Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Project Sunrise

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Oct 2019, 07:56
  #341 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NDB
Age: 53
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by NGsim
If ANY pilot voted yes on a mythical contract with an imaginary airplane flying unknown routes with a barely agreed crew compliment in a yet to even be decided schedule, then said pilot has no place in the modern threat and error environment if they can’t manage said threats before they’ve even got to the car park for one of these proposed duties.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ What he/she said. 100% agree
OnceBitten is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2019, 08:26
  #342 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sincity
Posts: 1,195
Received 33 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Capt Colonial
Well, there’s the crunch Galdian. It varies significantly dependent on individuals and factors such as age, previous flight status (cumulative fatigue) and health!

Two local nights (over a 48hour period) usually give two-nights (probable) rest and recovery, theoretically.

However, with New York City, one is well and truly out of one’s Time Zone so if you don’t get to sleep, one is totally “mashed” to operate! And that’s two-crew currently, in congested airspace!

Rest wise, it can be the same with crews in SCL, LON and the same in JNB.

Generally, 48 hours (two full local nights) and its time to go. As a lot of the SCL crews find extended time in-country doesn’t really help, in fact, it makes it harder to get a sound sleep.

Some of the Pilots stay on SYD time which they say works for them though a tad-anti social and dis-connected.

KLM maintained some years ago that it was better to get out of Dodge and head-home ASAP on LH Flight Patterns.

I personally believe the magic number is around 48 hours (encompassing 2 local nights) however schedules just don’t give that option all the time.

With what Qantas is allegedly proposing in Project Sunrise, as SYD-LON and SYD-JFK, there is to date, only a very uncertain and vague outline without any known data to draw upon regarding rest. The Regulator the Pilot Unions and the Pilots themselves would want to progress very cautiously with whatever is agreed. If it's agreed!
I'd posit 48-60hrs as a good window
Longer the benefit reduces and makes the home turn worse.
maggot is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2019, 08:26
  #343 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,625
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
Originally Posted by NGsim
If ANY pilot voted yes on a mythical contract with an imaginary airplane flying unknown routes with a barely agreed crew compliment in a yet to even be decided schedule, then said pilot has no place in the modern threat and error environment if they can’t manage said threats before they’ve even got to the car park for one of these proposed duties.
Agreed , but you know what that’s what Nathan Safe and Qantas are pushing. A vote in November and board decision early December. Send it to fair work I say for mediation. I’m still perplexed about the clause known as the coles clause.
An enterprise bargaining agreement (EBA) can be registered with Fair Work Australia only if it leaves each worker better off overall. I don’t see how what Qantas is proposing can pass this in any shape or form.
dragon man is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2019, 09:09
  #344 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Going nowhere...
Posts: 343
Received 21 Likes on 3 Posts
Smile



Past experience has shown that you shouldn’t do both ports in the same roster for fatigue reasons.
I’m not sure it’s that simple. The end of one roster is followed immediately by the beginning of the next. Surely no one wants to be tied to only-east or only-west ULH flying.
I suspect what you’re really getting at is a sensible ‘interval’ between any series of east-bound ULH which follows a series of west-bound ULH or vice versa?

Another possibility, which may require lateral thinking wrt 5th freedoms, is “one-way” scheduling around the world. Eg;
- SYD-JFK-LHR-SYD over about ten days, or
- SYD-LHR-JFK-SYD in similar time.
Thus a pattern of ULH-Medium distance (even paxing?)-ULH may be a way of keeping pilots in a predictable, repeatable and consistent routine of ‘future duties preparedness’ from the time they start work in their home port.

Just thinking aloud....
Jetsbest is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2019, 09:55
  #345 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Jetsbest,
Blimey!!!, everything old is new again.
"Back in the day", a typical PanAm roster for some ( you needed to be senior) crew was one round the world trip per month, either east or west ---- no long sectors, but plenty of long ToD, you started off east or west, and kept going.
Typically a two week trip, that accumulated the monthly pay hours in one go, rest of the month off.
Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2019, 11:02
  #346 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: You live where
Posts: 700
Received 64 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by Jetsbest
Another possibility, which may require lateral thinking wrt 5th freedoms, is “one-way” scheduling around the world. Eg;
- SYD-JFK-LHR-SYD over about ten days, or
- SYD-LHR-JFK-SYD in similar time.
Thus a pattern of ULH-Medium distance (even paxing?)-ULH may be a way of keeping pilots in a predictable, repeatable and consistent routine of ‘future duties preparedness’ from the time they start work in their home port.
I was going to suggest the same
missy is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2019, 14:01
  #347 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dragon man


Agreed , but you know what that’s what Nathan Safe and Qantas are pushing. A vote in November and board decision early December. Send it to fair work I say for mediation. I’m still perplexed about the clause known as the coles clause.
An enterprise bargaining agreement (EBA) can be registered with Fair Work Australia only if it leaves each worker better off overall. I don’t see how what Qantas is proposing can pass this in any shape or form.

