Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Project Sunrise

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jan 2024, 13:21
  #2081 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Asia
Posts: 614
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
Current 350-1000 driver here

Is QF getting these aeroplanes with extra tank capacity?

Max fuel is 124.6t, MTOW 316t, DOW is about 155-156t, hence payload available is around 33t give or take.

At 6.5-7t per hour this is going to get very tight, especially in JFK with frontal thunderstorms in summer or snowstorms in winter

Good news is that out of SYD or JFK even on a hot day you can still make it at MTOW
AQIS Boigu is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 21st Jan 2024, 21:47
  #2082 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: At work
Posts: 40
Received 83 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by dr dre
The 12 Sunrise 350s will mostly be flying out of Sydney but the additional 350s to start replacing the 330s will arrive just a year later. So then it’ll be probable most current 330 flying and bases will be transitioned to 330/350, but there’s also the capability to have 350 only pilots.



Two LH EBA negotiations for instance
You’re not factoring in the companies industry leading flight planning software capability and its years of experience.

On a side note, they’ll probably make more money from Airbus not being able to do it via contractual compensation than if they flew the route.
Big Silver Spoon is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 00:19
  #2083 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Lagrangian point 2
Posts: 282
Received 33 Likes on 7 Posts
Yes they are getting an extra tank. Don’t know how big. This is the source of some of the conjecture on it all, as its structure has added some weight which Airbus is working on.

MTOW is currently at 319 tonnes with scope to go to 322 tonnes.

At 248 maximum pax config, Full pax plus bags and even a bit of freight is plausible.
ExtraShot is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 01:13
  #2084 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 15 Posts
A max capacity of 250 passengers will make the tickets prohibitively expensive and people will opt for a cheaper ticket with a stop over.

Singapore Airlines SIN nonstop to JFK is premium economy and business/first only. No standard economy. This in turn makes the cheapest ticket double the price of Cathay and Turkish etc.

If SYD to LHR non stop is $4k, but I can get it for 3k with a stop in Singapore/Dubai etc I am taking the stop.
Climb150 is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by Climb150:
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 02:03
  #2085 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Lagrangian point 2
Posts: 282
Received 33 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Climb150
A max capacity of 250 passengers will make the tickets prohibitively expensive and people will opt for a cheaper ticket with a stop over.

Singapore Airlines SIN nonstop to JFK is premium economy and business/first only. No standard economy. This in turn makes the cheapest ticket double the price of Cathay and Turkish etc.

If SYD to LHR non stop is $4k, but I can get it for 3k with a stop in Singapore/Dubai etc I am taking the stop.

People said the same things about Perth - London… there’s an entire thread of it here somewhere.

Yet it’s been a relatively big success.

These aircraft are able to be reconfigured if it doesn’t work. It’s not the end of the world.
ExtraShot is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 02:17
  #2086 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 15 Posts
The Perth to London nonstop is only about $300 dollars more than the competition. People will tolerate $300 for the convenience.
Climb150 is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 03:02
  #2087 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,468
Received 310 Likes on 116 Posts
I think a lot of people are forgetting that business people want direct and fast. They don’t care about cost and comfort is irrelevant when you’re in a premium class.
morno is online now  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 03:59
  #2088 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 355
Received 111 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
The great circle route from Sydney to London goes vey near to HongKong, through China and then Russia and the Baltic Sea.

Wasn’t this an old Qantas route from Australia to London via HongKong?
Yep. QF29/30. A great way for junior filth like me to get to LHR and back.
MEL-HKG-LHR-HKG-MEL. 3 mostly daylight sectors out of 4, although the first was a midnight departure from Melbourne.
HKG-LHR & HKG MEL were both morning departures. LHR-HKG lunchtime out of London.
About as civilised as a London trip could get…..especially for a commuter.

A well respected Airline Networks expert twice tried to recommend to the board that this route be reinstated in addition to the QF9/10 Perth flights. After the second attempt he was sacked and escorted out of QCC immediately. I believe he wasn't out of work for long, such was his reputation in the industry.

Last edited by C441; 22nd Jan 2024 at 04:37.
C441 is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by C441:
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 04:11
  #2089 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 16
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Climb150
A max capacity of 250 passengers will make the tickets prohibitively expensive and people will opt for a cheaper ticket with a stop over.
And yet QF9/10 has the highest load factor of any QF route.
hazza4257 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 05:15
  #2090 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,624
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
The problem with the 29/30 was that Qantas was restricted under 5th/6th freedom rights to a maximum uplift x HKG of only 50% HKG origin passengers. Having said that I thought it was the best option from Australia to London on Qantas.
dragon man is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 08:50
  #2091 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Asia
Posts: 614
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by dragon man
The problem with the 29/30 was that Qantas was restricted under 5th/6th freedom rights to a maximum uplift x HKG of only 50% HKG origin passengers. Having said that I thought it was the best option from Australia to London on Qantas.
I believe it was also the only departure where you had the full day available in Oz rather than departing at 2-3pm like the other Euro bound flights (via SIN and BKK).
AQIS Boigu is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 18:51
  #2092 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by hazza4257
And yet QF9/10 has the highest load factor of any QF route.
If you read my response you would see that I addressed this fact.
Climb150 is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 23:50
  #2093 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Coal Face
Posts: 1,293
Received 328 Likes on 125 Posts
Originally Posted by Climb150
The Perth to London nonstop is only about $300 dollars more than the competition. People will tolerate $300 for the convenience.
Nearly $4K more on a Business Saver fare.
Chronic Snoozer is online now  
The following 3 users liked this post by Chronic Snoozer:
Old 23rd Jan 2024, 08:21
  #2094 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: East of Westralia
Posts: 681
Received 107 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by Chronic Snoozer
Nearly $4K more on a Business Saver fare.
And yet, always full. 👍
ScepticalOptomist is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.