Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

QF A380 Engine Fire

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th May 2017, 14:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
QF A380 Engine Fire

A MELBOURNE-bound Qantas flight has avoided midair disaster after one of its engines caught fire nearly two hours after taking off.

Australian Transport Safety Bureau spokesman Michael Walker confirmed the Qantas flight was forced to land.

WERE YOU ON THE PLANE? Email [email protected]

“We have been notified of a Qantas flight that took off from Los Angeles and experienced severe engine troubles and was forced to return to Los Angeles International Airport,” he said.

A passenger, who asked to remain anonymous, told the Sunday Herald Sun the “engine blew up in flames two hours into the flight”.

“The plane was then turned back and landed safely but multiple fire trucks were lining the runway when we landed,” the passenger said.
Metro man is offline  
Old 20th May 2017, 14:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isnt it about time Rolls Royce came clean on the A380 Engine...before a major incident with loss of life..
Goddamnslacker is offline  
Old 20th May 2017, 15:02
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Hampshire
Age: 76
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are Rolls Royce maintaining these engines? I am sure they didn't design spurious fires into the engine so I suppose problems with them now are maintenance related?
KelvinD is offline  
Old 20th May 2017, 17:46
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai - sand land.
Age: 55
Posts: 2,831
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am so glad that here at EK we are now getting RR powered 380s
White Knight is offline  
Old 20th May 2017, 18:45
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 340
Received 53 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Metro man
A MELBOURNE-bound Qantas flight has avoided midair disaster after one of its engines caught fire nearly two hours after taking off.

Australian Transport Safety Bureau spokesman Michael Walker confirmed the Qantas flight was forced to land.

WERE YOU ON THE PLANE? Email [email protected]

“We have been notified of a Qantas flight that took off from Los Angeles and experienced severe engine troubles and was forced to return to Los Angeles International Airport,” he said.

A passenger, who asked to remain anonymous, told the Sunday Herald Sun the “engine blew up in flames two hours into the flight”.

“The plane was then turned back and landed safely but multiple fire trucks were lining the runway when we landed,” the passenger said.
"engine blew up in flames two hours into the flight” - Oh P L E A S E... when will the media stop quoting the ravings of idiots who know nothing about what they are talking about... turbulence or some minor engine fault (not saying this was minor but will wait for the F A C T S and not trust the first flush of a media frenzy) is always accompanied by hordes of passengers wailing and carrying on about how "it was sooo scary and we thought we were going to die... etc.".
My guess, happy to be proven wrong, is that this was probably a small failure followed by an engine shutdown and air turnback.
I am so sick of media reports of 'near disasters' that turn out to be routine. Let's see what the experts say.

Last edited by tail wheel; 21st May 2017 at 21:21.
AerialPerspective is offline  
Old 20th May 2017, 18:52
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,904
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Well as long as it remained a contained engine failure....

Happy to see that they did not elect to continue the flight (yeah I know different type and circumstances but still having a gripe about that 3 engines BA 747 flight).
atakacs is offline  
Old 20th May 2017, 23:02
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: NZ
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am so sick of media reports of 'near disasters' that turn out to be routine. Let's see what the experts say.

yes,lets wait and see, has Geoff Thomas commented on it yet?
cflier is offline  
Old 20th May 2017, 23:09
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The local
Posts: 113
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AerialPerspective
"engine blew up in flames two hours into the flight” - Oh P L E A S E... when will the media stop quoting the ravings of idiots who know nothing about what they are talking about... turbulence or some minor engine fault (not saying this was minor but will wait for the F A C T S and not trust the first flush of a media frenzy) is always accompanied by hordes of passengers wailing and carrying on about how "it was sooo scary and we thought we were going to die... etc.".
My guess, happy to be proven wrong, is that this was probably a small failure followed by an engine shutdown and air turnback.
I am so sick of media reports of 'near disasters' that turn out to be routine. Let's see what the experts say.
Completely agree! Any media take note! Cause every time I hear about an aviation incident on the 'news' it is littered with inaccurate facts and total rubbish.

On a side note, I have seen a photo and talked with a crew member. Standard engine failure and a job well done by the crew.

