Qantas Recruitment
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: australia
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This came up in the RIN and it came up in the past, specifically thinking early 2000’s. While I haven’t read up on this lately my understanding is you can’t be forced between awards especially in the case where you will be worse off.
Which specific clause do you think allows for assignments to the 737 from LH? This hasn’t been allowed in the past so when and what has changed to EBA9 to allow this?
20.1.1 ( the word is “ allocated” which means award or assign) and 16.4 is the administration of it.
17.4 is modified by 20.1.2 so that you can work out what is a promotion and what is a demotion, also what is a bid down. Eg An A380 Captain can bid down to B 737 captain vacancy provided he/ she meets the criteria but a young buck A330 F/O can’t bid to B737 F/O without company agreement.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: australia
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i can’t see the words” mutual consent” anywhere in the relevant sections. You obviously don’t appreciate the significance of the word “ allocation”.
I haven’t asked because it doesn’t affect me. “Your” manager wouldn’t know anyway.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: australia
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I ask you this then, why didn’t the company use it to assign to PER 737 when they were clearly short in the last allocation? I know of pilots who were informed they didn’t have enough F/O’s for PER 737 so they missed out on a command.
If it doesn’t affect you, then why did you bring it up? To try stir or troll people? Assigning to the 737 has never been used so what makes you think it will be used now?
As far as understanding what allocation means, I certainly do and if legislation overrides its meaning, it’s irrelevant.
If it doesn’t affect you, then why did you bring it up? To try stir or troll people? Assigning to the 737 has never been used so what makes you think it will be used now?
As far as understanding what allocation means, I certainly do and if legislation overrides its meaning, it’s irrelevant.
if you you look back, this direction of the thread started when the question of DE f/os came up as being necessary, in some posters opinion.
ok . Which legislation specifically?
Displacement across awards ( incidentally, they are agreements) is not possible because it is not covered in section 20. Allocations, including assignments is.
Does anyone know for a fact if Qantas, Qlink, JQ and VA direct entry are requiring student records of CPL exam pass marks and attempts?
I know they did this in the past, just wondering if bad CPL KDR's and multiple attempts are used in the application process.
The VA cadetship used to ask for them.
Thanks guys
I know they did this in the past, just wondering if bad CPL KDR's and multiple attempts are used in the application process.
The VA cadetship used to ask for them.
Thanks guys
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: FLs
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The summary includes all written and flight tests results, as for how much consideration is placed in that report, not sure.
How on earth is that relevant?
Or is it only required for CPL holders?
Or is it only required for CPL holders?
Nope, everyone Morno. Fastidious about it too.
I recall QF/ and link requiring it back in '08. As for the consideration placed, I've heard of people recently being asked why they failed *insert exam here* twice etc. during the interview.
I recall QF/ and link requiring it back in '08. As for the consideration placed, I've heard of people recently being asked why they failed *insert exam here* twice etc. during the interview.
Last edited by romeocharlie; 26th Jul 2018 at 23:06. Reason: Additional info.
Presumably they don't want "strugglers". Fail an exam or two, no worries, but have a history of multiple failures and bare minimum passes then you might be seen as a training risk.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: australia
Age: 74
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: everywhere at once
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is not the case anymore. For the 2016 QF intake, if you held an ATPL you did not require the results advice. At any rate what they require will be listed on the "minimum requirements" list they send prior to the interview date. I wouldn't stress about it.
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Straya
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SO Interview Process
G’day All,
Just got an invite for an SO interview.
Has anyone been through the process recently and can throw some light on what the day involves?
What to bone up on, what not to, etc.
Appreciate any and all insights.
Just got an invite for an SO interview.
Has anyone been through the process recently and can throw some light on what the day involves?
What to bone up on, what not to, etc.
Appreciate any and all insights.
I was in the 2016, held an ATPL and mine still got checked, as did another internal's recently. Having said that, as you've written - if they want it, it'll be on the list. I would work on the principal of having it and not needing it, but that's just me. Good luck!
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: everywhere at once
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just tried to pm you mate but it wont let me send the message as your inbox is full. Delete a few messages and I'll send you some info.
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any news as to what stage internal/external interviews are at?