Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

QF 7879 routes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Jan 2017, 04:52
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: australia
Age: 74
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does that mean they will also ban commuters who drive 3-4hrs in traffic prior to sign-on too?
Which would be less fatiguing , the having a snooze whilst paxing to work or the long self drive to work ?
blow.n.gasket is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2017, 05:10
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sincity
Posts: 1,195
Received 33 Likes on 17 Posts
Yes! All employees must reside within Cumberland parish!
maggot is online now  
Old 9th Jan 2017, 05:13
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,071
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
Does that mean they will also ban commuters who drive 3-4hrs in traffic prior to sign-on too? Which would be less fatiguing , the having a snooze whilst paxing to work or the long self drive to work ?
Exactly.

You could live in the Margaret River and drive to work yet someone else could live in Adelaide and that's not allowed. Could be interesting if they try to enforce it as I would assume the same would apply for all the USA flying.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2017, 05:28
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: with the other ex-CX pond scum (a zoologist was once head of Flight Ops)
Posts: 1,852
Received 50 Likes on 21 Posts
It's going that way elsewhere. My outfit has published 'guidelines' regarding being 'rested for duty' to get them off the hook should an incident occur and the lawyers start asking awkward questions about whether the crew members were adequately rested. These guidelines include not more than 1 1/2 hours travel time from the airport.

So now we have commuters having to put themselves up in crappy, noisy hotels within 90 mins of the airports, and some of us having to stand our various iterations of Reserve duty in these joints.

Maybe it's not quite such a big consideration for domestic flights.
Captain Dart is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2017, 06:00
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,468
Received 310 Likes on 116 Posts
Does that mean they pay accordingly to live within 90mins?
morno is online now  
Old 9th Jan 2017, 06:22
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: with the other ex-CX pond scum (a zoologist was once head of Flight Ops)
Posts: 1,852
Received 50 Likes on 21 Posts
Depends which airport! I make these points only because some airlines and perhaps regulators are becoming increasingly aware of protecting themselves from legal action regarding crew rest.

As an aside, I heard of a flight attendant who had a car accident driving home from a redeye flight, and the insurer would not pay out: 'not fit to drive' they said.
Captain Dart is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2017, 19:09
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: A dozen towns ago
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perth based, east cost domiciled
Not going to happen. Watch this space......
Pretty sure the horse has bolted with this, been told it's already happening on other (current) types
caneworm is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2017, 22:18
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: International
Age: 76
Posts: 1,394
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I am surprised we have not heard from Keg as he is PER based but resides in the SYD area.
B772 is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2017, 22:39
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sincity
Posts: 1,195
Received 33 Likes on 17 Posts
Fwiw there is a policy on this in place (for now)
maggot is online now  
Old 9th Jan 2017, 22:42
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: S33E151
Posts: 1,086
Received 59 Likes on 29 Posts
I am surprised we have not heard from Keg as he is PER based but resides in the SYD area.
Your question answers itself
V-Jet is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2017, 00:57
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mexico
Posts: 99
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
Fwiw there is a policy on this in place (for now)
.
So what's the policy? Ignore what's happening?
Qanchor is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2017, 01:03
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sincity
Posts: 1,195
Received 33 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Qanchor
.
So what's the policy? Ignore what's happening?
Onus on the individual to be responsible

Which is what most people want, self responsibility, innit? (In general terms)
maggot is online now  
Old 10th Jan 2017, 01:29
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mexico
Posts: 99
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
So would paxing on the last flight of the day to the other side of the country, then hanging around the terminal to operate boc to where they came from earlier fall into the category of "self responsibility"? In general terms?
Qanchor is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2017, 01:32
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 642
Received 19 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by maggot
Onus on the individual to be responsible

Which is what most people want, self responsibility, innit? (In general terms)
For alt-paxing, this is just the company attempting to avoid scrutiny in the event of a fatigue related incident, while saving money in accommodation and allowances.

"He ticked the box saying he wasn't fatigued, so he clearly wasn't fatigued."
ruprecht is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2017, 02:11
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NDB
Age: 53
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My guess will be that the rules introduced for commuting for ULR operations will be very similar to the acclimatisation rules airlines like EK et all use presently for that sort of operations.
OnceBitten is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2017, 02:20
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sincity
Posts: 1,195
Received 33 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by ruprecht
For alt-paxing, this is just the company attempting to avoid scrutiny in the event of a fatigue related incident, while saving money in accommodation and allowances.

"He ticked the box saying he wasn't fatigued, so he clearly wasn't fatigued."
Yeah well I dunno
Just saying how it is currently but that was before perth base ULR was in mind, more for paxing down on day of departure before where one may not have gotten sleep otherwise. Not too many have a sleep before operating the qf1 in the evening do they
maggot is online now  
Old 10th Jan 2017, 02:41
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 356
Received 115 Likes on 46 Posts
For alt-paxing, this is just the company attempting to avoid scrutiny in the event of a fatigue related incident, while saving money in accommodation and allowances.
It's not actually. There has been a significant amount of discussion within the group that looks at fatigue related issues amongst line pilots and it is still recognised that there is a joint responsibility to ensure a pilot arrives at work as rested and as fit as possible. This discussion has included looking at how other airlines manage commuting, including driving to work.

Alternate Paxing is just one part of the discussion; the main focus is on pilots being really fit to operate, no matter how they arrive at sign-on, whether its a 4 hour or 12 hour domestic day or a MEL-LAX or PER-LHR.

Last edited by C441; 10th Jan 2017 at 04:16.
C441 is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2017, 03:40
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 380
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rog approved said:

You may find the new FRMS will make it extremely difficult to commute then operate on the same day.
Serious question: Since the CASA announcement about another twelve month delay and are QF still going ahead with the FRMS?
Willie Nelson is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2017, 04:18
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 356
Received 115 Likes on 46 Posts
Serious question: Since the CASA announcement about another twelve month delay and are QF still going ahead with the FRMS?
Yes. Despite the delay, it remains a requirement for Qantas and other operators to introduce an FRMS in the designated timeframe.
C441 is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2017, 07:18
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Garden
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given one operator has the definition as flight deck duty starting with park brake release for pushback one has to wonder how the FRMS can be taken seriously.

Multiple airlines flying around the country with different definitions of flight deck duty ie one at park brake release another at sign on ...
watermellon is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.