Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas Recruitment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Aug 2022, 04:57
  #2941 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: AU
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Purely a TAF. If your eta is 1200z. Confirm you take account weather 1130-1230?
On Guard is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2022, 05:48
  #2942 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 42
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Depends the nature of the weather. If it is removing an operational requiremnt ( ie holding fuel or alternate), it ceases 30 min after the end of its time frame ( ie if the bad weather stopped at 0200, the requirement is there until 0230).

If it is creating an operational requirement ( ie the weather was good but will soon turn to ****), the requirement comes in 30 min before its forecast time. For example if there was a FM 0200 of bad weather below alternate minima, the requirement is applicable and must be accounted for from 0130.

However, consider an example when the weather was below alternate minima and your ETA at the AD is 0210z, however a FM period from 0200z lifted the weather above the alternate minima. Since it is removing an operational requirement, the buffer period pushes this requirement out until 0230z. However, you dont need to plan an alternate even though weather is below minima, you just need holding fuel until the requirement is removed, ie 20 min.
mmm345 is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2022, 06:36
  #2943 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: AU
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by mmm345
Depends the nature of the weather. If it is removing an operational requiremnt ( ie holding fuel or alternate), it ceases 30 min after the end of its time frame ( ie if the bad weather stopped at 0200, the requirement is there until 0230).

If it is creating an operational requirement ( ie the weather was good but will soon turn to ****), the requirement comes in 30 min before its forecast time. For example if there was a FM 0200 of bad weather below alternate minima, the requirement is applicable and must be accounted for from 0130.

However, consider an example when the weather was below alternate minima and your ETA at the AD is 0210z, however a FM period from 0200z lifted the weather above the alternate minima. Since it is removing an operational requirement, the buffer period pushes this requirement out until 0230z. However, you dont need to plan an alternate even though weather is below minima, you just need holding fuel until the requirement is removed, ie 20 min.
Thanks. So yes it looks like weather buffers are now 30/30. I thought they used to be 60/60? So if your eta is 1200 and FM 1245 creates an op requirement then we don’t need to take this into account.

Also so the same FM in a TAF3, how does this work? My reading says that the eta buffer is -30 and +60 and if the taf3 has no wx in this period then no alt required?

Thanks in advance.
On Guard is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2022, 06:46
  #2944 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 42
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by On Guard
Thanks. So yes it looks like weather buffers are now 30/30. I thought they used to be 60/60? So if your eta is 1200 and FM 1245 creates an op requirement then we don’t need to take this into account.

Also so the same FM in a TAF3, how does this work? My reading says that the eta buffer is -30 and +60 and if the taf3 has no wx in this period then no alt required?

Thanks in advance.
Yes if your ETA was 1200 and the FM was from 1245 it would be no factor,

The reference material for TAF3 is ENR 1.1-73.

Basically if the AD has a TAF3 the first 3 hours of the TAF are treated differently. Any PROB forecast of visibility reductions below the alternate minimima or the PROB presence of TS doesnt require holding or ALT fuel ( however there normal presence absent of any PROB still requires alternate/holding). Additionally the 30 min buffers for FM BCMG are not applicable. So if there is a FM02z of bad weather and your ETA is 0159z, you legally dont require holding/alternate ( if you are still in the first 3 hours of the TAF3 validity)
mmm345 is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2022, 07:02
  #2945 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: AU
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by mmm345
Yes if your ETA was 1200 and the FM was from 1245 it would be no factor,

The reference material for TAF3 is ENR 1.1-73.

Basically if the AD has a TAF3 the first 3 hours of the TAF are treated differently. Any PROB forecast of visibility reductions below the alternate minimima or the PROB presence of TS doesnt require holding or ALT fuel ( however there normal presence absent of any PROB still requires alternate/holding). Additionally the 30 min buffers for FM BCMG are not applicable. So if there is a FM02z of bad weather and your ETA is 0159z, you legally dont require holding/alternate ( if you are still in the first 3 hours of the TAF3 validity)
ok great. And the last thing confusing me is from p121 MOS section 4.05. It says the estimated time of use of a destination is eta +\- 30 mins. So back to my original example, my eta is 1200, then the time of use is 1130-1230. So then I think a FM at 1245 would apply, it would have to be 1301 to not apply?

Thoughts?
On Guard is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2022, 07:14
  #2946 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 42
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by On Guard
ok great. And the last thing confusing me is from p121 MOS section 4.05. It says the estimated time of use of a destination is eta +\- 30 mins. So back to my original example, my eta is 1200, then the time of use is 1130-1230. So then I think a FM at 1245 would apply, it would have to be 1301 to not apply?