I look forward to hearing what the 'avaiation expert' has to say 😂
ChaseIt is offline  
Old 20th May 2017, 23:31
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 3,206
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts
"Standard" engine failure...?
We're not talking about 1930's radials are we?
Nothing standard about an engine failure with a modern high bypass turbine engine.
B2N2 is offline  
Old 20th May 2017, 23:48
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,551
Received 73 Likes on 42 Posts
WERE YOU ON THE PLANE? Email [email protected]
What's the story with that, Metroman? You on a spotters retainer?

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Bloggsie

Try it - there seems to be something wrong with that email address??

I wonder why?

Tail Wheel
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 21st May 2017, 00:36
  #11 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,481
Received 100 Likes on 57 Posts
Originally Posted by atakacs
Happy to see that they did not elect to continue the flight (yeah I know different type and circumstances but still having a gripe about that 3 engines BA 747 flight).
Reminds me of an OA 747 that left SIN & was the subject of a bomb threat (I know, not engine related). They initially turned back but decided to continue on to MEL. Upon arrival, the Crew demanded a full security check which had to be conducted out on the taxi way!
Buster Hyman is online now  
Old 21st May 2017, 01:05
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 68
Posts: 365
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
It really does fall into the 'so what' category. Engines fail or are shut down for all sorts of reasons. And on a four engined aircraft, it really isn't a big deal. But, going by the gibberish in the newspapers, you'd think the sky had fallen.
mrdeux is offline  
Old 21st May 2017, 01:19
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Goddamnslacker
Isnt it about time Rolls Royce came clean on the A380 Engine...before a major incident with loss of life..
Are Qantas just unlucky, or do they seem to have more incidents with their A380 engines than other carriers?

Where do they get these maintained btw? The Philippines?
p.j.m is offline  
Old 21st May 2017, 01:32
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 68
Posts: 365
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by p.j.m
Are Qantas just unlucky, or do they seem to have more incidents with their A380 engines than other carriers?
I expect that 'seem' is the operative word.
mrdeux is offline  
Old 21st May 2017, 01:47
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Where I hang my hat.
Posts: 186
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mrdeux
I expect that 'seem' is the operative word.
Another Rolls Royce that 'failed to proceed' ??
Matt48 is offline  
Old 21st May 2017, 04:30
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 340
Received 53 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by ChaseIt
Completely agree! Any media take note! Cause every time I hear about an aviation incident on the 'news' it is littered with inaccurate facts and total rubbish.

On a side note, I have seen a photo and talked with a crew member. Standard engine failure and a job well done by the crew.

I look forward to hearing what the 'avaiation expert' has to say 😂
Chase It, haha, I logged on to pprune this morning and thought exactly the same thing. I wonder if the 'world's greatest aviation expert' has got in on the act yet.
AerialPerspective is offline  
Old 21st May 2017, 04:34
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 340
Received 53 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by p.j.m
Are Qantas just unlucky, or do they seem to have more incidents with their A380 engines than other carriers?

Where do they get these maintained btw? The Philippines?
Painting is done in the Philippines... A380 engines are maintained by Rolls-Royce. Before there's screams of why isn't it done here in Australia, let's just remember there are some of us who've been around long enough to remember UA did maintenance on Qantas' 747s in the early 70s until QF had enough aircraft to justify the expenditure.
AerialPerspective is offline  
Old 21st May 2017, 06:48
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: All over the Planet
Posts: 868
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Didn't Aer Lingus also do a fair bit of maintenance on QF’s Classics in the late 1980s/early 1990s?
Ken Borough is offline  
Old 21st May 2017, 08:20
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,904
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by p.j.m
Are Qantas just unlucky, or do they seem to have more incidents with their A380 engines than other carriers?

Where do they get these maintained btw? The Philippines?
It would indeed seem that way.

I'm pretty sure that there are very few maintenance outfits for those Trents (anyone with specifics?) and that quality standards are enforced. As such the apparent issues at Qantas are puzzling.

Last edited by atakacs; 21st May 2017 at 12:06.
atakacs is offline  
Old 21st May 2017, 08:34
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,991
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
It's

QANTAS
ACMS is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.