Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Cobham sign 10 year extension for B717 Operation

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Cobham sign 10 year extension for B717 Operation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Jul 2016, 16:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Melbourne
Age: 53
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up Cobham sign 10 year extension for B717 Operation

Just saw the media release, 10 year extension on QF B717 contract starting 1 January 2017
Pindan warrior is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2016, 05:10
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,273
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Worth, I believe some $900M....
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2016, 05:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,785
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
So, how old will the 717s be in 2027??
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2016, 06:38
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Queensland
Posts: 97
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just found a few on FR24. NXM is 14 years old, NXH and NXG are both 16 according to the site.
LostProperty is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2016, 07:03
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 796
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
https://www.planespotters.net/produc...urrent&sort=ln

Oldest is 16, youngest is 10.
Going Nowhere is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2016, 22:39
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: C9-H6-N2-O2
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone know when Sunstate/Easterns are getting the C-Series?
Toluene Diisocyanate is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2016, 23:27
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Out of interest - why would Qantas outsource this? why not use Qantas pilots & crew?
billykid is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2016, 00:01
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Perth
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
Does anyone know when Sunstate/Easterns are getting the C-Series?
Probably not within the next 10years.
F.Nose is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2016, 02:37
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sydney
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Out of interest - why would Qantas outsource this? why not use Qantas pilots & crew?
$$$$ and leverage.
Capt disillusioned is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2016, 03:25
  #10 (permalink)  
VC9
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems that a lot of Cobham pilots were hoping that Qantas would take the B717 operation in house. Since the announcement I have only heard expressions of disappointment, no excitement. There appear to be fears that the bid was so low that Qantas could not refuse and that conditions can only go downhill.
VC9 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2016, 03:33
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: flyville
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most of the disappointment stems from another 10 years of Cobham disfunctional out of touch management.
R.Cruizo is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2016, 04:07
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 796
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
I wouldn't expect much out of the company in the next EBA negotiation. The 'efficiencies' that Cobham committed to have to come from somewhere.
Going Nowhere is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2016, 05:51
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: perth australia
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From an engineering view the news has been widely accepted as very good news. 600 jobs dependant on this contract and to secure most of them for 10 years surely can't be seen as anything other than good news.
Not sure what the job situation for pilots and airline positions in Australia is but its dire from an engineers point of view. Admittedly it comes at a cost of lowering conditions but have a look around everywhere and it's a common theme
bella3 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2016, 11:33
  #14 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It seems that a lot of Cobham pilots were hoping that Qantas would take the B717 operation in house.
I wonder if that was in the belief that there'd be a 50% + pay increase and, don't get too excited, REAL staff travel?
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2016, 11:39
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: home
Posts: 516
Received 21 Likes on 9 Posts
In 10 years the oldest 717 will still be younger than the youngest nutwork F100 is today, so that's good
airdualbleedfault is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2016, 20:24
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Horn Island
Posts: 1,044
Received 33 Likes on 8 Posts
I wonder if that was in the belief that there'd be a 50% + pay increase and, don't get too excited, REAL staff travel?
No I think your way off the mark CC. I'm sure some had those ambitious hopes though.
RENURPP is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2016, 00:34
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Sand dune
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My phone has been running hot since they announced the 10 year deal and despite the obvious and very large upside, no one appears happy. They very much wanted to have been taken in house to some degree by now.

Out of the numerous telephone calls I have had since the announcement, a couple of themes have become clear. Almost every employee wanted to see an end to the Cobham managers, and not one of them wanted to earn more or receive additional perks as a result of being in housed.

We are bracing ourselves for yet another round of efficiency demands, and just in time for EBA talks to begin around years end.

The question on everyone's lips now is: how low did Cobham go to secure this and how much is it going to cost me?
Blitzkrieger is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2016, 04:28
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: down south
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It doesn't have to cost the crew anything. They must stand firm. The deal made is between the company and Qantas, not the crew and Qantas.
If you stand firm it might mean the company walks away from it and you get what you wanted anyway.
RU/16 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2016, 07:09
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: asylum
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you'll find that the night freight operation is funding a large portion of the "savings"!
Half Baked is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2016, 07:44
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Where they send me
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blitzkreiger, I joined NJS in 1995 and for the next 12 years there were constant talks/rumours about the operation being taken in-house by QF, just as there were always those (like someone called Flying White Rat) who were predicting the demise of the Qantaslink operation (by NJS). Yet it continues, the operation, the rumours, the hopes and the same management. Just bear in mind that you will always find idiot/incompetent/self-serving management wherever you go. I have what I consider the best job there is in aviation yet I suffer what could be described as the most incompetent management on this planet. It is always a compromise. As useless as they were and apparently continue to be, your management have organised another 10 years of secure employment. When/if pressure is put on your terms and conditions then you have options/choices, not always good ones but choices all the same. And never believe that it can't get any worse!
Knocked Forward is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.