Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Jetstar Aiming for 50% Gender Spilt in Interview Candidates

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Jetstar Aiming for 50% Gender Spilt in Interview Candidates

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Aug 2017, 13:19
  #261 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,298
Received 356 Likes on 195 Posts
The air force can do as they please, but are any airlines currently performing positive gender discrimination? My impression, for the ones that pay for the cost of training at least, will have no desire to employ any substandard pilots that will cause unnecessary costs to their business.
dr dre is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2017, 13:35
  #262 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NSW
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sure it can't hurt being female if you are trying to get into Qantas at the moment.
It is rather sad seeing some less than capable females getting in ahead of some very good male operators.
I'm not at all against female pilots, and flown with some great ones, but have seen some shockers who got the nod from QF. Not all that fair really.
Jetdream is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2017, 23:57
  #263 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
dr dre:
The air force can do as they please, but are any airlines currently performing positive gender discrimination? My impression, for the ones that pay for the cost of training at least, will have no desire to employ any substandard pilots that will cause unnecessary costs to their business.
The social justice warriors will argue that the training standards now required "perpetuate white male privilege".

The standards will be lowered for women "because they have been systematically denied the privileges that allow men to succeed". For the same reason women will get mentored far more than any man and given multiple opportunities to try to pass the (reduced) standards that now apply.

This is very simply organised in a large company by requiring the training group to provide a comprehensive written report justifying why they failed a female candidate, then subjecting that report to independent review, followed by a full blown meeting at just below CEO level with a view to deciding if the fail should be accepted or retesting be required.

After about three of those reviews the training group will get the message, well, at least the new leaders of the training group will know whats expected.

That is apparently what is happening here and overseas.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2017, 01:48
  #264 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oz
Posts: 306
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Positive gender discrimination". Discrimination is discrimination no matter how you spin it.

Is the expression "affirmative action" not in vogue these days.
clark y is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2017, 02:57
  #265 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Joker89
Unfortunately a true statement.

Female Air Force pilots are given opportunities not available to male pilots of same seniority.

Male pilots forced into ground jobs the women don't want.

When female pilots do not make the required standard instructors are told not to fail them.

When male pilots get so fed up with the place and are harassed into a resignation they face reprisals for trying to leave and told they will "never fly again."
Excuse the thread drift, but the RAAF has well and truly let the tail wag the dog WRT the HRC latest efforts. It's creating issues where they are not needed and undoing the good work of years and years of RAAF training methodology and standardisation, all for addressing a gender gap that has been self correcting over time. The bosses are speed bumps in the face of what's coming and the exodus of QFI's and checkies will speak for itself. We all just want to work and commit to getting the job done, and not deal with agendas being driven by external influences. Rant complete
Tazrat737 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 00:54
  #266 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The wrong time zone...
Posts: 843
Received 58 Likes on 23 Posts
From The Age article "Time to 'up the ante' to get more female pilots says Qantas boss Alan Joyce" - selected quotes.
In a bid to lift women pilots in Australia, Qantas boss Alan Joyce has committed to a goal of at least 50 per cent women in its pilot cadet intake in a decade's time.
Qantas will commit to a 20 per cent intake of women in its 2018 cadet program, and double that number over the next decade to reach gender parity, at intake.
"We must work at the grassroots level to encourage girls and women into studies that can lead to a career in aviation," Mr Joyce will say.
"We just need to reinforce the message that girls and women belong in technical jobs."
Never mind that they may not want to be pilots - we're gonna make 'em fly!
josephfeatherweight is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 05:17
  #267 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: australia
Posts: 377
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
https://www.3aw.com.au/tom-elliott-b...-pilot-target/


Good minute and a half rant from Tom Elliott at 3AW here.
mikewil is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 06:37
  #268 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: elsewhere
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is there any place or organisation where we can bring up this issue?

I honestly feel discriminated against because i’m a male.

