Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

'Bull****' NOTAMs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Mar 2017, 22:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'Bull****' NOTAMs

Here's looking at you, CASA:

The problem of Bull**** Notams ? International Ops 2017
QDMQDMQDM is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2017, 23:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Can only agree. It has been raised at the RAPACs, but no progress to date.
cogwheel is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 02:56
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here here!

PG
Popgun is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 03:50
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 642
Received 19 Likes on 5 Posts
If I'm 5nm from the ARP at 150' AGL, then I have more things to worry about than a crane without a red light...

ruprecht
ruprecht is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2017, 09:46
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
No CAA/ANSP/Airport dare not put everything they can in a NOTAM. If there is an incident the legal bottom feeders will tear the place apart looking for any loophole they can use to blame someone - anyone - except their client.

It's all about our legal systems - you try using the defence "Oh Milud, I didn't think it was essential information"
Mr Approach is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2017, 00:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's all about our legal systems - you try using the defence "Oh Milud, I didn't think it was essential information"
So our NOTAM's are unworkable for the same reasons our regulations are unreadable? And yet for the most pedantic and box ticking nation on the planet, we still have this strange risk appetite where we are happy for high capacity RPT aircraft to fight it out with lighties in a CTAF. Very strange...
Falling Leaf is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2017, 02:52
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ruprecht
If I'm 5nm from the ARP at 150' AGL, then I have more things to worry about than a crane without a red light...

ruprecht
Ass-covering gone mad
Really... a tree...

OBST TREE 58FT AMSL
PSN 386M FM THR RWY 25 AND 183M LEFT OF RWY 25 CL
BRG 047 MAG 0.91NM FM ARP
FROM 01 310536 TO 03 300500 EST
got_wheel is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2017, 05:46
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The issue is the requirement to report and in many cases mark "obstacles" that penetrate the Obstacle Limitation Surfaces around the aerodrome. See MOS Part 139 and ICAO Annex 14. This is international practice.
Vag277 is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2017, 06:15
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: inner suburbia
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Typical lazy pilots., : couldn't be bothered to do a 3D plot of 52 cranes every time they get a YSSY location briefing.
It's only 1 NOTAM out of 37 (or 133 if you include the Head Office crud)


To be slightly fair, YSSY does have helicopters and there are 3 cranes between 620' and 830' AGL.
Biggles_in_Oz is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2017, 06:45
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Popgun
Here here!

PG
Hear hear, actually
david1300 is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2017, 09:54
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: At the buffet
Age: 49
Posts: 88
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
My personal favourite is the "trigger notam" cross-referencing to yet another unfindable / unreadable pile of nonsense.
Just tell us what matters to an "Airman"; today and leave the grand plan, 12 month projection crap out of NOTAMS.
Pastor of Muppets is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2017, 10:18
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Melb Vic
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
All of this so true, I imagine a world of technology and wonder (ozrunways/avplan/anything but airservices/casa))where we can quickly read a Notam and weather briefing without having to nut it out and do a slow-ass flight plan every time. 2017 and we still cant embrace all the tech.
Andy_G is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2017, 11:51
  #13 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 421 Likes on 222 Posts
Originally Posted by Pastor of Muppets
My personal favourite is the "trigger notam" cross-referencing to yet another unfindable / unreadable pile of nonsense.
Just tell us what matters to an "Airman"; today and leave the grand plan, 12 month projection crap out of NOTAMS.
I totally agree. The last thing any crew is going to be able to do when checking NOTAMs before departure is to magic up a way to access cross-referenced documents in various other publications. Especially when the departure point is not anywhere near base ops, or even any other operations centre.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2017, 06:25
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: I prefer to remain north of a direct line BNE-ADL
Age: 48
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 10 Posts
So who is going to go and see the Pastor at the Bulla Uniting church in Melbourne and tell him to replace the damn obstacle light on his spire?! It's been NOTAMED for at least 7 years....
Angle of Attack is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2017, 06:32
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Sydney
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Angle of Attack
So who is going to go and see the Pastor at the Bulla Uniting church in Melbourne and tell him to replace the damn obstacle light on his spire?! It's been NOTAMED for at least 7 years....
And guess what, in all of that time not one aircraft has actually run into the thing.

Call it devine intervention maybe. More likely it never needed a light on it in the first place, and therefore never needed a NOTAM to tell us the bloody thing isn't working.
IsDon is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2017, 08:18
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Lost in Space
Posts: 275
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by IsDon
And guess what, in all of that time not one aircraft has actually run into the thing.

Call it devine intervention maybe. More likely it never needed a light on it in the first place, and therefore never needed a NOTAM to tell us the bloody thing isn't working.
And also highlights a latent failure in ANY of the systems, to mandate the light be repaired and therefore removing the NOTAM.
I'll bet it has something to do with a dispute of a "red light" on a church.....
What ever the light is perceived to represent, the church has possibly upheld its right to odject for the last seven years.
7. Interesting number that.
t_cas is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2017, 15:44
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the Three Wise Men had become distracted by a Red Light while attempting to follow the Star So Bright, imagine the mess we would be in today!

Or maybe the pastor is a Sting fan... "You don't need to put on the red light..."
Derfred is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2017, 20:29
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oz
Posts: 306
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The trees are bigger around that church.
I'm surprised there is no notam about the ice-cream/coffee van that sits in the car park to the north of runway 16 in YMML. It comes in handy as " features readily identifiable with the runway end" (on the centreline and to the left of the red light that you won't see on the church).
clark y is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2017, 11:00
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: YMML
Posts: 1,838
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
I think the church was auctioned off about 6 years ago....
le Pingouin is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2017, 02:36
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When looking at cranes or other obstructions, we only issued a NOTAM if there was a conflict, nothing advisory such as noted in the posts above.
(ie, if it does not have a light, you do not NOTAM the procedure, you remove the crane until compliant, that usually gets their attention) If the crane is in the way, it is in the way, light or not.

The NOTAM includes the corrective action, mostly either shutting down the procedure for a timeframe, or modifying the DA. Typically, we did not include the reason, just the outcome.
underfire is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.