Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Jetstar EBA 2019

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Dec 2019, 21:36
  #541 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kichin
Posts: 1,048
Received 694 Likes on 190 Posts
That assumes an unlimited supply (like they did with pilots) of $40 bogans. Even they will get jack of management incompetence eating into their pi$$ drinking time in Bali.

Last edited by gordonfvckingramsay; 31st Dec 2019 at 01:14.
gordonfvckingramsay is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2019, 21:50
  #542 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mulisector
Might be a silly question but ... why would anyone be so scared of a lockout, last time QF shut for 2 days and government forced it to re-open. Seemed like company lost a lot more money than the pilots 2 days of pay ?


Exactly. No one should be scared of a lockout. All it means is that the employer is preventing the locked out employees from performing any work and therefore will not be paying them for the days they are locked out:


https://www.fwc.gov.au/industrial-ac...loyer-response



In the case of JQ pilots this is effectively closing down the business for the period of the lockout. This action would likely do much more harm to the business than to the pilots.

PG

Last edited by Popgun; 31st Dec 2019 at 01:01.
Popgun is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2019, 23:21
  #543 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Ballarat
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE


My concern is what would a protracted industrial dispute achieve?

The AFAP have already conceded that they will bargain within Qantas’ 3% wages policy and that even if we get what we want, we will still be the lowest paid airline pilots in the country.

All they seem to be arguing about at the moment is a minimum daily credit and an expansion of the high line allowance (which is an opt in system to get a dollar amount per duty hour in exchange for extra standby days).

These items aren’t personally that significant to me, but others may feel that it’s worth the fight. Back of the clocks are becoming overnights, that’s a massive issue resolved as far as I’m concerned.
What does rolling over and acquiescing to the companies demands with barely a whimper achieve? Beyond of course ensuring massive bonuses to an executive team who have already demonstrated a willingness to take money from your pocket, and put it straight into theirs (see 18 month pay freeze).

I honestly don't understand the position of 'oh well, sure, we're paid the least and do the most, and our management is cleaning up making millions, but thats ok I guess.' I don't mean to be disrespectful but you're never going to get anything in life unless you're prepared to fight for it. The company would happily pay us all minimum wage if they could get away with it, the fact that you're paid 100k+ a year is solely because people fought for it, and our labour is in limited supply.

This is legal, protected action. We're not asking to be the best paid pilots in the industry, not even close. We just don't want to be left miles behind in last place whilst others massively profit off us. I don't think thats particularly unreasonable.

To illustrate how absurd our position currently is, if we did get a pure 15% pay rise as the company claims we're chasing, we'd STILL be the lowest paid pilots of the major 4.

If that doesn't put our negotiation in perspective then I don't know what possibly could.
Paddleboat is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2019, 02:46
  #544 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking ahead, A Level 4 Tiger and, Virgin captain (73,A320) will earn north of 350,000, in the the middle of the impending next decade. Comparing comparable hours (900), o/t, s/b, eba inflation, allowances between.

On the same comparable basis, using the same figures as above, a Jetstar Captain is about 270,000, not even mentioning half the fleet will be 230 seating. The next problem is the gap is growing positively toward TT and VA. Thats not even taking into account MAX 10 wage increases at the VA Group next decade, its fairly clear that 321neo wages increases will be few and thin at this mob.

Paddleboat is right. Getting off the lowest paid ladder shouldn't be the focus here, closing that gap needs to be. The calculator does not lie. Run the numbers.

Otherwise 2030 will arrive and you will be 100 grand behind. Possibly even more.

Last edited by wheels_down; 31st Dec 2019 at 03:02.
wheels_down is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2019, 02:50
  #545 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 29
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE


My concern is what would a protracted industrial dispute achieve?

The AFAP have already conceded that they will bargain within Qantas’ 3% wages policy and that even if we get what we want, we will still be the lowest paid airline pilots in the country.

All they seem to be arguing about at the moment is a minimum daily credit and an expansion of the high line allowance (which is an opt in system to get a dollar amount per duty hour in exchange for extra standby days).