The Better Off Overall Test (BOOT) is a comparison between an Agreement and the relevant modern Award (Air Pilots Award 2010), not between an Agreement and its predecessor. The 777 Captain hourly rate under the Award is $81.86.
*Lancer* is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2019, 23:12
  #348 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: QLD - where drivers are yet to realise that the left lane goes to their destination too.
Posts: 3,337
Received 182 Likes on 75 Posts
Brisbane based 747 crews for 3 years doing back to back JFK patterns
How long was crew rest in LAX? I thought a different crew took it LAX-JFK.
Traffic_Is_Er_Was is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2019, 00:08
  #349 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,625
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
Originally Posted by Traffic_Is_Er_Was
How long was crew rest in LAX? I thought a different crew took it LAX-JFK.
No they didn’t. The slip was 48,48,24. The 48 in New York was a waste IMO and would have been better in Lax.
dragon man is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2019, 00:18
  #350 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I’ve never been as tired as doing a LHR, then after min base turnaround JFK. The sector from JFK to LAX two pilot was a punish.

Interesting Ted talk linking lack of sleep to cancer.....

http://t.ted.com/BFWOfuD
Brutus is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2019, 02:34
  #351 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,625
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
Originally Posted by Brutus
I’ve never been as tired as doing a LHR, then after min base turnaround JFK. The sector from JFK to LAX two pilot was a punish.

Interesting Ted talk linking lack of sleep to cancer.....

http://t.ted.com/BFWOfuD
That is why IMO you need to do one or the other for a bid period not mix them up.
dragon man is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2019, 02:42
  #352 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Between a Rock and a Hard Place
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All these ideas seem a little too sensible.
Jeps is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2019, 02:50
  #353 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: North
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brutus

Interesting Ted talk linking lack of sleep to cancer.....

http://t.ted.com/BFWOfuD
Matthew Walker is Professor of Neuroscience and Psychology, so he knows what he’s talking about regarding sleep.

There’s a big thread on the airlinepilotforum.com where all the American pilots were talking about Matt Walkers interview with Joe Rogan episode #1109. Very relevant for all long haul pilots and probably also short haulers on high divisors.

They’ve recently discovered years of poor quality sleep has a direct link with chronic diseases such as heart disease, cancer, Alzheimer’s, dementia, obesity. He said this is because the body and brain starts to repair itself both mentally and physically only in the deep sleep (4th stage). The body only gets to this 4th stage of sleep if it achieves 7-9 hours of uninterrupted continuous sleep. Also unfortunately, alcohol prevents the body from getting to 4th stage of sleep.

Personally I’m relieved Project Sunrise is dead in the water just like red Q.




Last edited by Dunda; 14th Oct 2019 at 03:42.
Dunda is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2019, 03:38
  #354 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Harbour Master Place
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Dunda, found the episode on youtube.

CurtainTwitcher is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2019, 04:00
  #355 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Wellington
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jeps
All these ideas seem a little too sensible.
Don't let common sense get in the way of a Campus thought bubble..
Street garbage is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2019, 04:26
  #356 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Dunda, I’ll check it out.
Brutus is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2019, 04:29
  #357 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely Fort Fumble would willingly hand over existing long term sick leave data.

A good sized sample, with lots of repeat observations.
Rated De is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2019, 04:39
  #358 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: QLD - where drivers are yet to realise that the left lane goes to their destination too.
Posts: 3,337
Received 182 Likes on 75 Posts
No they didn’t. The slip was 48,48,24. The 48 in New York was a waste IMO and would have been better in Lax.
So they had 48 hrs off in LAX before doing a JFk leg, then 48hrs off before RTN LAX then 24 hrs off before BNE. Sounds pretty cruzy. 1 on 2 off 1 on 2 off 1 on 1 off 1 on then multiple days off. And a sleep during most work days. A lot of shift workers would love a roster like that.
Traffic_Is_Er_Was is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2019, 05:05
  #359 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They’ve recently discovered years of poor quality sleep has a direct link with chronic diseases such as heart disease, cancer, Alzheimer’s, dementia, obesity.
No they haven’t. This research has been around for many years, and there is a large body of published literature.
PPRuNeUser0198 is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2019, 05:25
  #360 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Traffic_Is_Er_Was
So they had 48 hrs off in LAX before doing a JFk leg, then 48hrs off before RTN LAX then 24 hrs off before BNE. Sounds pretty cruzy. 1 on 2 off 1 on 2 off 1 on 1 off 1 on then multiple days off. And a sleep during most work days. A lot of shift workers would love a roster like that.
What an ignorant comment. When did you last do it?
Troo believer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.