Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Driverless pushback tugs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jun 2016, 22:52
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"... at least 7 years"

Try 17. I was using them in 1999.
1977 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2016, 23:20
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Winmalee NSW
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just for (my) interest
When are engine normally started, during pushback or after pushback? Does that vary with aircraft size?
I noticed that the first engine was started during pushback (B738) and I think that I remember that when flying internationally (larger aircraft) that the first engine doesn't usually get started until after pushback. Once again is this to reduce 'turn around time' - surely not.

Lastly I found (by accident) a video clip on YouTube of a person walking past a running jet engine (on a civilian aircraft) and being sucked into the engine. Is that a beat up or has it actually happened as I would imagine that the engines were just idling. I know it has happened onboard aircraft carriers when engines are run up to full before takeoff and there are personnel close to the aircraft.
jparnold is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2016, 07:53
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Bubble
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I was flying domestic when JQ started to use driverless tugs. I was led to believe then that it was due to cost, partially due to the operator did not have to be an engineer. Was that correct or have things changed?
It's only Qantas these days using engineers on headsets.. *generally*.

It may be a false economy at Qantas as there is enough ramp staff around to drive a pushback tug so I'm not sure implementing them would be a cost saving. A greenfield operation where everything was starting from scratch it may be worthwhile like Jetstar and Virgin. In Qantas I can imagine it causing a few IR issues.
600ft-lb is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2016, 08:17
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Harbour Master Place
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jparnold, it's no urban legand, the threat is serious and real: Preventing
Engine Ingestion Injuries When Working Near Airplanes
CurtainTwitcher is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2016, 08:23
  #25 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
When are engine normally started, during pushback or after pushback? Does that vary with aircraft size?
It varies with airport requirements. Some allow an engine start on push, other airports have restrictions. Sometimes this is gate specific at the airport too.

Depending on aircraft weight and strength of the tug sometimes an engineer may request you hold the start and N til completion of the push or for 4 engined aircraft no more than two started on push with remainder on completion of the push.
Keg is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2016, 11:43
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,887
Likes: 0
Received 247 Likes on 107 Posts
I have been in military and airline aviation for forty years and have always used 'port' and 'starboard' where possible.
Why would I care "what you have always used"?

Show me an AFM, AOM, ACM AMM or anything from the last twenty years in Australian aviation that uses port and starboard and not left and right.

Port is always port. Starboard is always starboard. But left and right can depend which way you are facing.
No, the left wing, left nav light and left main wheel remain so regardless of my orientation. (not that orientation)

Gawd, the level of knowledge in the aviation community has sunk to all time lows.
I am well aware of the history but see above. Nice pun though.
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2016, 14:04
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
Geez Iccy, you need to take a chill pill! Getting a bit stroppy in your old age, methinks...
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2016, 21:43
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Winmalee NSW
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What have I started
jparnold is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2016, 07:03
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,951
Received 395 Likes on 210 Posts
Show me an AFM, AOM, ACM AMM or anything from the last twenty years in Australian aviation that uses port and starboard and not left and right
The US and UK authorities use the terms port/starboard, haven't checked Oz. Don't know about Boeing manuals, but the company certainly uses the terms in various articles it produces. The TCDS of various aircraft use the terms, and require placards in those terms ie fuel selector, port tank/starboard tank.
megan is online now  
Old 27th Jun 2016, 07:22
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: with the other ex-CX pond scum (a zoologist was once head of Flight Ops)
Posts: 1,853
Received 51 Likes on 22 Posts
OK, you just keep using 'left' and 'right' in your 'plane', Iccy!
Captain Dart is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2016, 21:19
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ward 8
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
20 years ++
AU-501 is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2016, 13:11
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cabin crew getting their aircraft left and right muddled?

Cabin crew state which side of the aircraft they are on every time they pick up the phone. "Left 2, Tracey". They even do this from the remarkably difficult orientation of rear facing jump seats. I find it pretty hard to believe any cabin crew anywhere in the world would confuse the left and right side of the aircraft.

However, I'd be guessing that a percentage of them would have a bit of trouble with port and starboard.
Derfred is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2016, 01:07
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a company that makes a motorized front gear with internal and external controls. The ac can be backed out with a ground remote, then can taxi using the electric motor rather than the engines.

Seems like a pretty good idea, and it really doesnt weigh much, not sure why it isnt widely used, especially for freighters like FedEx.

"Together with a powerful team of partners Lufthansa Technik successfully tested a new way of ground operations: electric motors installed on an Airbus A320 aircraft was subject to close scrutiny during one week. For the first time ever electric motors were installed on the main landing gear of a commercial aircraft taking over all necessary movements of an aircraft on ground. L-3 Communications, Fraport, as well as Lufthansa German Airlines and Lufthansa Technik, with Airbus support, teamed up to jointly test the technology demonstrator which might lead to a new way for aircraft to taxi."

https://youtu.be/puJ7DaXu0K8
underfire is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2016, 01:40
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Melbourne
Age: 60
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
(Very) old humour

Port, Starboard, Left, Right...

It's simple:

Port is Left.

If there are two sides to an aircraft and Port is one of them; that means there is only one side left.

Starboard is left.



DIVOSH!
Di_Vosh is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2016, 03:46
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's plenty of port... Right there in the bottle!
Derfred is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2016, 11:26
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: with the other ex-CX pond scum (a zoologist was once head of Flight Ops)
Posts: 1,853
Received 51 Likes on 22 Posts
'There's some red port left'. That also covers the nav light.
Captain Dart is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2016, 13:09
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,951
Received 395 Likes on 210 Posts
There's plenty of port... Right there in the bottle!
But do you know the etiquette of passing the port?
megan is online now  
Old 1st Jul 2016, 04:20
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 81
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts
Doesn't get passed me.

Once I get it I keep it!
Chris2303 is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2016, 04:23
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
Doesn't get passed me.
Too much port there!
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2016, 06:05
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: australia
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I seem to remember some time back (at Sydney) that the crew requested the ground staff to commence push back and that nothing happened - to them at least. However the aircraft several bays away (that was boarding at the time) started to move back. It took a fairly short time to realise that the remotes were mixed up. Unfortunately there was some damage to the forward pax door on the pushed back aircraft -plus lots of red faces.
Correct me if I am wrong.
roger6 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.