These items aren’t personally that significant to me, but others may feel that it’s worth the fight. Back of the clocks are becoming overnights, that’s a massive issue resolved as far as I’m concerned.
ECAM,

Those items like 5hrs MDC are fairly significant because they basically allow QF board to be seen keeping its 3% but in the reality if those items are applied to standbys and all duties .... those guys/girls won’t be working 3 months for FREE when compared to Tiger Air, the 20% pay gap will close significantly.

do you genuinely think it’s fair for our Pilots to work 3 months for free compared to Tiger’s despite flying 50 extra pax around on a321’s? Not to mention no joint seniority or ability to join mid-way up the parents company seniority list as TIger/virgin receive.

Also you’ve got to know those BOCs were dangerous, I guess it’s more a thanks for fixing what should of never been....

mulisector is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2019, 12:11
  #546 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,170
Received 196 Likes on 97 Posts
Originally Posted by wheels_down
Looking ahead, A Level 4 Tiger and, Virgin captain (73,A320) will earn north of 350,000, in the the middle of the impending next decade. Comparing comparable hours (900), o/t, s/b, eba inflation, allowances between.

On the same comparable basis, using the same figures as above, a Jetstar Captain is about 270,000, not even mentioning half the fleet will be 230 seating. The next problem is the gap is growing positively toward TT and VA. Thats not even taking into account MAX 10 wage increases at the VA Group next decade, its fairly clear that 321neo wages increases will be few and thin at this mob.

Paddleboat is right. Getting off the lowest paid ladder shouldn't be the focus here, closing that gap needs to be. The calculator does not lie. Run the numbers.

Otherwise 2030 will arrive and you will be 100 grand behind. Possibly even more.
When making all of these wondrous prognostications about what Tiger and Virgin Captain's will be earning in the the middle of the impending next decade, does it not concern you that that business has run up losses of over $1 billion in just the last four years? It's been the best part of a decade since the airline made any money.

There's a not unreasonable chance that Virgin and a very good chance that Tiger will have gone broke before the the middle of the impending next decade. Does business viability figure in your calculations anywhere?
MickG0105 is online now  
Old 31st Dec 2019, 21:44
  #547 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,625
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
Originally Posted by MickG0105
When making all of these wondrous prognostications about what Tiger and Virgin Captain's will be earning in the the middle of the impending next decade, does it not concern you that that business has run up losses of over $1 billion in just the last four years? It's been the best part of a decade since the airline made any money.

There's a not unreasonable chance that Virgin and a very good chance that Tiger will have gone broke before the the middle of the impending next decade. Does business viability figure in your calculations anywhere?
In all due respect the viability of the business is the owners/managers problem. Every year the fares go up to reflect the increase in the wages bill. I would suggest that Virgins problems have been largely due to bad management, only time will tell.
dragon man is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2019, 22:28
  #548 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dragon man


In all due respect the viability of the business is the owners/managers problem. Every year the fares go up to reflect the increase in the wages bill. I would suggest that Virgins problems have been largely due to bad management, only time will tell.
As a point of interest, wasn't Qantas "terminal" and "transformed" by the same airline Super Executive management team, using the same aircraft, same staff and same contracts..
The future is difficult to assess!
Rated De is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2019, 23:54
  #549 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MickG0105
When making all of these wondrous prognostications about what Tiger and Virgin Captain's will be earning in the the middle of the impending next decade, does it not concern you that that business has run up losses of over $1 billion in just the last four years? It's been the best part of a decade since the airline made any money.

There's a not unreasonable chance that Virgin and a very good chance that Tiger will have gone broke before the the middle of the impending next decade. Does business viability figure in your calculations anywhere?
Pilot salaries are such a tiny fraction of the total costs of running a large airline that they will neither make nor break the ensuing profits.

In the exact same way that executive remuneration neither makes nor breaks the profits either. Otherwise we would be seeing disastrous losses at the QF Group given the disturbingly high levels of take home pay by management in recent years.

No, this resistance to agreeing to a fair and respectable new pilot contract at JQ is all about ideology and ego...not economics.

The proof of this is the many denied non-monetary contract conditions that would cost the business absolutely nothing.

Adversarial ideology...not dollars and sense.

PG
Popgun is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2020, 01:12
  #550 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Popgun
Pilot salaries are such a tiny fraction of the total costs of running a large airline that they will neither make nor break the ensuing profits.

In the exact same way that executive remuneration neither makes nor breaks the profits either. Otherwise we would be seeing disastrous losses at the QF Group given the disturbingly high levels of take home pay by management in recent years.

No, this resistance to agreeing to a fair and respectable new pilot contract at JQ is all about ideology and ego...not economics.

