Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas Recruitment

Old 28th Mar 2017, 17:39
  #721 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Lower North Shore
Posts: 276
Received 22 Likes on 10 Posts
For what it's worth, my details also got lost in the transition. Sent an email 2 weeks ago letting them know I couldn't log in, and couldn't complete the video interview as they had asked- no reply.
Brakerider is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2017, 21:45
  #722 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 9 Posts
Thanks Keg. Will do.
stillcallozhome is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2017, 22:18
  #723 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: over there
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For those worried they are unable to login to the new recruitment system, I'm in the same boat. I emailed them this morning and got the following response within a couple of hours:

Thanks for your email.

We are still working through applications and I can confirm yours is still under review at this time. We will be looking to invite you to an upcoming assessment day in the coming months.

Any updates regarding your application will come directly to this email address and not via the system.
billyraycirrus is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2017, 00:41
  #724 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Sydney
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well Im glad Im not the only one with this new recruitment system problem then. Keg Ill send an email to the address you provided and hope IT and HR can work together to resolve.
pblak is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2017, 01:32
  #725 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: on your living room ceiling
Posts: 172
Received 12 Likes on 3 Posts
Just got the same response as above. Took less than an hour
SpyderPig is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2017, 07:51
  #726 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Dubai
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old mate just did the same and got told no thanks
EY_Airbus is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2017, 08:57
  #727 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Up North
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I enquired today as I too was unable to log into Workday with my Taleo details.

received the:
Thanks for your email.

We are still working through applications and I can confirm yours is still under review at this time. We will be looking to invite you to an upcoming assessment day in the coming months.

Any updates regarding your application will come directly to this email address and not via the system.

Took under an hour for the reply.

I applied on the last day, and was contacted the next day for psychometrics and online interview.
Online interview on the second day, and all psychometrics on the 3rd/last day allowed.
Received the xmas email and nothing else until I enquired this morning.
Though I was out of the race!!
Spooled Up is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2017, 07:01
  #728 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: adelaide south australia
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To answer some of the speculation..

May 02 is start date for both A330 and the first 787 course of DE SO's.

Congrats to all who are getting the good news! Good luck to all still waiting.
SonofCoco is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2017, 07:23
  #729 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm assuming under the EBA this would then mean all new hires on subsequent courses will be on the 787 fleet.
amateur is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2017, 07:48
  #730 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ˙ǝqɐq ǝɯ ʇ,uıɐ ʇɐɥʇ 'sɔıʇɐqoɹǝɐ ɹoɟ uʍop ǝpısdn ǝɯɐu ɹıǝɥʇ ʇnd ǝɯos
Age: 45
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by amateur
I'm assuming under the EBA this would then mean all new hires on subsequent courses will be on the 787 fleet.
I don't think that that's necessarily true.
FRQ Charlie Bravo is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2017, 08:00
  #731 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought that to address the problem with the 'first day lottery' all new hires would be directed to the 787 which would become the entry level fleet? Unless of course circumstances necessitated otherwise and the unions agreed. I could be completely wrong though...
amateur is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2017, 11:08
  #732 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 616
Received 151 Likes on 47 Posts
amateur, you are quite correct. The specific wording says:
unless agreed otherwise with the Association for operational reasons. The Association will not unreasonably withhold agreement.
I would expect that in this case they have Association approval.

There is not enough sim space available to train 2 courses a month on the 787 and more crew are still required on the A330 to back-fill what is expected to be significant training movement off the 330 in the new training year.

Forcing Qantas not to employ onto the A330 would have the undesired effect of preventing other crew from getting promoted as there would be no one to fill their previous position and disadvantage new joiners by delaying their employment.

Additionally, the only crew who would be theoretically disadvantaged would be new 787 S/O's who would be more senior to later joining 330 S/O's. However, for the first 18 months in the company Qantas can ignore seniority and allocate a pilot to whatever aircraft they like. So there can be no disadvantaged party for the first 18 months after the 787 starts flying.

This is just my assumption mind you.
Beer Baron is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2017, 13:46
  #733 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How is QF supposed to fill A330 vacancies if they can't recruit onto it?
Derfred is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2017, 22:41
  #734 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 642
Received 19 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Derfred
How is QF supposed to fill A330 vacancies if they can't recruit onto it?
747-400 RIN?
ruprecht is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2017, 23:26
  #735 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Expect a handful of direct entry to the 400.
goodonyamate is online now  
Old 31st Mar 2017, 00:19
  #736 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sydney
Age: 60
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by goodonyamate
Expect a handful of direct entry to the 400.
I would think some 330 SOs would move to 400 if needed and be replaced by direct entry on 330.
Tankengine is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2017, 00:20
  #737 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: adelaide south australia
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had heard the DESO 744 rumour..I would jump at the chance to fly the 747!

Not that I'm so choosy..
SonofCoco is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2017, 00:52
  #738 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sincity
Posts: 1,195
Received 33 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by SonofCoco
I had heard the DESO 744 rumour..I would jump at the chance to fly the 747!

Not that I'm so choosy..
Exotic santiago!
maggot is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2017, 04:18
  #739 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere on the Australian Coast
Posts: 1,091
Received 164 Likes on 36 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derfred
How is QF supposed to fill A330 vacancies if they can't recruit onto it?
747-400 RIN?
Yeah, we're overdue for a 747 S/O RIN given that we've just retrained 10 or SOs onto the 747; the same pilots who were RIN'd to the 330 18 months ago. Oh, and let's not mention the dozen or so FOs pulled off the 330 to replace the FOs RINed off the 747 unnecessarily, who then also had to be replaced, costing the company millions. Don't start the APU too early though. Dickheads.
DirectAnywhere is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2017, 06:29
  #740 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
I did hear one line of thought that all RIN costs were put down under the 'transformation' bucket of money. Therefore not a direct cost to Flight Ops. That would at least explain some of the RIN lunacy. I can list 3 A330 Captains and 1 737 Captain straight up who had less than a dozen landings post training as F/Os on the A380 after being RIN'd off the 767- less than 6 months. I can think of another two who would have had only a year on the A380 as F/Os before retraining on the A330.

Such a waste.
Keg is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.