Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Qantas B744 stick shaker event near Hong Kong

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas B744 stick shaker event near Hong Kong

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Mar 2019, 11:28
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The bush
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Mach E Avelli
George Glass tells it how it is.
At the end of a long day none of us are at our best.
The ATSB report states that fatigue was not considered a factor. But does not provide a summary of how many days worked in last month, duty hours in last week, preceding rest, time of sign on etc.
maybe the poor buggers in recent B737 crashes were "not at their best" and most definitely work longer and harder than most, but the keyboard warrior attitude toward them has been less forgiving than in this particular case.
It seems if a non caucsasian has an incident it is pilot error (black and white-pun intended) and if a white man fxxks up it is caused by some mythical phenonema that calls for a PhD thesis study.

Just sayin'....

Last edited by The Banjo; 30th Mar 2019 at 11:42.
The Banjo is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2019, 15:09
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: BackofBourke
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE
Do you think they'd have put it back in the air if it wasn't insurable after the repairs? That it went back into the air means QF's standing with the aviation hull insurers was pretty good.[/QUOTE]

$100 million to repair, couldn’t be sold in 2012, then scrapped. Ouch.


Last edited by tio540; 30th Mar 2019 at 15:19.
tio540 is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2019, 16:32
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bottom of the Harbour
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts




I know that this is an open forum, but do we really need to put up with clowns nursing a grievance and who have never commanded anything bigger than a row boat?
Holding, especially at the end of a long flight, is a high threat environment.
Nice quote George. "I am a QF pilot I have had a long day, and I to need to hold??" absolves this pilots actions?

You my friend have just added to the ignorance of what was a serious incident.

Is Sydneeey.... any different to Heathrow, JFK, Hong Kong or Shanghai?

By criticising what I believe is constructive pilot input adds to the pilot big QF big jet syndrome. This is a stuff up, accept that, accept the criticism and move on.
The more I read the defence of this incident only reaffirms my belief that Australia is living under a big fish, small pond syndrome.

This was a serious incident, now we need to justify the circumstances because it was QF?
KABOY is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2019, 22:00
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,193
Received 152 Likes on 102 Posts
I don’t think anyone is defending these guys because they are the Great QF. And other than headline grabber journos like BB and GT, not many have attempted to play the racial issue, by claiming Caucasians are better pilots. Some have rightly called into question training standards in certain countries, but that is not so much a racial issue as a corporate cultural issue. Also in those places where corruption and nepotism is accepted there should be serious concerns about standards. I have seen enough poor performing Caucasian pilots in my time to know that ability is not exclusive to any race.
When there is a major screw up, the old Swiss cheese thingie tells us that usually more than one factor was causal. Fatigue is often played down by the ATSB because they don’t have the science to quantify it, or perhaps are reluctant to cross the mighty Qantas.

Last edited by Mach E Avelli; 30th Mar 2019 at 22:15.
Mach E Avelli is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2019, 22:15
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sincity
Posts: 1,195
Received 33 Likes on 17 Posts
What speed should the FMS have flown? Ie. How much different to the expected hold speed at F160?
not familiar with that jet
maggot is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2019, 05:19
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KABOY





Nice quote George. "I am a QF pilot I have had a long day, and I to need to hold??" absolves this pilots actions?

You my friend have just added to the ignorance of what was a serious incident.

Is Sydneeey.... any different to Heathrow, JFK, Hong Kong or Shanghai?

By criticising what I believe is constructive pilot input adds to the pilot big QF big jet syndrome. This is a stuff up, accept that, accept the criticism and move on.
The more I read the defence of this incident only reaffirms my belief that Australia is living under a big fish, small pond syndrome.

This was a serious incident, now we need to justify the circumstances because it was QF?
KABOY I think you are wasting yr time with some in here remember it's QF, they have a LOT of QF FanBoyz who can do no wrong!
There are NO excuses for this event, there a reasons for sure, two different things that some seem to confuse!


machtuk is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2019, 05:30
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,551
Received 73 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by Maggot
What speed should the FMS have flown? Ie. How much different to the expected hold speed at F160?
not familiar with that jet
Nor, it would seem, is the ATSB, nor did it attempt to find out (or at least explain in the report) WTF the ATS was (not) doing with the speed. Where's the throttle position chart? What was the purpose of disengaging the ATS (apart from "that's what Boeing said to do"? Would that have actually achieved anything given the PF increased thrust anyway? Did the ATS try to pull the power back? Is pussy-footing around with the thrust when in the shaker really a big issue in the 747?

So many questions, so few answers...
Capn Bloggs is online now  
Old 31st Mar 2019, 05:31
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: australia
Age: 74
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The cause could just as probably been having a crusty old Captain counting the days till retirement , teamed with a permanent F/O , simples ! ��
blow.n.gasket is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2019, 05:34
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 342
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
Surprised no one has posted a picture of a burnt out EK 777 with the attached caption "Fly Qantas for safety"..
TimmyTee is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2019, 06:42
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,290
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
So many questions, so few answers...
Yes, the ATSB report seems a little thin on details.

1. A hard speed was put in the FMC. That speed was too slow for the HOLD they were eventually cleared for.
2. The monitoring of the HOLD entry and ALT capture was deficient.
3. The recovery from the low speed condition was not initially effective.

Why? There were three very experienced pilots onboard, so why indeed?

The only good to come from all this mud slinging is everyone here will be more vigilant in future when entering holding patterns. Not because they’re scared of the boss, because they don’t want to suffer the wrath of PPRuNe!
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2019, 09:48
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: overthere
Posts: 3,040
Received 26 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by TimmyTee
Surprised no one has posted a picture of a burnt out EK 777 with the attached caption "Fly Qantas for safety"..
That is unfair. Only the FO of that aeroplane was QF .The Capt was EK .
donpizmeov is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2019, 23:32
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Melbourne
Age: 68
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, good on you TimmyTee. See my previous post. Like to see you say that face to face with the F/O involved.
Miserable troll.
George Glass is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2019, 04:41
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 342
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
Errr, it was a tongue in cheek crack at a certain well known “secretive” fb group who did just that last week (with an attached photo of a burnt out EK 777)..?
TimmyTee is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2019, 06:04
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Melbourne
Age: 68
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, Tim. If that is the case I apologise. Just getting a bit tired of the crap on some of these threads. Especially when you know people involved. The internet needs a shakeup. I think I’ll give it a rest for a while.
George Glass is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2019, 05:03
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 340
Received 53 Likes on 26 Posts
There is precisely ZERO evidence of this, it is a figment of anti-QF propaganda. The A380 cost more than $100m to repair too... if the 747 cost that much, a new one at the time was between $200-300M so obviously economic to repair rather than replace.
AerialPerspective is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2019, 05:06
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 340
Received 53 Likes on 26 Posts
Couldn't be sold??? How many ex QF 747-400s have been sold... one of them was donated to HARS... the aeroplanes are not saleable generally now other than as freighters so the assertion that it couldn't be sold is irrelevant. Many of it's sister ships were broken up/scrapped as well.
AerialPerspective is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.