Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Ozzies can’t fly when it’s windy?

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Ozzies can’t fly when it’s windy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Jul 2019, 20:08
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ozzies can’t fly when it’s windy?

What’s going on? Canselling MEL and CBR because it may get windy?
17 kts is too much?
Weird way of doing things.
ManaAdaSystem is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2019, 20:11
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, it’s most certainly the pilots who make the decision to CANSEL the sectors.... 🙄

Last edited by DHC4driver; 13th Jul 2019 at 02:07.
DHC4driver is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2019, 20:55
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sincity
Posts: 1,195
Received 33 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by ManaAdaSystem
What’s going on? Canselling MEL and CBR because it may get windy?
17 kts is too much?
Weird way of doing things.
At the risk of canning your hyperbole there is significant delays developing in Syd already this morning due to the capacity reductions associated with single runway - it was over 30 a short time ago and they're onto 25
maggot is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2019, 21:23
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Denmark
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ManaAdaSystem
What’s going on? Canselling MEL and CBR because it may get windy?
17 kts is too much?
Weird way of doing things.
I would agree little weather phenomena and OZ ATC melt down. Only 24kts crosswind on the parallels on current ATIS
Ragnor is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2019, 21:54
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why single runway ops?
And why only MEL and CBR (and the odd Gold Coast) flights?
ManaAdaSystem is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2019, 21:59
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aus
Age: 42
Posts: 381
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Single runway due to strong westerlies which means only the one east/west runway can be used and not the two north/south runways.

With capacity reductions in force, it’s up to the airlines to decide which services will be cancelled. Normally you would see Mel and the like canned due to the number of flights available during the day to recover pax.
turbantime is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2019, 23:09
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So they use single runway based on the forecasted and not the actual wind?
Wind has not been above 20 kts the whole morning. I love being proactive, but this is plain stupid.
ManaAdaSystem is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2019, 23:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aus
Age: 42
Posts: 381
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Whatever man, go whinge on a frequent flyers forum.
turbantime is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2019, 00:20
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 356
Received 115 Likes on 46 Posts
Ozzies can’t fly when it’s windy? What’s going on? Canselling MEL and CBR because it may get windy?
But hopefully they can spell a primary word in their post!
C441 is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2019, 00:41
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Cloud surfing
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by C441
But hopefully they can spell a primary word in their post!
Given his username relates to Malaysian Airlines, I'd hazard a guess OP is from that part of the world and english is not particularly hot there. What his beef is with the intricacies of how things work over here though ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Caedus is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2019, 01:04
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: NSW
Posts: 265
Received 178 Likes on 56 Posts
Originally Posted by ManaAdaSystem
So they use single runway based on the forecasted and not the actual wind?
Wind has not been above 20 kts the whole morning. I love being proactive, but this is plain stupid.
ATC would have looked at the forecast last night and decided under those conditions (single runway ops in Sydney) we can facilitate XXX number of movements. They then would of gone to the airlines and said "hey instead if the 80 slots (a made up number) in Sydney you normally get, you can only have 50. The airlines work it out from there.
Considering how long the ground delays can be just trying to get to RWY 25, I can only imagine the chaos if they didn't cancel flights.
It sucks your plans probably got altered but, it is what it is. You do understand that we don't enjoy it too? How many crews are going to get home hours late or over night in some other city despite the the plans they had with families etc. Probably plenty of controllers working hard and doing over time to (eventually) get you where you are going safely.
(they were probably doing that anyway though )
​​​
cLeArIcE is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2019, 01:52
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 283
Received 127 Likes on 36 Posts
They really do move to 25/07 far too early. Anything up to 30kts should be 16/34. Beyond that ok fine, but I can't think of a single transport category aircraft that can't land in 30 kts. So instead I get to drill holes in the sky over Boree whilst we operate our biggest airport at hobbled capacity.

@$!#

Don't even start me on SODPROPS on a weekend just to tick a box.
das Uber Soldat is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2019, 02:25
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,290
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
I'd imagine landing on 16R with a 30kt sou'wester would be quite sporting!
Capt Fathom is online now  
Old 13th Jul 2019, 02:26
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,071
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
Back in the day they would allow you to land on 16 if you requested it and the problem used to solve it self. Now by taking away decision making from the PIC they have created a bigger problem
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2019, 03:37
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Straya
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

10.3.1 Selection of Runway in Use

10.3.1.1 Use of other than nominated runways. Controllers must not nominate a particular runway for use if an alternative runway is available, when:

(a) for runway conditions that are completely dry:
(i) the cross-wind component, including gusts, exceeds 20 KT;
(ii) the downwind component, including gusts, exceeds 5 KT.
(b) for runway conditions that are not completely dry;
(i) the cross-wind component, including gusts, exceeds 20 KT;
(ii) there is a downwind component.
GreenGhost39 is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2019, 09:16
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kichin
Posts: 1,048
Received 694 Likes on 190 Posts
Aaaah Sydney. It’s annoying that it’s too dangerous to land in a moderate crosswind there but landing at max elsewhere is ok. It should be up to the PIC.
gordonfvckingramsay is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2019, 09:26
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 273
Received 39 Likes on 20 Posts
However going into Melbourne late at night it’s not uncommon to be landing with 20kts crosswind and 5kts tail wind on a 2300m runway because they are only using 34 for departures NE....🙄

Having said all that - I acknowledge that the arrival rates are determined the evening prior based on a forecast, so essentially the damage is done then.

It wasn’t uncommon to see 120 minute COBT delays today - not fun for anyone.
Colonel_Klink is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2019, 09:33
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Australia/India
Posts: 5,287
Received 419 Likes on 209 Posts
Two words:

1. Politics.

2. Money (to the extent that politics don't equal money).

Sorry, I meant one word: Safety.
Lead Balloon is online now  
Old 13th Jul 2019, 10:49
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: The Outback
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Colonel_Klink
However going into Melbourne late at night it’s not uncommon to be landing with 20kts crosswind and 5kts tail wind on a 2300m runway because they are only using 34 for departures NE....🙄
Exactly the situation last night - 30min airborne delays around 8pm because they were running RW27 only when the wind was around 15kts from the north west. But hey, it’s world’s best practice in Australia, right?

On another note... anyone on here have any info why MEL is the only airport in Aus that seems to change their ATIS every 5-10min most days?
donkey767 is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2019, 11:25
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Under the sea
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE]Exactly the situation last night - 30min airborne delays around 8pm because they were running RW27 only when the wind was around 15kts from the north west. But hey, it’s world’s best practice in Australia, right?

On another note... anyone on here have any info why MEL is the only airport in Aus that seems to change their ATIS every 5-10min most days?/QUOTE]

The large amount of ATIS changes is dictated by the Tower controllers and only by the Tower controllers. I suspect most of it is purely about "a-se" covering if something were to occur! Melbourne definitely holds a unique place in the world of aviation controlling on a few fronts.
ESP eclipse II is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.