019, 19:46
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: .
Posts: 102
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pisstin broke
Rest assured that ALPA will always act in the interests of one particular pilot group, and it ain't either of the Links
Isn’t ALPA trying to look after the Links by Career pathways, joining of the seniority lists, Links getting directly into the Jets without interviews etc?

Sometimes it’s better to take a deep breath and reflect on what is/has been going on rather than shoot from the hip
fly real fast is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2019, 22:47
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Dunnunda
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
seems to me that ALPA has looked after the links a little too much
kev2002 is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2019, 03:34
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ardmore, New Zealand
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fush n Chups
I'm sorry but the same could also be said when you were given the Air Nelson contract, no one forced you to sign along the dotted line.
I just hope you realize that you are punishing yourselves just as much as the new hires with the blended/ B scale pay when you get directed into an ATR (maybe even with a forced base move) flying the exact same aircraft, routes and TODs as current Cook pilots but for significantly less money until the company has gotten rid of 16-18 Qs. Food for thought
I just hope you realise how much you would be punishing yourself if this offer gets voted down. You think the second offer is going to be better? If you think all the power will be in your court going in to future bargaining rounds as a subcontractor then good luck to ya!
KiwiAvi8er is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2019, 04:32
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: In the Jungle
Age: 39
Posts: 285
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Fush n Chups
I'm sorry but the same could also be said when you were given the Air Nelson contract, no one forced you to sign along the dotted line.
I just hope you realize that you are punishing yourselves just as much as the new hires with the blended/ B scale pay when you get directed into an ATR (maybe even with a forced base move) flying the exact same aircraft, routes and TODs as current Cook pilots but for significantly less money until the company has gotten rid of 16-18 Qs. Food for thought
But that's not true though is it. That's not how the blending works at all, which means you're either not affected by it, haven't bothered to go to a meeting or talk to the negotiators or are stirring.
Massey058 is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2019, 04:36
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chill out

I’ve never heard such rubbish, why are you making it sound so doom and gloom if this doesn’t get over the line. All that happens is they go back to the drawing board and divvy the money up more fairly then it goes back out to the vote. Keep in mind Air Nz is still making huge profits. I don’t think you understand negotiations if you think the first offer is the best one, look at our engineers as an example.
go123 is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2019, 05:20
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ardmore, New Zealand
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by go123
I’ve never heard such rubbish, why are you making it sound so doom and gloom if this doesn’t get over the line. All that happens is they go back to the drawing board and divvy the money up more fairly then it goes back out to the vote. Keep in mind Air Nz is still making huge profits. I don’t think you understand negotiations if you think the first offer is the best one, look at our engineers as an example.
We’ll see shortly won’t we. They’ve already stated that if this doesn’t go through we go to individual bargaining. This unfortunately isn’t a normal situation where you can dig in for more money. Both airlines won’t exist from early next year.
KiwiAvi8er is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2019, 05:40
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yup, we sure will. Individual bargaining is further down the track, don’t fret Aviator
go123 is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2019, 11:44
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: scandi
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grrr

Originally Posted by fly real fast


Isn’t ALPA trying to look after the Links by Career pathways, joining of the seniority lists, Links getting directly into the Jets without interviews etc?

Sometimes it’s better to take a deep breath and reflect on what is/has been going on rather than shoot from the hip
Why is there a scope clause in the ANZ Alpa pilot's contract? Who was it specifically designed to exclude from operating jets.
Link pilots - know your place.
pisstin broke is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2019, 19:46
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ardmore, New Zealand
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pisstin broke
Why is there a scope clause in the ANZ Alpa pilot's contract? Who was it specifically designed to exclude from operating jets.
Link pilots - know your place.
Not sure what your point is. Superiority complex anyone?
KiwiAvi8er is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2019, 19:59
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: scandi
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KiwiAvi8er


Not sure what your point is. Superiority complex anyone?
Irony is kinda lost on you Kiwi
pisstin broke is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2019, 20:15
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ardmore, New Zealand
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pisstin broke
Irony is kinda lost on you Kiwi
Ok. Forgive me, but, that kind of comment seems to be a commonly held view at the jet fleet. And those guys aren’t trying to be ironic.
KiwiAvi8er is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2019, 20:58
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: In the Jungle
Age: 39
Posts: 285
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Can't really blame them for having a scope clause given the history of Freedom, BAe146 at Mount Cook and Zeal320. Makes a lot of sense. Just hope everyone can see the bigger picture and the long term.
Massey058 is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2019, 23:03
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: At Home
Posts: 397
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Just look over the ditch to our neighbors at QF... Cobham, Network, Express Freighters, Jetstar, JetConnect, did I miss anyone??

For link Pilots to moan about that scope clause is incredibly short sighted... or perhaps incredibly selfish coming from those whose career progression stopped in the regionals?

Do we really want to be a “Group Airline” climbing all over each in a bid race to the bottom for new types/routes?

