Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Geoffrey Thomas Sinks To New Low

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Geoffrey Thomas Sinks To New Low

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th May 2016, 09:00
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Paradise
Age: 68
Posts: 1,551
Received 50 Likes on 19 Posts
This is pretty typical of training organisations that the airlines outsource to. Most of my knowledge came from pushing the wrong button at the wrong time and either being quickly put in place by a stressed out captain, or by seeing what happens when you're a spectator on a high performance jet. It can get ugly unless you take the right corrective action almost immediately.
Spot on GG; outsourcing and "value priced training" has led to a dearth of appropriate experience at some TRTO's (not all). A type rating accomplished within an airline's own C & T system will usually produce a better result.

While I'm no fan of GT and his self-created credentials, and with my belief he's far from a credible aviation expert and should be labelled as what he is...a journalist, I did feel his comments on Foreign Correspondent were reasonable and not the typical sensationalist speech we've come accustomed to.
I think he deserves a pass this time...
Agreed. Unless I missed something, it was quite a well presented program.
chimbu warrior is offline  
Old 5th May 2016, 04:13
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BNE320,

the reporter kept getting confused between Air Asia Indonesia & Air Asia X.


The former flies OZ to Indo, the later flies KL to OZ & onto AKL.
Incorrect.
Derfred is offline  
Old 5th May 2016, 11:49
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,548
Received 73 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by Chimbu Warrior
Unless I missed something, it was quite a well presented program.
Agree. No problems with GT's performance on that one.

Originally Posted by Derfred
BNE320,
XPT?
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 5th May 2016, 13:07
  #24 (permalink)  
XPT
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: drw
Age: 62
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Derfred
BNE320,



Incorrect.
so what is incorrect then ?
XPT is offline  
Old 5th May 2016, 13:45
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe as real aviation people we should start a petition to all the news outlets saying he should not be referenced or called an aviation expert. We could highlight his stupid comments and contradictions when defending hos favourite airlines....
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 5th May 2016, 15:01
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
For anyone claiming to be an "Expert" or offering their "Expert Opinion" on any given subject always remember this-

An "X" is an unknown quantity and "spurt" is just a drip under pressure!!
aussie027 is offline  
Old 5th May 2016, 22:47
  #27 (permalink)  
XPT
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: drw
Age: 62
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by aussie027
For anyone claiming to be an "Expert" or offering their "Expert Opinion" on any given subject always remember this-

An "X" is an unknown quantity and "spurt" is just a drip under pressure!!
& tell the truth about Qantas's 19 crashes & 65 deaths in those crashes, not hide behind some dodgy movies claims(Rainman).
XPT is offline  
Old 5th May 2016, 23:13
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Queensland
Posts: 97
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
XPT

& tell the truth about Qantas's 19 crashes & 65 deaths in those crashes, not hide behind some dodgy movies claims(Rainman).


Fair go - wasn't the last fatal crash that Qantas had in the early fifties? And if your figures are correct 65 fatalities is hardly mayhem. If I recall correctly at least one of those early crashes resulted from enemy fire during WW2.
LostProperty is offline  
Old 6th May 2016, 00:07
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 56
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pre-jet age accidents don't really have much relevance to current safety standards.
OzSync is online now  
Old 6th May 2016, 00:59
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 616
Received 151 Likes on 47 Posts
tell the truth about Qantas's 19 crashes & 65 deaths in those crashes
Well you can't spell eXPerT without XPT, so please do tell us "the truth" about these crashes and their relevance to anything in the last 50 years??

Last edited by Beer Baron; 6th May 2016 at 01:03. Reason: typo
Beer Baron is online now  
Old 6th May 2016, 04:12
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,393
Received 20 Likes on 6 Posts
Yes XPT, let's see your list. You can include domestic ops in the very early days, PNG ops and losses to enemy action.
Fris B. Fairing is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.