Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Rex incident YSSY

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Mar 2017, 06:17
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 2,213
Received 69 Likes on 36 Posts
Top marks to the REX flight crew.

ABC news are reporting a man on on the flight deck advised ATC of the problem!
Stationair8 is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 06:34
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 80
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Capt and first officer pay will now be docked until the full cost of the missing propeller can be recovered.
aussie1234 is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 07:10
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,274
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
good job on the crew and lucky it was the RH prop too...

15 pax barely pays the bills methinks..
TBM-Legend is online now  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 07:20
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Counseling immediately after a trauma has been shown to lead to poor mental health outcomes.

Now back to the incident.

How come the propeller and environs went under he wing, rather than shearing the wing or going over it with possible damage to the frame or tail?
garpal gumnut is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 07:26
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Outback
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A spokesman for the Civil Aviation Safety Authority confirmed that the plane's right-hand propeller "came dislodged" about 10 nautical miles from Sydney Airport, and the plane declared a PAN emergency before it proceeded on to land safely.

Twin-engine planes can land safely on one propeller.
The wheels are a better option.
Rod Con is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 07:32
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by garpal gumnut
How come the propeller and environs went under he wing, rather than shearing the wing or going over it with possible damage to the frame or tail?
May have been poetic license, but the TV news showed it going over the wing and almost impacting the tail.






p.j.m is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 07:47
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 380
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great to hear there was a safe landing. Good job.
Willie Nelson is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 08:14
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SEQ
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the SMH -

"Distraught passengers....offered counseling...."

Was there more to it than a successful single engine (prop) landing?
Delta kilo is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 08:36
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gods Country
Age: 53
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote from news.com.au Rex aircraft propeller fell off mid flight: Plane forced to land at Sydney airport


"Grahame Hutchison, an aviation photographer, snapped pictures of the stricken plane at Sydney Airport as it was towed from the terminal after its passengers disembarked.
He told news.com.au the pilots should be commended for staying calm under pressure.
“I would imagine for the passengers it would be a fairly frightening experience so hats off to pilots, they’ve done a great job.”
He said it was rare to see such damage.
“That’s the first time I’ve seen an aircraft with one propeller."

This guy needs to get out more often! LOL
Lancair70 is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 08:37
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne
Age: 83
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Freed of the burden of dragging the aircraft through the air the propellor probably accelerated ahead of the a/c in a graceful descending arc. Not unknown with previous propellor separations.
lamax is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 08:52
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just hate it when a prop falls off. It means you're gonna be late again.

No doubt gonna be some serious engineering investigation there, and some awkward questions asked about the last engine inspection.
onetrack is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 08:53
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,509
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Via Delta kilo:"Distraught passengers....offered counseling...."

Was there more to it than a successful single engine (prop) landing?
I think "offered counselling" is what's done for any event nowadays.

I'd reckon that fire ball King Air prang a few weeks back were probably fresh in the mind of many pax.




.
Flying Binghi is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 08:56
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: In my Swag
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by onetrack
I just hate it when a prop falls off. It means you're gonna be late again.

No doubt gonna be some serious engineering investigation there, and some awkward questions asked about the last engine inspection.
Yes onetrack, my thoughts go out to the maintenance crew.
Their sphincters would be working overtime.
Eddie Dean is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 08:59
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That makes much sense.
garpal gumnut is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 09:14
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Up The 116E, Stbd Turn at 32S...:-)
Age: 82
Posts: 3,096
Received 45 Likes on 20 Posts
I saw the remains of the US Navy P-3 at Cocos that shed a prop.....unfortunately, it did not follow said 'graceful descending arc'.

Instead, it went thru the fuselage and impacted fatally with a crew member sitting adjacent to it.

The aircraft subsequently ditched into the lagoon.....for another 'associated' reason.

Thread drift....back to REX...
(Sic'em Rex)
Ex FSO GRIFFO is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 09:23
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 555
Received 79 Likes on 38 Posts
US Navy P-3? If you're going to go off topic Griffo, get it right please. RAAF P3, A9-754, resulting in the tragic death of FLGOFF Tom Henniker.

Last edited by Cloudee; 17th Mar 2017 at 09:42.
Cloudee is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 09:28
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,980
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
Maybe a bit lucky it didn't come through the cabin too ...
Arm out the window is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 09:30
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: dans un cercle dont le centre est eveywhere et circumfernce n'est nulle part
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They normally go outwards and forward by my experience.
Frank Arouet is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 09:36
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Sydney
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ex FSO GRIFFO
I saw the remains of the US Navy P-3 at Cocos that shed a prop.....unfortunately, it did not follow said 'graceful descending arc'.

Instead, it went thru the fuselage and impacted fatally with a crew member sitting adjacent to it.

The aircraft subsequently ditched into the lagoon.....for another 'associated' reason.

Thread drift....back to REX...
(Sic'em Rex)
US NAVY! Get your facts right.

It was a RAAF P3-C.

And it wasn't the prop leaving the aircraft that caused it to crash, it was a distinct lack of leading edges rendering the aircraft unflyable. Totally unrelated to propellor issues.

When the aircraft ditched, with all four props producing 100% thrust, they impacted the water/reef. All four props departed up and right. Unfortunately No 2 impacted the fuselage after departing and killed the crewmember who happened to be in his ditching station where the prop breached the fuselage.

If you don't have any idea what happened Griffo then don't comment. Unless you're a journo now, in which case just make up whatever you like.
IsDon is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 09:36
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Blue Yonder
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Below screenshot from FR24 playback just as they leveled off at 8000 - the liveatc audio seems to suggest the prop separated around here somewhere (controller asks would they like to maintain 8000 or continue descent).




Also... this AD would seem to be relevant? https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/FR...nt-detail.html and http://services.casa.gov.au/airworth...t7/CT7-006.pdf
duncan_g is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.