2nd North South Runway at Melbourne Airport
Remember WHY Tulla was built way out in the sticks? No houses anywhere near anything?
Then the councils allow land to be developed right up to the boundary. Then the noise complaints begin. Same as every airport in Oz.
Then the councils allow land to be developed right up to the boundary. Then the noise complaints begin. Same as every airport in Oz.
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Dunda
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Developers (none of whom live under flight paths) bribe councils to change the rules. Councils get development targets imposed upon them by state governments and are stuck between a rock and a hard place, federal government approves the visas thanks to developer lobbying.
The circle of life, not dissimilar to a holding pattern.
After YMML opened the Melways pages for adjacent empty land all carried a printed message “Future noise corridor”. The next time I bought a Melways in 1995 (?) that information had been removed. That’s about when houses were being built for the future “no aircraft noise” party members.
The logical solution is to build a new airport further from the city with a rapid transit link to the city, an airport that has the passenger terminals between the parallel runways and maintenance and cargo facilities on the outside of the runways. $$ yes, but any additional runway at YMML (irrespective of the orientation or location) will be a major compromise.
V
and if you go back to the mid 70s melways there’s a THIRD north south runway earmarked. Roughly where Airport Drive Porsche centre is now.
https://digitised-collections.unimel...14&isAllowed=y
edit. It wasn’t a third NS runway. Rather it seems that from the melways archives the Airport Drive north south runway was changed in 1990 to be the location of the current proposal.
After YMML opened the Melways pages for adjacent empty land all carried a printed message “Future noise corridor”. The next time I bought a Melways in 1995 (?) that information had been removed. That’s about when houses were being built for the future “no aircraft noise” party members.
https://digitised-collections.unimel...14&isAllowed=y
edit. It wasn’t a third NS runway. Rather it seems that from the melways archives the Airport Drive north south runway was changed in 1990 to be the location of the current proposal.
Last edited by compressor stall; 29th Jun 2019 at 11:35.
Evertonian
V
and if you go back to the mid 70s melways there’s a THIRD north south runway earmarked. Roughly where Airport Drive Porsche centre is now.
https://digitised-collections.unimel...14&isAllowed=y
edit. It wasn’t a third NS runway. Rather it seems that from the melways archives the Airport Drive north south runway was changed in 1990 to be the location of the current proposal.
and if you go back to the mid 70s melways there’s a THIRD north south runway earmarked. Roughly where Airport Drive Porsche centre is now.
https://digitised-collections.unimel...14&isAllowed=y
edit. It wasn’t a third NS runway. Rather it seems that from the melways archives the Airport Drive north south runway was changed in 1990 to be the location of the current proposal.
That would be presumably as you can’t land a 380 on the east west runway.
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ahh the good old days. I worked out at Tulla started 1979 at the fuel depot (JUHI) back then there was always talk of a 3rd Rwy being built very soon, I guess soon wasn't anytime soon back then:-)
Side note: As most would know the drome was designed for the largest jets of the day B707 DC8 Etc so when the Jumbo Jets turned up not long after Tulla was opened it was chaos as the hydrants the gates etc needed extensive modification, I recall many a late night on the apron with crews modifying the Hydrant system that was only a few years old!:-)
Another side note (sorry): Being involved with much of the underground beneath Tulla I always laugh when I hear about a train station being already there for the future rail link to Tulla, trust me there are LOTS of hidden tunnels & locked steel doors down there, it's a rat infested rabbit warren where you could get lost & never be seen again!:-):-)
40 years latter I'm still waiting for that 3rd Rwy...………..will be another 40 years before we see it if ever!:-)
trust me there are LOTS of hidden tunnels & locked steel doors down there, it's a rat infested rabbit warren where you could get lost & never be seen again!:-):-)
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I asked around at the time out of curiosity but none one knew & or was willing to say what was behind those seriously locked doors. All I recall these days (as it was 40 years ago now) is that the doors where large, heavy in construction & had plenty of red sign on them, red meaning danger! It was a damp dark creepy place under the airport with dripping water everywhere &pipes going in all directions, the airport was built on top of a creek! EPA these days would have a fit! If ya hated ya boss you could hide him out of sight out of mind for decades down there !:-) I took my now ex wife down there one W/E back in the days before security was out of control & you could wander around the tarmac etc in thongs!!!, she hated it, hated the rats that ran between her feet, typical girl...heheh
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Behind a CB near you
Age: 44
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There’s a runway 09 in Melbourne? News to me.
Out of curiosity, what is the actual reason we're not allowed to use 09? Does anyone actually know?
I fly into Melbourne weekly and its now an almost nightly thing to get a flow time for LIZZI (or other feeder fixes) for arrivals at or after midnight with both runways in use.
I used it a couple of times early this year in the middle of the night. I cant remember why but it may have been runway works on 16/34 and something going on down at the 27 threshold?
Out of curiosity, what is the actual reason we're not allowed to use 09? Does anyone actually know?
I fly into Melbourne weekly and its now an almost nightly thing to get a flow time for LIZZI (or other feeder fixes) for arrivals at or after midnight with both runways in use.
Out of curiosity, what is the actual reason we're not allowed to use 09? Does anyone actually know?
I fly into Melbourne weekly and its now an almost nightly thing to get a flow time for LIZZI (or other feeder fixes) for arrivals at or after midnight with both runways in use.
If/when you work it out, can you let us all know the answer also?
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There was a picture online a while back of a cavity with support columns underneath the pick up/drop off area out the front of International. ‘Apparently’ a provision for a future airport rail platform/station.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes but they dont have to contend with politicians wanting aircraft away from view of their balcony, residents upset because an aircraft makes less noise than their nearest road or trainline, or airlines that want to dictate how an airport is built just to suit them and nobody else....
I don't think the good people of Daxing have votes..........................
That's the problem with democracy - people insist on being heard................
That's the problem with democracy - people insist on being heard................
YMML - Preference is for 3rd RWY to be N/S orientation
Announced on ABC News at 0830WST, Ch 24, that YMML Airport has a preference for the 3rd RWY to be N/S orientation, after consultation with the industry.
(Much) More to follow, I would imagine.....
Would this be 'bye' to the ML Airport Golf Club....?
Possible relocation of the TAAAATS Centre....?
OVAH...!!!.
(Much) More to follow, I would imagine.....
Would this be 'bye' to the ML Airport Golf Club....?
Possible relocation of the TAAAATS Centre....?
OVAH...!!!.