Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

787 & 777 dual quals at Scoot

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Nov 2015, 22:31
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
787 & 777 dual quals at Scoot

Do the Scoot 777 pilots also fly the 787 or are they single categories?
Spooky 2 is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2015, 23:26
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No idea. There are no Scoot bases in Aus/NZ, so you might want to pose the question on another forum.
RAD_ALT_ALIVE is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2015, 23:34
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the informative reply as I thought Soot was was a Qantas spin-off
Spooky 2 is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2015, 00:15
  #4 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nope, it's an SQ spinoff.
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2015, 00:15
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Scoot is a LCC subsidiary of Singapore Airlines and was set up to tackle the Qantas subsidiary Jetstar (in its many forms). SQ was particularly peaved when JQ Asia was set up based in Singapore.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2015, 02:35
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
Scoot Singapore has now just phased out the 777.

It's an all 787 operation now. Crew didn't operate both either from what I heard.
PoppaJo is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2015, 05:28
  #7 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Isn't the 787 and 777 a dual endorsement?
Keg is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2015, 06:14
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South
Posts: 638
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not in New Zealand. Seperate type ratings so far.

Mind you NZ CAA don't recognise the B737CL and NG as a common type rating so they are not exactly out there!
c100driver is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2015, 13:45
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: PPrune nominee 2011!
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the informative reply as I thought Soot was was a Qantas spin-off
Damn - gotta clean my monitor now!
Skystar320 is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2015, 15:12
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1996
Location: Check with Ops
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't the 787 and 777 a dual endorsement?
It is for many aviation authorities but that does not mean the operators are necessarily taking advantage of the fact. I believe BA and EY were making noises about flying both but I do not know if they've gone through with those plans.
Pontius is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2015, 15:16
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Australia
Age: 53
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EY instructors fly both types with line drivers to follow in the new year.
bangbounceboeing is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2015, 13:47
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: ...second left, past the lights.
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No it is not a "common type endorsement" (B777/787) in Singapore (CAAS) as a few other countries have.
Scoot have you on either on 777 or 787 for ease of bonding you exorbitant amounts (~SG$87,000). No more crew on 777 as all were forced onto 787, now that it's an all 787 fleet (still a couple of 777s hanging around the area). Those who delayed resigning an ADDITIONAL bond went to NokScoot/Bangkok which had big labour law problems (no surprise their!) and is now crew by Thia's.
Happy Landings
Chocks Away is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2015, 15:09
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet Moo Moo
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's a dual licence endorsement in the UK BUT it does require a 5 day differences course and has a minimum flight familiarisation requirement (once every 28 days I think) which would cause initial problems for BA due to the numbers of 787 aircraft.

The advantage of having dual rated pilots is now past from a financial perspective thus I don't see it happening.

Now, 787 and 777X, that's a different argument.
Wirbelsturm is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2015, 20:42
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Show me just one operator that is doing this differences/rating course in 5 days. Boeing did it as a proof of concept, but I can't imagine anyone else trying that?
Spooky 2 is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2015, 17:10
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollister, Hilo, Pago Pago, Norfolk Is., Brisbane, depending which day of the week it is...
Age: 51
Posts: 1,352
Received 31 Likes on 9 Posts
Are any Airbus operators doing the same thing? (And that's with an aircraft that I believe was designed for flight deck commonality.)
MakeItHappenCaptain is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2015, 20:53
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CX with the 330/340 ?
planeloader is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2015, 09:09
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: between supple thighs
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil

Spooky 2, a couple of the airlines in the Middle East that have both are doing the 5 day differences course. Common type rating (like the 757/767) so no legal requirement to fly either within a set period, ATPL recency aside.
sleeve of wizard is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2015, 15:38
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
type rated on the 787 and my license came back with 777 in addition. never been near a 777 so go figure !
bermudatriangle is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2015, 16:33
  #19 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting as I'm sure that was bound to happen. Can't believe any pilot group would put up with a five day conversion but what ever.
Spooky 2 is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2015, 17:34
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: between supple thighs
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

Don't forget that it's not just the pilot group that may have an influence, the local regulatory bodies have the final say as to the required length of course.
5 days is plenty if you put the work in, there are some subtle differences but there is also plenty of commonality.
sleeve of wizard is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.