Tag&Release and the GOP list is ALPA (and the company) looking out for regional pilots at the expense of every other Pilot joining Air NZ. If it goes ahead, a 19 year old Cadet will forever have seniority on (for example) the ex Cathay Captain joining us. Sure the Cathay Pilot might start on the A320, but they’ll have 600 regional Pilots & 400 Jet Pilots ahead of them for promotion. They’ll be an F20 until retirement so why would they join?
ElZilcho is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2019, 23:44
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The GOP is dead

The GOP is dead, it will never get ratified. Let’s just leave it at that. The current set up is the best we are going to get. Guess what happens when Air NZ jet starts hiring in 2 years? The links won’t release any pilots because of manpower and externals will be hired, the new 80/20 ratio will take care of your number. If we have to reinterview for the role then so be it. If you want to fly a jet so badly then don’t stay at the links, man up and leave and you’ll end up starting at Air NZ before all of us if that’s what you want.
go123 is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2019, 03:37
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ardmore, New Zealand
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ElZilcho
Just look over the ditch to our neighbors at QF... Cobham, Network, Express Freighters, Jetstar, JetConnect, did I miss anyone??

For link Pilots to moan about that scope clause is incredibly short sighted... or perhaps incredibly selfish coming from those whose career progression stopped in the regionals?

Do we really want to be a “Group Airline” climbing all over each in a bid race to the bottom for new types/routes?

Tag&Release and the GOP list is ALPA (and the company) looking out for regional pilots at the expense of every other Pilot joining Air NZ. If it goes ahead, a 19 year old Cadet will forever have seniority on (for example) the ex Cathay Captain joining us. Sure the Cathay Pilot might start on the A320, but they’ll have 600 regional Pilots & 400 Jet Pilots ahead of them for promotion. They’ll be an F20 until retirement so why would they join?
No one is “moaning” about a scope clause. This thread is about the regional collective offer, nothing to do with GOP lists or scope clauses.

Do do we want to be a Group Airline? Well the company’s already decided that’s happening. Which is why Cook and Nelson support staff are currently being made redundant.

KiwiAvi8er is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2019, 09:35
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Enzud
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KiwiAvi8er


Ok. Forgive me, but, that kind of comment seems to be a commonly held view at the jet fleet. And those guys aren’t trying to be ironic.
We have a superiority complex? I think we are just keen on protecting the high standards to which we operate and not hand out jobs to people that have failed previously or were too lazy to put in the effort and front up for an interview in the first place. But lucky for you their ‘loyalty’ is now being rewarded.

The clause is to tighten up our contract so that no said, ‘loyal’ pilots can try and jump positions, it’s only for our piece of mind, as discussed before, the discussion in link flightdecks in the early stages of pathways about PG’s and original DOJ spooked us. (They only have themselves to blame).

Unfortunately some of these people who were wanting to hold out till their “Bus command came up” (apparently the FO role was beneath them), are now having a bit of trouble getting through the training and it looks like we might be heading back to more in-depth screening which we had previously. (I wish no ill will on any one btw) but If you’re looking for superiority complexes, you are looking in the wrong place...

captsf is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2019, 17:05
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Nz
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ElZilcho
Just look over the ditch to our neighbors at QF... Cobham, Network, Express Freighters, Jetstar, JetConnect, did I miss anyone??

For link Pilots to moan about that scope clause is incredibly short sighted... or perhaps incredibly selfish coming from those whose career progression stopped in the regionals?

Do we really want to be a “Group Airline” climbing all over each in a bid race to the bottom for new types/routes?

Tag&Release and the GOP list is ALPA (and the company) looking out for regional pilots at the expense of every other Pilot joining Air NZ. If it goes ahead, a 19 year old Cadet will forever have seniority on (for example) the ex Cathay Captain joining us. Sure the Cathay Pilot might start on the A320, but they’ll have 600 regional Pilots & 400 Jet Pilots ahead of them for promotion. They’ll be an F20 until retirement so why would they join?
I don't think anyone in the links looking to jump over anyone in the jet fleet with group seniority nor would it ever get approved. I think that would be an extremely s*** thing for anyone to even consider. If that is the case it's a very select minority.
On the flip side I don't really feel any sympathy for current jet pilots that left NZ to chase the big money overseas that was a decision they made knowing full well that the door back home might shut. While guys who have been working within the links for 5+ years are being severely disadvantaged and big brother is actively excluding people contributing to the companies success and rewarding deserters. Well yes it is a smart business move (only in the short term) but it's extremely disheartening for current employees and leading to continual high turn over rates which is creating a bottleneck where pilots can't be released because of shortages and actually causing the company to sink big money into continuously training pilots to refill roles.

We all know the GOP will never happen and these recent link fossil's that walked in without an interview have ruined it for everyone else behind them by underperforming and failing or needing extra training. The interview should have been left in place that way only people who seriously wanted to join the jets would have applied and not created such a massive back long, now current link pilots are staring down the barrel of 10+ years in regional before transferring across.
Fush n Chups is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2019, 19:34
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: .
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by captsf
the discussion in link flightdecks in the early stages of pathways about PG’s and original DOJ spooked us. (They only have themselves to blame).
Rest assured that was a select group of muppets and definitely not the general view from the 'link flightdecks'
mark247 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.