For Christ sake why can’t individuals be assessed on personal merit?
Flyboy1987 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 08:08
  #269 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The wrong time zone...
Posts: 843
Received 58 Likes on 23 Posts
No, there's no organisation that you can bring this up with.
In the words of Chief of Air Force (2013 - when queried on the legalities of the RAAF's policy on female pilot applicants) - "Positive discrimination is LEGAL."
josephfeatherweight is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 09:35
  #270 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oz
Posts: 306
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In this day and age, it's probably easier to change your gender, get the job and then change it back.
clark y is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 10:35
  #271 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: australia
Posts: 377
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
In this day and age, it's probably easier to change your gender, get the job and then change it back.
HR would be frothing at the mouth at the prospect of employing a transgender pilot. You could probably bypass the psychometric and SIM screening entirely if you were one of these lucky minorities...
mikewil is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 11:23
  #272 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: australia
Posts: 172
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
OMFG,

The whinny white men are out in force again complaining about how they're being discriminated against.

I'd say the female pilots I've flown with, on average, have been of a higher standard than the males.
exfocx is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 11:31
  #273 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The wrong time zone...
Posts: 843
Received 58 Likes on 23 Posts
Good stuff, I'm glad to hear it and have had a similar experience myself with female pilots. But you haven't been reading very closely, exfocx, have you, because this is not an argument about that. This is about people of any gender getting a job based on merit - NOT based on their gender "cause we are going to employ 50% this or that..."
By the way - it's "whiny"...
josephfeatherweight is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 11:41
  #274 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,509
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by exfocx
The whinny white men are out in force again complaining about how they're being discriminated against...
I think they call them Soy Boys...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FTSvLKY7HEk
Flying Binghi is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 12:09
  #275 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The wrong time zone...
Posts: 843
Received 58 Likes on 23 Posts
Nah, you haven't quite gotten the gist of that video - which was pretty funny, thanks for posting.
Soy Boys would actually be the advocates of artificially increasing the percentage representation of female pilots - perhaps like exfocx (unless exfocx IS a "she", in which case she couldn't be a Soy Boy - well, I guess she could, but that's another discussion...)
josephfeatherweight is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 21:26
  #276 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: australia
Posts: 377
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by exfocx
OMFG,

I'd say the female pilots I've flown with, on average, have been of a higher standard than the males.


Irrelevant. This is not about the standards of each gender, this is about artificially inflating the numbers of a particular gender to meet a ridiculous quota thus giving said gender an unfair advantage irrespective of how good they perform as a pilot.
mikewil is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 21:59
  #277 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Coal Face
Posts: 1,295
Received 331 Likes on 125 Posts
Some elements of the report I agree with. Fighter pilots are arrogant. And there were some spelling mistakes as well.
Chronic Snoozer is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 22:10
  #278 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 283
Received 127 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by exfocx
OMFG,

The whinny white men are out in force again complaining about how they're being discriminated against.

I'd say the female pilots I've flown with, on average, have been of a higher standard than the males.
They probably had a higher standard of literacy than you too.
das Uber Soldat is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 23:17
  #279 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: elsewhere
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is having a level playing field where applicants are scored on their performance during assesment day too much to ask?

I’m so sick of this PC crap getting rammed down our throats in Australia.

Last edited by Flyboy1987; 23rd Nov 2017 at 23:18. Reason: Typo
Flyboy1987 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 23:59
  #280 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: australia
Posts: 377
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Flyboy1987
Is having a level playing field where
I’m so sick of this PC crap getting rammed down our throats in Australia.


If you really think about it, it is not politically correct at all. How is discriminating against a gender to meet a quote for the other gender politically correct. Only because it satisfies the feminazis is it seen to be politically correct.


Imagine if the shoe was on the other foot. Could you imagine the outrage if there was a story where despite 90% of nursing graduates being female, a large hospital (or the public health system) committed itself to ensuring that 50% of new hires were male.


The feminazis would be rioting in the streets and setting fire to cars...
mikewil is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.