Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Project Sunrise

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Sep 2019, 02:02
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: In the Trees
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Capt Colonial
Considering our colleagues over at Jetstar operate with two-crew where we operate with three crew I’d say you onto something Dragon Man! That will be in the following E.A.s etc of course!
Thin Edge of a Very Big Wedge!
i think you might find that our Jetstar cousins have introduced SO’s on most of their 787 flights now, couldn’t tell you what limit they use for 2 crew though.
ANCDU is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2019, 08:05
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So has the sun set on Project Sunrise?

Like Red Q, a Terminal Decline of Qantas International, JQ HK, a game changing alliance with EK and a Dubai hub all down the memory hole?
Will Qantas actually commit the CAP EX?
Will they actually admit their "project" in the end amounts to buying an off the shelf aircraft?

The question might now be posited, who cops the blame?
  1. The pesky pilots who wouldn't do more for less?
  2. The manufacturer who would only offer a product off the shelf, not committing to a few billion in R& D for Qantas to order 12...
  3. The Regulator, who despite Chairman's Lounge membership and upgrades, just can't give Qantas what the "business case" demands like a 30 hour day...
Rated De is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2019, 09:24
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Sydney
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rated De
So has the sun set on Project Sunrise?

Like Red Q, a Terminal Decline of Qantas International, JQ HK, a game changing alliance with EK and a Dubai hub all down the memory hole?
Will Qantas actually commit the CAP EX?
Will they actually admit their "project" in the end amounts to buying an off the shelf aircraft?

The question might now be posited, who cops the blame?
  1. The pesky pilots who wouldn't do more for less?
  2. The manufacturer who would only offer a product off the shelf, not committing to a few billion in R& D for Qantas to order 12...
  3. The Regulator, who despite Chairman's Lounge membership and upgrades, just can't give Qantas what the "business case" demands like a 30 hour day...
Rated, Qantas has consistently stated that it would make a decision by the end of the year, once it had an answer on all of these questions. It has the answer on Airbus and Boeing's offer, and appears to have been quite happy with the specs. On the others, it is working with CASA and the unions on crewing, both of which will take time. There is literally no new news here - why don't we wait and see what happens, rather than hypothesising or constructing narratives in advance?
PlasticFantastic is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2019, 09:55
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,625
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
Originally Posted by PlasticFantastic
Rated, Qantas has consistently stated that it would make a decision by the end of the year, once it had an answer on all of these questions. It has the answer on Airbus and Boeing's offer, and appears to have been quite happy with the specs. On the others, it is working with CASA and the unions on crewing, both of which will take time. There is literally no new news here - why don't we wait and see what happens, rather than hypothesising or constructing narratives in advance?
Why shouldn’t he, this is a rumour site and for me personally I enjoy reading other peoples thoughts and then been able to look back down the track and see who was closest to been correct.
dragon man is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2019, 09:58
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: I prefer to remain north of a direct line BNE-ADL
Age: 48
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 10 Posts
At last a decent response from AIPA, it’s 787 conditions or better or invest otherwise, you little beauty.
Angle of Attack is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2019, 10:43
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,625
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
Originally Posted by Angle of Attack
At last a decent response from AIPA, it’s 787 conditions or better or invest otherwise, you little beauty.
I would have thought better as a minimum for an aircraft that will be 50% heavier and flight deck duty times that will increase by 40%.
dragon man is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2019, 12:47
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Sydney
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dragon man


I would have thought better as a minimum for an aircraft that will be 50% heavier and flight deck duty times that will increase by 40%.
Agreed! I would have assumed that the starting point for AIPA would be 787 + X.
PlasticFantastic is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2019, 23:46
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 356
Received 115 Likes on 46 Posts
Agreed! I would have assumed that the starting point for AIPA would be 787 + X.
There’s still effectively two long haul awards.
Why start with the 787 award when the A330 conditions provide for a lower hourly rate?
C441 is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 00:17
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 617
Received 153 Likes on 48 Posts
Perhaps you misread the email or relied on the quote above but what was actually written was...
On this basis, the AIPA CoM has directed that there will be no reduction to the terms and conditions for the operation of the B787 aircraft.
(My bold)

So this is not an indication of what they would accept for the ‘Sunrise’ aircraft. I am sure they will be pushing for better terms and conditions on whatever aircraft that may turn out to be.
Beer Baron is online now  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 00:28
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Beer Baron

So this is not an indication of what they would accept for the ‘Sunrise’ aircraft. I am sure they will be pushing for better terms and conditions on whatever aircraft that may turn out to be.
That was my understanding too.
Am I correct in saying that the premise for the company acquiring more 787 aircraft was predicated on renegotiating the current contract?
ilikecheese is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 00:32
  #111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PlasticFantastic
Agreed! I would have assumed that the starting point for AIPA would be 787 + X.
787-plus will be significantly less than A330 as it is. The flat rate is a disaster for anything beyond Hawaii.
ConfigFull is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 00:32
  #112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,625
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
The company want a lowering of some 787 conditions as an offset to by the sunrise aircraft.
dragon man is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 00:59
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 608
Received 67 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by dragon man
The company want a lowering of some 787 conditions as an offset to by the sunrise aircraft.
And I want a helicopter and a red Ferrari.

What we want is not always reasonable or entitled to be taken seriously.
itsnotthatbloodyhard is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 01:05
  #114 (permalink)  
rep
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: adelaide
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And which conditions do they want lowered?
rep is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 01:11
  #115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just because they offer lower conditions, doesn’t mean you have to move fleet.
Blueskymine is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 01:22
  #116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: TIBA
Posts: 461
Received 129 Likes on 37 Posts
Post

Originally Posted by dragon man
The company want a lowering of some 787 conditions as an offset to by the sunrise aircraft.

Have another read of what was actually demanded. I had to. Quite a development!

Move productivity required even after 30% given on an agreement with the ink still wet before any more 787’s ordered in addition to Project Sunrire.
CaptCloudbuster is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 02:42
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hasn’t Qantas just taken delivery of another 787 Sim (2 787 Sims in Sydney plus about 50% use of Jetstar sim in Melbourne). Pretty poor planning by Qantas if they are only going to have a fleet of 14 aircraft!

Considering 3 737 Sims for 80 aircraft??

-438 is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 02:47
  #118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,625
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
They have two sims with a rumoured third coming to Brisbane . They have the remaining optioned aircraft at a never to be repeated price, they will order them IMO. It’s all about bullying the pilots with shiny jet syndrome.
dragon man is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 02:48
  #119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Vietnam
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just do a press release and say the third sim is a "game changer" and everything is ok
pilotchute is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2019, 02:52
  #120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,625
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
Originally Posted by ConfigFull
787-plus will be significantly less than A330 as it is. The flat rate is a disaster for anything beyond Hawaii.
You got it, but we are told that as 82% voted for it it was a great deal. Welcome to the brave new world of fleet pay based on the 787 with no overtime.
dragon man is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.