CASA regulatory review updates
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: dans un cercle dont le centre est eveywhere et circumfernce n'est nulle part
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
QUOTE "Part 61 Solutions Taskforce" QUOTE
Strewth!
There is a problem after all and we are now looking for a solution. Perhaps somebody should have asked before making the bloody law in the first place.
There is a problem after all and we are now looking for a solution. Perhaps somebody should have asked before making the bloody law in the first place.
somebody should have asked before making the bloody law in the first place.
The fact is, Part 61/141/142 as passed bear no relation to the output of the sub-committee that did all the original work.
Part 42 is just as bad, the final "rules" are nothing like the output of the "taskforce" from industry, and now, internally, the push is on in CASA to apply Part 42 to all maintenance, it will be a financially and practically crippling outcome, just like Part 61/141/142.
https://www.casa.gov.au/.../casr-part-64-authorisations-non-licensed-pers...Part 64 of CASR 1998 consolidates the rules governing the licensing of ground operations personnel. It prescribes the privileges and requirements for the grant ...
Fascinating, is CASA going to issue un-licensed person licenses, or maybe non-license license, maybe they are going to be non-person licenses, the mind boggles.
Tootle pip!!
Thread Starter
AHIA will report on task force's development when known
AHIA which took a firm stand against the stalled legislation has been asked to work with CASA (yet again).
Putting aside the past train wreck; AHIA will soon be able to tell you about the leadership and structure of the new group; and hopefully some thoughts on time lines. It is a massive job, involving several thousand pages of CASA advisory and guidance material. Any Part 61 changes will no doubt required legislation now in draft to be checked over.
If you want to be kept up-to-date, then we can include you on our current data online base (just over 4,000 at present).
Your contact info will be totally confidential.
Just ask email: robsrich (at) bigpond (dot) com.
AHIA
Putting aside the past train wreck; AHIA will soon be able to tell you about the leadership and structure of the new group; and hopefully some thoughts on time lines. It is a massive job, involving several thousand pages of CASA advisory and guidance material. Any Part 61 changes will no doubt required legislation now in draft to be checked over.
If you want to be kept up-to-date, then we can include you on our current data online base (just over 4,000 at present).
Your contact info will be totally confidential.
Just ask email: robsrich (at) bigpond (dot) com.
AHIA
Last edited by robsrich; 16th Nov 2015 at 20:31. Reason: typo
Thread Starter
Measuring CASA's performance ─ aviation community survey
Message forwarded from CASA to AHIA (and others).
CASA is listening to the aviation community and we need your help to find out more.
I encourage you to complete our survey, which can be accessed from the homepage of the CASA website, or by visiting:
www.casa.gov.au/MOP
This activity is a key part of CASA’s response to the Aviation Safety Regulation Review, which recommended CASA conduct industry surveys every two years to measure the health of the relationship.
We are keen to find out what you think about your interactions with us and measure our performance over time. In particular, we want to learn more about your experiences in complying with and understanding the regulations, applying for and renewing licences, as well as being audited.
This information will provide a benchmark, so that we know where we have to focus our efforts to strengthen the relationship.
Please forward this email to your colleagues and friends in the aviation community so that their views can also be considered.
Thank you for sharing your views.
Mark Skidmore AM
Chief Executive Officer and Director of Aviation Safety
CASA is listening to the aviation community and we need your help to find out more.
I encourage you to complete our survey, which can be accessed from the homepage of the CASA website, or by visiting:
www.casa.gov.au/MOP
This activity is a key part of CASA’s response to the Aviation Safety Regulation Review, which recommended CASA conduct industry surveys every two years to measure the health of the relationship.
We are keen to find out what you think about your interactions with us and measure our performance over time. In particular, we want to learn more about your experiences in complying with and understanding the regulations, applying for and renewing licences, as well as being audited.
This information will provide a benchmark, so that we know where we have to focus our efforts to strengthen the relationship.
Please forward this email to your colleagues and friends in the aviation community so that their views can also be considered.
Thank you for sharing your views.
Mark Skidmore AM
Chief Executive Officer and Director of Aviation Safety
Fascinating, is CASA going to issue un-licensed person licenses, or maybe non-license license, maybe they are going to be non-person licenses, the mind boggles.
Time to flash this old chestnut up again!!
Is the care taker period still in progress? Apart from decision makers announcing that they are having an extended rest period in relation to the CAO 48.1 implementation, what's the juice on the implementation of the operational CASRs? It's all gone quite, are they snoozing in Fort Fumble?
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Is the care taker period still in progress? Apart from decision makers announcing that they are having an extended rest period in relation to the CAO 48.1 implementation, what's the juice on the implementation of the operational CASRs? It's all gone quite, are they snoozing in Fort Fumble?
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Are you kidding?
Time to flash this old chestnut up again!!
Is the care taker period still in progress? Apart from decision makers announcing that they are having an extended rest period in relation to the CAO 48.1 implementation, what's the juice on the implementation of the operational CASRs? It's all gone quite, are they snoozing in Fort Fumble?
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Is the care taker period still in progress? Apart from decision makers announcing that they are having an extended rest period in relation to the CAO 48.1 implementation, what's the juice on the implementation of the operational CASRs? It's all gone quite, are they snoozing in Fort Fumble?
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Fort Fumble is doing what it does best, actually the only thing for which it is capable, looking busy while making lots of money and squeezing the life out of GA.