Thoughts?
Im not too familiar with the P121 notion of estimated time of use sorry, maybe someone with more familiarity might have a better idea of its signficance.
mmm345 is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2022, 03:08
  #2947 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: FLXXX
Posts: 166
Received 19 Likes on 10 Posts
If you want a job with Qantas make sure you know how to read and decipher a TAF3.
AviatoR21 is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2022, 04:22
  #2948 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: AU
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by AviatoR21
If you want a job with Qantas make sure you know how to read and decipher a TAF3.
Thanks. TTF was in place last I was in aus hence getting my head around this. Can you confirm essentially TAF3 is a TTF, valid for 3 hrs from issue, reissued every 3 hrs. Buffers do not apply in the taf3 period and was it prob 30 and 40 ignored?

thanks
On Guard is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2022, 04:29
  #2949 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Lower North Shore
Posts: 276
Received 22 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by On Guard
Thanks. TTF was in place last I was in aus hence getting my head around this. Can you confirm essentially TAF3 is a TTF, valid for 3 hrs from issue, reissued every 3 hrs. Buffers do not apply in the taf3 period and was it prob 30 and 40 ignored?

thanks
no disrespect man but this isn’t the bob tait forum…maybe go confirm by opening the AIP like everyone else
Brakerider is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2022, 04:29
  #2950 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Anvya
Posts: 138
Received 47 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by AviatoR21
If you want a job with Qantas make sure you know how to read and decipher a TAF3.
Qantas recruiter reading this will know everyone knows their TAF3 requirements. What fuel would you carry if your arriving 5 mins after alternate requirement is lifted at planning stage ?
KAPAC is online now  
Old 15th Aug 2022, 04:52
  #2951 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Weltschmerz-By-The-Sea, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,364
Received 77 Likes on 34 Posts
That’s easy. Flight plan fuel plus one hour, same as always. 😎
Australopithecus is online now  
Old 15th Aug 2022, 06:20
  #2952 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: AU
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Brakerider
no disrespect man but this isn’t the bob tait forum…maybe go confirm by opening the AIP like everyone else
I have, and p121MOS s4 which I mention above. As usual it is clear as mud hence my asking here.
On Guard is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2022, 06:46
  #2953 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 303
Received 75 Likes on 30 Posts
Ooo that’s a tough one. Alternate plus 1.0 for AD?
cloudsurfng is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2022, 11:01
  #2954 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: FLXXX
Posts: 166
Received 19 Likes on 10 Posts
I was being sarcastic fellas! How does a discussion on TAF3’s have anything to do with Qantas recruitment….
AviatoR21 is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2022, 12:33
  #2955 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: AU
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by AviatoR21
I was being sarcastic fellas! How does a discussion on TAF3’s have anything to do with Qantas recruitment….
It’s an interview question
On Guard is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2022, 02:13
  #2956 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 566
Received 309 Likes on 107 Posts
If you are unsure of an interview question just tell them you’ll study while you spend 4+ years on hold after spending a couple of grand on getting a Qantas medical just to be on the hold…
aussieflyboy is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2022, 02:38
  #2957 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 395
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
I've got a question about alternates...

Oh oops...wrong page...disregard.

Whilst I'm here though, anyone know what bases are likely? I'm assuming 330s will be the prime type in the immediate future?
HappyBandit is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2022, 09:20
  #2958 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 108
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by HappyBandit
Whilst I'm here though, anyone know what bases are likely? I'm assuming 330s will be the prime type in the immediate future?
Last I heard approximately 80% going to 330 due to 787 training pipeline being a little full.

330 only has Syd and Bne as SO bases. Traditionally everyone has been hired into Sydney then bidded to transfer to Brissy. But just prior to the US flying, all Sydney SO’s that wanted Brissy got it.

So I guess in the foreseeable future it will just depend on what base needs numbers and if anyone is bidding for the other. Sydney would be most likely, at a guess, due to the larger amount of flying (and new destinations coming) and possibility of Brisbane losing flying.
Sparrows. is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2022, 10:30
  #2959 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,285
Received 350 Likes on 190 Posts
Plus with the amount of recruitment mooted over the next few years it won’t be too long before a transfer to your favoured locale is available.
dr dre is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2022, 14:43
  #2960 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sparrows.
Last I heard approximately 80% going to 330 due to 787 training pipeline being a little full.

330 only has Syd and Bne as SO bases. Traditionally everyone has been hired into Sydney then bidded to transfer to Brissy. But just prior to the US flying, all Sydney SO’s that wanted Brissy got it.

So I guess in the foreseeable future it will just depend on what base needs numbers and if anyone is bidding for the other. Sydney would be most likely, at a guess, due to the larger amount of flying (and new destinations coming) and possibility of Brisbane losing flying.
Do you have any idea how they select the allocations? If you live in Perth already would you be more likely to be offered 787 than 330?
ruddegar is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.