The proof of this is the many denied non-monetary contract conditions that would cost the business absolutely nothing.

Adversarial ideology...not dollars and sense.

PG
Yes, its the small things like confirmed business on group Aircraft for duty travel, lounge access, commuter lounge access etc that make the difference in the contracts.

Onload onto JQ aircraft is also painful when it’s a first come best dressed basis. It should be DOJ just like mainline.

Anyway it’s a new year. Happy new year to my Jetstar peers and I hope you get a fair and reasonable deal early this year.


Blueskymine is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2020, 02:22
  #551 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 80
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Blueskymine
Onload onto JQ aircraft is also painful when it’s a first come best dressed basis. It should be DOJ just like mainline.
JQ onload is first registered first on
Chris2303 is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2020, 02:41
  #552 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,468
Received 310 Likes on 116 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris2303
JQ onload is first registered first on
Which I think is the fairest way. Who cares how long you’ve worked there for if someone got themselves organised 30 days ago and booked it, vs someone who decided the day before they’d like to travel.
morno is online now  
Old 1st Jan 2020, 05:48
  #553 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by morno


Which I think is the fairest way. Who cares how long you’ve worked there for if someone got themselves organised 30 days ago and booked it, vs someone who decided the day before they’d like to travel.
Yeah, which discriminates against operational staff who have to book when leave slots are released, verse office staff and management who can book well ahead.
Blueskymine is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2020, 07:15
  #554 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,468
Received 310 Likes on 116 Posts
Originally Posted by Blueskymine


Yeah, which discriminates against operational staff who have to book when leave slots are released, verse office staff and management who can book well ahead.
There’s a limit of around 30 days that you can book ahead. So your claim has no basis.
morno is online now  
Old 1st Jan 2020, 07:21
  #555 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Adversarial ideology...not dollars and sense.
Not really. It is a cost base that can't be reduced. It isn't as easy to make pilots redundant as it is office or front-line staff, so, in managing this more restricted cost base - the best course of action is not NOT let it increase. Plus - as I have said before - if they conceed - it sets the precedent. That, must not happen. This is why they will not budge.

lounge access, commuter lounge access etc
Dear me - this is getting a little precious. Lounge access is over the top. What do you need that for?
PPRuNeUser0198 is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2020, 07:34
  #556 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by morno

There’s a limit of around 30 days that you can book ahead. So your claim has no basis.
Ahhhh...but there IS a basis....

QF pilots have an 8 week roster while JQ pilots are monthly. So JQ pilots usually get second pick dregs on their own metal (or plastic) and then of course are solid second class pariahs on the mothership aircraft as well. (JQ captains bumped by QF SOs...JQ FOs bumped by QF Flight Attendants)

Some are more equal than others within the highly profitable Qantas Group. It is, for example, salt-wounded situations like this that have the guys (and gals) quite appropriately drawing a line in the sand.

Make EVERYONE equal on ALL group aircraft; Or, if a 2 caste system is insisted upon, a JQ staff member MUST be placed ahead of ALL QF staff on a JQ aeroplane. I know many orange poor cousins who have had a gut full of being treated so disrespectfully.

PG

Popgun is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2020, 07:51
  #557 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by T-Vasis
Dear me - this is getting a little precious. Lounge access is over the top. What do you need that for?
Yes, I guess it is a bit OTT. Just like home transport, industry standard crew rest facilities and adequate LOL insurance etc, etc, etc for mainline pilots!

Your viewpoint is obtuse.

It is a matter of fairness and parity (and costs so small to be absolutely irrelevant).

If a QF pilot and a JQ pilot are both paxing duty travel on a QF aircraft SYD-HNL to operate an aircraft back to SYD, why should the QF pilot get to relax in the lounge when the JQ pilot is barred from entry? It is just petty, bloody mindedness.

PG
Popgun is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2020, 08:33
  #558 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: australia
Posts: 19
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You don't seem to mention about all of the QF staff that JQ pilots now beat to a seat on QF metal. JQ pilots don't do too bad now.
pocker pipty is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2020, 08:42
  #559 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does a QF pilot on Duty Travel get lounge access today?
PPRuNeUser0198 is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2020, 09:11
  #560 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: East of Westralia
Posts: 682
Received 109 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by T-Vasis
Does a QF pilot on Duty Travel get lounge access today?
Yep. Sure do.
ScepticalOptomist is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.