Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas A321 Freighter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jan 2021, 00:10
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sending her back to Singas for a refund?

Patch away all they want, is it really going to fix the problems? What a waste of time and money this whole thing has been.
wheels_down is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2021, 00:18
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wheels_down
Sending her back to Singas for a refund?

Patch away all they want, is it really going to fix the problems? What a waste of time and money this whole thing has been.
Is anyone surprised? Who had this brilliant idea? Was it Andrew David or someone else? Anyone responsible won't be held to account.

The 767 and 737s haven't caused these problems so soon after entering service. And this at a time where freight is booming and we need every aircraft we can get.
Qantas 787 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2021, 01:35
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 189
Received 113 Likes on 31 Posts
It’s the first of its type. Of course there will be some teething issues. However there is nothing exotic about it, it’s just an airbus. The problems will get sorted.

It has significantly more capability than the 737s it will eventually replace.
The 737s are old and have payload issues as a result of the 9g barrier.
Are they supposed to keep flying relics forever?
davidclarke is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2021, 02:53
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 176
Received 24 Likes on 12 Posts
You need to expect 3 months from Entry into Service for teething problems to be ironed out. This is the same whether your talking B767, B757 B737 or A321. Only B737 with the Israeli mod are affected by the 9 G bulkhead. AEI mod is not affected. I believe there is a fix approved for the Israeli bulkhead. Not 100% sure how they are fixing it or how many man hours involved.
LAME2 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2021, 06:09
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: space
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I guarantee if you experience anything like a 9G deceleration the 9G barrier will be the last thing to worry about. Strapping PAG's is a waste of time. No PAG is going to get you as you are already squished like strawberry jam. Not much structural strength forward of the instrument panel is there?
zanthrus is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2021, 19:11
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: melbourne
Posts: 787
Received 66 Likes on 35 Posts
Originally Posted by Qantas 787
Is anyone surprised? Who had this brilliant idea? Was it Andrew David or someone else? Anyone responsible won't be held to account.

The 767 and 737s haven't caused these problems so soon after entering service. And this at a time where freight is booming and we need every aircraft we can get.
The 767 was a boeing built dedicated freighter & had only flown minimal hours when bought,there was a 2nd 1 on offer but that was turned down.
The 733's are all ex tn/qf converted pax aircraft so all history & records right there from day dot.
The 734( just like this 321) came along after a long career with many overseas airlines & what we are seeing is almost identical in the problems encountered after conversion due to its maintenance history at many overseas facilities.
Guess u get what u pay for.
blubak is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2021, 05:13
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: SEQ
Posts: 52
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Qantas freight has announced that A330 freighters will be introduced to the fleet in the future. Any information on how many and if these will replace the 767?
Will they be ex QF aircraft?
aseriesofleftturns is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2021, 06:42
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: ex EGNM, now NZRO
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unsure on that, but did anyone notice the 734 recently on the general Rumours page with destroyed main gear from a hard landing. Like most freighters it had a hard life.

734 hard landing @ Exeter

https://www.avherald.com/h?article=4e1e21a4&opt=0
.

Last edited by Anti Skid On; 8th Apr 2021 at 06:47. Reason: Added a link
Anti Skid On is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2021, 07:41
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Lagrangian point 2
Posts: 282
Received 33 Likes on 7 Posts
Qantas freight has announced that A330 freighters will be introduced to the fleet in the future
They have?
ExtraShot is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2021, 12:37
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,290
Received 167 Likes on 85 Posts
Id imagine the cost of having a simulator for a single aircraft is not viable.
What? How much electricity does a 767 Simulator use?
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2021, 14:29
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
What? How much electricity does a 767 Simulator use?
I don’t know. How much does it cost to move a simulator from Sydney to Brisbane?
Derfred is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2021, 20:16
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Derfred
I don’t know. How much does it cost to move a simulator from Sydney to Brisbane?

and back again in 18 months
goodonyamate is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2021, 21:23
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: East of Westralia
Posts: 681
Received 107 Likes on 31 Posts
The money they make by selling time in it to externals far outweighs the running costs!
ScepticalOptomist is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2021, 01:12
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Lagrangian point 2
Posts: 282
Received 33 Likes on 7 Posts
So where is this announcement?
ExtraShot is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2021, 01:22
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: passing a cloud
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
"tell him he's dreaming" is the answer to QF converting existing A330s to freighters about now.
simple facts
QF A330's are GE powered, Airbus has only certified PW & RR powered 330 freighters and given they have not sold a new build in years and there dozens of available machines for conversion no one will certified a GE powered machine.
TWOTBAGS is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2021, 02:02
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Weltschmerz-By-The-Sea, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,364
Received 77 Likes on 34 Posts
Would they even contemplate converting -200s which are almost all over 60,000 hrs and into the expensive Intermediate service goals part of their airframe life? Surely it would not escape their attention that the age/reliability curves have already been crossed?

Oh wait...a ground-breaking yet costly late life modification is right up their alley, so I am thinking its 75% a goer.
Australopithecus is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2021, 05:24
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 189
Received 113 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by TWOTBAGS
"tell him he's dreaming" is the answer to QF converting existing A330s to freighters about now.
simple facts
QF A330's are GE powered, Airbus has only certified PW & RR powered 330 freighters and given they have not sold a new build in years and there dozens of available machines for conversion no one will certified a GE powered machine.
The P2F conversions are certified for all engine types.
davidclarke is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2021, 12:56
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
Are the RAAF not taking the 200s?
PoppaJo is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2021, 05:40
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Canberra
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by PoppaJo
Are the RAAF not taking the 200s?
Why would the RAAF be taking anymore 200s? They took two to convey to KC30s and whilst they were offered a further two they were not of the same vintage and therefore RAAF declined the offer. No plans for any more.
HK144 is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2021, 08:03
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
EOI open for A321 both seats.

737 MEL also.

If they are firm on A321 only as they sort of mention, that will be an issue for many at Tiger however will suit many back home from KA.

Last edited by PoppaJo; 23rd Aug 2021 at 08:13.
PoppaJo is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.