SingCargo Pod/Wing/Tailstrike at YMML today?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SingCargo Pod/Wing/Tailstrike at YMML today?
This is the only info that I've seen about this.
Anyone able to share the result of the runway inspection, i.e. did it happen, or was there no evidence of it?
https://au.news.yahoo.com/vic/a/3284...tar-mac/#page1
Anyone able to share the result of the runway inspection, i.e. did it happen, or was there no evidence of it?
https://au.news.yahoo.com/vic/a/3284...tar-mac/#page1
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Mel
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I missed it
But I heard about it
Yes the runway was closed for an inspection
And the plane didn't return
I also heard there were empty baggage containers doing about 80km/h on rwy34 with car 2 and 3 in hot pursuit
But I heard about it
Yes the runway was closed for an inspection
And the plane didn't return
I also heard there were empty baggage containers doing about 80km/h on rwy34 with car 2 and 3 in hot pursuit
here was the container with car 2 trapping it against the fence on operations rd
Also the last aircraft do depart prior to the closure was SIA238, a pax flight not a cargo flight
Also the last aircraft do depart prior to the closure was SIA238, a pax flight not a cargo flight
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Down under
Age: 54
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That was some hell of a wind.
did you see the QF plane do some serious crabbing at YMML ?
(Stolen from Facebook)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/542515...posted-public/
did you see the QF plane do some serious crabbing at YMML ?
(Stolen from Facebook)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/542515...posted-public/
Singapore Airlines tail strike suspected as Melbourne airport lashed
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/busi...92cc8ee4ed11d1
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/busi...92cc8ee4ed11d1
That was some hell of a wind.
did you see the QF plane do some serious crabbing at YMML ?
(Stolen from Facebook)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/542515...posted-public/
did you see the QF plane do some serious crabbing at YMML ?
(Stolen from Facebook)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/542515...posted-public/
I managed to persuade the Australian to let me read it sans subscription - just google the story and follow that link instead of clicking on the one above. I think you get 1 or 2 freebies a day from them. Not much more than already disclosed, except that ATC saw what they thought was a tailstrike and notified the aircraft. Pilots were unaware and decided to press on to Singapore, being of the opinion that the aircraft sensors would have picked up if the strike had occurred. Runway closed to check for damage/debris but none found.
Quote:
SQ now admits skid made contact. A/c now in SIN for repair
Where did you read that?
SQ now admits skid made contact. A/c now in SIN for repair
Where did you read that?
Response from SQ on facebook page .....we understand that the inspections confirmed there had been contact with the tail skid system, but there was no contact with the fuselage. The affected component is being repaired and the aircraft is expected to return to service by tomorrow. Thank you".
https://www.facebook.com/AIRLINESECRETS/
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Heaven on Earth
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Boeing 777 QRH states as follows.
Tail strike message ( Eicas message ) is not shown :
Continue to operate normally. Fuselage contact without activation of the tail strike message indicates structural integrity is intact. The aircraft can pressurize normally.
They continued in accordance with laid down procedures, but of course the tail strike should not have happened in the first place... It was not a courageous decision..but an expected decision... maybe they could have explained in clearer terms to atc so as not to be perceived as reckless...
Tail strike message ( Eicas message ) is not shown :
Continue to operate normally. Fuselage contact without activation of the tail strike message indicates structural integrity is intact. The aircraft can pressurize normally.
They continued in accordance with laid down procedures, but of course the tail strike should not have happened in the first place... It was not a courageous decision..but an expected decision... maybe they could have explained in clearer terms to atc so as not to be perceived as reckless...
Last edited by millionaire; 11th Oct 2016 at 04:52. Reason: typo
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Harbour Master Place
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
but of course the tail strike should not have happened in the first place...
Lets wait for the report. Nobody goes to work to have an incident or accident, perhaps we all may be able to learn something when the facts are eventually revealed.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Look up and wave
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I tell you what. If ATC says there was sparks and smoke and the tail contacted the runway, I don't care what QRH says, I'd be returning to land weather permitting at the departure point or a suitable alternate with engineering support.
The safest thing to do is to get it on the ground and inspected. If you continued and something was amiss constituting some form or emergency, the first question the investigators and company will ask, is why didn't you return to land....
Coupled with the recent wing BBQ and not punching the slides out I wonder what is going on. Yes both events went their way, but what if it didn't?
The safest thing to do is to get it on the ground and inspected. If you continued and something was amiss constituting some form or emergency, the first question the investigators and company will ask, is why didn't you return to land....
Coupled with the recent wing BBQ and not punching the slides out I wonder what is going on. Yes both events went their way, but what if it didn't?