Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Aircraft crew deploys emergency slide by accident

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Aircraft crew deploys emergency slide by accident

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th May 2016, 02:10
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Harbour Master Place
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CASA 2010 Jetstar Special fatigue audit, sober reading. Has anything changed?

(Jetstar Culture: Toughen Up Princesses!)

Last edited by CurtainTwitcher; 29th May 2016 at 02:26.
CurtainTwitcher is offline  
Old 29th May 2016, 02:53
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,253
Received 195 Likes on 90 Posts
Disregard Madam Butterflies Undone framer as he/she has no idea. The Flight Ops safety department is entirely separate from Flight Ops Management and they conduct their own investigation. One of the ticks in the box with the current CP is that she has been involved with airline safety investigation from both the union end and the operational end at the mother ship. The rosters will be looked at with the current focus on FRMS, there is no way CASA are just going to disregard the possibility of fatigue. There is a reason why they have knocked back Jetstar's FRMS twice. As for the CASA special audit, most of the Jetstar management personnel, both flying and non-flying have all been replaced since that report was written and once again why do you think CASA have knocked back the Jetstar FRMS?
Lookleft is offline  
Old 29th May 2016, 04:02
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,878
Likes: 0
Received 246 Likes on 106 Posts
It was not even a normal door.
What was abnormal about the door?
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 29th May 2016, 07:15
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Flight Ops safety department is entirely separate from Flight Ops Management and they conduct their own investigation.
Yes, but investigations are often conducted with most favourable outcomes.

“Confidence and naivety is something you feel and believe before you truly understand the situation”
― Julie E Czerneda
Madame Bandit is offline  
Old 29th May 2016, 09:39
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sydney
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Icarus2001
What was abnormal about the door?
Sorry should of specified it was not a normal door in the sense that it was opened daily and/or touched by crew in any kind of opening capacity other than eps. Similar I suppose to an overwing exit door- it has a guarded handle and the FA would never see that door open or need to go anywhere near the door handle unless in an emergency. This was not a L1 door that is opened and closed several times daily
Croissant2016 is offline  
Old 30th May 2016, 00:49
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,253
Received 195 Likes on 90 Posts
Yes, but investigations are often conducted with most favourable outcomes.
That is an opinion that has been stated about most investigation bodies e.g ATSB,NTSB,TAIC,AAIB,Dutch Safety Board, TSBC etc, etc etc. If the outcome is not what an individual would like to see i.e.total exoneration, then the investigation is accused of being biased and flawed. Sometimes the criticism is deserved but at Jetstar in the present time investigations are conducted independently of flight ops.
Lookleft is offline  
Old 31st May 2016, 09:45
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: OZ
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
I understand said cabin crew was suffering from heavily fatiguing rostering.
Roller Merlin is offline  
Old 31st May 2016, 09:51
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 845
Received 41 Likes on 21 Posts
weird to open any door at posn 2 (OR the doors at posn 3) on an A321 - they are NEVER used normally except in emergency -

one C/C member sits for t/off and landing on a rear facing jump seat at 2R
(in most configs opposite 2 pax seated row 10 11 or 12 depending on density)

Door 2L has no jump seat and has a row of pax seats either 2 or 3

I do not buy fatigue or error stories sorry does not add up - pax do not ever disembark from door 2L - how do you mistake such a major exit ruling

see here
http://www.yssyforum.net/board/showt...hp?t=36&page=9

Last edited by rog747; 31st May 2016 at 10:28.
rog747 is offline  
Old 31st May 2016, 10:02
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
United Airlines flight attendant loses job after activating emergency slide and bailing
wheels_down is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2016, 10:32
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bran Castle
Posts: 218
Received 41 Likes on 14 Posts
I have heard similar, was fatigue. 2 back of the clock followed by an early morning shift. Sounds familiar - computer says you can do it, then why can't you....
romeocharlie is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.