Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas Recruitment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Jun 2018, 23:16
  #1661 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anybody heard anything after the last round of Psycho testing?
Strutter is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2018, 09:59
  #1662 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Strutter - I'm still waiting to hear after doing the psycho testing as an external applicant. Confidence is low though, found the testing pretty tricky! Good luck!
betterluckythangood is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2018, 22:35
  #1663 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: On the water
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by DirectAnywhere
If if you haven’t applied yet though - sounds like you haven’t - you might be waiting a while from here. They’ve just really started processing another 500 applicants after rejecting another few hundred.
500 went to psychometric testing? Out of all the people I know that applied this round, ranging from TP FO's through to Jet captains, only one person got through to psychometric testing, most got the "Your application is not progressing for the the Second Officer role, but other companies in the group are interested and will be in touch" email.
WannaBeBiggles is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2018, 00:08
  #1664 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Darwin
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Welcome to ‘recruit to group’. Funnily enough I haven’t heard of a single internal NOT getting an interview. Things are certainly changing for the better within the QANTAS group and they are realising looking after the employees they already have and offering career progression will pay dividends long term.
High_To_Low is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2018, 00:55
  #1665 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
‘Pay dividends’? Depends on what outcome you are seeking as to whether you view the dividend being paid as a good thing or not. I’m all for offering a pathway for those within the group but if the result of that is a more capable pilot misses out from externally and we take someone less capable (but still ‘suitable’) internally then that’s may not be the best outcome for mainline in the long term.
Keg is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2018, 01:00
  #1666 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Darwin
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Hi Keg

I 100% agree with you but as we all know it was the other way around for the last couple decades where it was an ‘unwritten rule’ that if you wanted to join QF go to Rex, if you wanted VA join Qlink. Imagine how many good guys they missed out on from the internals due to this policy. Works both ways.....
High_To_Low is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2018, 01:13
  #1667 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: FLXXX
Posts: 166
Received 19 Likes on 10 Posts
Isn’t that where QF will ‘train’ the less capable pilot to the appropriate standard?

At the moment capability isn’t helping employ you, it’s whether you tick all the HR focused boxes. Many a capable pilot have been turned down to not demonstrating a HR focused response in the interview.
AviatoR21 is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2018, 01:21
  #1668 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by betterluckythangood
Hey Strutter - I'm still waiting to hear after doing the psycho testing as an external applicant. Confidence is low though, found the testing pretty tricky! Good luck!
Yes, you and I both found it pretty tricky! Goodluck!
Strutter is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2018, 02:05
  #1669 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Asia
Age: 42
Posts: 127
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The dark arts should be an ATPL subject ;-)
Gligg is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2018, 06:16
  #1670 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Keg
‘Pay dividends’? Depends on what outcome you are seeking as to whether you view the dividend being paid as a good thing or not. I’m all for offering a pathway for those within the group but if the result of that is a more capable pilot misses out from externally and we take someone less capable (but still ‘suitable’) internally then that’s may not be the best outcome for mainline in the long term.
There is an implied assumption here that HR-controlled pilot recruitment at QF mainline hires the most capable candidate.

Once upon a time perhaps....but I think most of us can see that this is not necessarily or consistently the case in these days of HR mumbo jumbo!

PG
Popgun is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2018, 18:47
  #1671 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere on the Australian Coast
Posts: 1,091
Received 164 Likes on 36 Posts
WannabeBiggles, Keg will have a better idea of the numbers, but the word was that in the applications that closed recently there were roughly 800 applicants to mainline of whom some 300 were deemed uncompetitive at the application stage for whatever reason, leaving 500 for stage two.
DirectAnywhere is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2018, 09:13
  #1672 (permalink)  
34R
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brisbane
Age: 52
Posts: 238
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Popgun
There is an implied assumption here that HR-controlled pilot recruitment at QF mainline hires the most capable candidate.

Once upon a time perhaps....but I think most of us can see that this is not necessarily or consistently the case in these days of HR mumbo jumbo!

PG
I would suggest in the history of pilot recruitment, NEVER could it be said that consistently are the most capable candidates hired.

Are you are implying that beacause some great guys and girls are missing out because of HR oddities, that somehow those that are successful are, by virtue of the fact that HR have liked them, not able to be considered as competent?

Those that have been successful to date put their application in early, realised they would have to play the game to progress and prepared themselves as best they could to make it so. Some went through, some didn’t.

Qantas, along with every other airline and even the ADF have been guilty of overlooking some tremendously capable people over the journey, while at the same time allowing some people you wouldn’t perhaps place in the same category to slip through. This isn’t a new development.

34R is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2018, 03:57
  #1673 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,926
Received 391 Likes on 206 Posts
Qantas, along with every other airline and even the ADF have been guilty of overlooking some tremendously capable people over the journey
One does wonder what they look for in a candidate, three folks received rejections recently having 7k hours, single pilot IMC in the most challenging conditions to be found in Oz. Over qualified, or a fear that they would have to unlearn many ingrained habits?
megan is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2018, 05:20
  #1674 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: everywhere at once
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by megan
One does wonder what they look for in a candidate, three folks received rejections recently having 7k hours, single pilot IMC in the most challenging conditions to be found in Oz. Over qualified, or a fear that they would have to unlearn many ingrained habits?
It has been said elsewhere on this thread that experience doesn't count for anything with QF. This is absolutely true for the assessment day stage. However assuming the aforementioned rejection letters are being received prior to psychometric testing, it looks as though they're looking for resumes indicating previous jet airliner experience this time round, only because there's so many expat candidates from Asia and the Middle East with that sort of experience. There's guys and girls with a lot less time than 7000hrs being called up for testing but I think you'll find they have wide body jet FO or SO experience.
Max-Diff is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2018, 05:57
  #1675 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: elsewhere
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE. There's guys and girls with a lot less time than 7000hrs being called up for testing but I think you'll find they have wide body jet FO or SO experience.[/QUOTE]

Yep. I know of a few who went to Cathay 2 years ago with 300 hours total time. 18 months as a SO and now getting into mainline. Meanwhile the 7000 hour regional turboprop captains aren’t given the opportunity to sit aptitude testing. Makes you wonder.
Flyboy1987 is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2018, 08:15
  #1676 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Vietnam
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I want to know how these CX SO's who only stayed for 2 years are getting out of their bond.
pilotchute is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2018, 08:22
  #1677 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Lower North Shore
Posts: 276
Received 22 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by pilotchute
I want to know how these CX SO's who only stayed for 2 years are getting out of their bond.
absolutely no integrity
Brakerider is online now  
Old 1st Jul 2018, 09:23
  #1678 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sydney
Age: 60
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brakerider


absolutely no integrity
The S/Os or CX?
Tankengine is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2018, 16:41
  #1679 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do they hire from Europe?
yunebug is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2018, 22:51
  #1680 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Vietnam
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
In the example given the SO joined CX with 300TT so defiantly no ATPL.. Non ATPL holders are actually required to stay for 5 years, not 3.
pilotchute is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.