Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

QF TO GET 787 !!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Aug 2015, 00:46
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ANA and JAL where the only ones who went 8-across (and the first two operators).

Everyone else - LCC and full service (inc BA, Etihad, United, Air NZ) has gone 9-across.
moa999 is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2015, 01:19
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Qld, Australia
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't usually get too involved in the forums on here as I am a LAME not a pilot. I do find the conversations interesting though, and from time to time (as in now) feel the need to step into the fray.
FBN I have to take issue with your ageist comments regarding QF cabin crew. I fly long haul regularly and would much rather have experienced people controlling the cabin. I mean no disrespect to young FAs but in the event of an unserviceability or god forbid an emergency, there is no substitute for experience. You seem to forget that the primary role of cabin crew is your safety. Serving you and making you comfortable is a secondary role. I have the utmost respect for cabin crew. They and the check in staff are actually the frontline of an airline as far as the passengers are concerned.
Just my two bobs worth
FNQTech is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2015, 02:00
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 796
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
I would have thought that being a FA is primarily a physical job, not an intellectual one
FBN,

I take it from that comment that you've never been on board when any sort of issue/emergency has occurred in the cabin.

There's been several times over my career (and I haven't been around all that long either) where the quick-thinking and professionalism of the Cabin Crew has been the difference between a situation in the cabin ending well/being diffused and it escalating/ending badly.

In those times the age/experience of the Cabin crew has ranged from either ends of the 'age/experience' spectrum.
Going Nowhere is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2015, 06:26
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I had the same opinion regarding cabin crew as FBN, until I became an airline pilot and watch them go through their EPs every year.

It's impressive when you see them switch from pleasant air hostess to shoes off on the seat screaming commands in unison to evacuate the ship. They have far better knowledge of safety equipment than Pilots (most of the time).

Their primary role is safety.

Their secondary role is service.

Something other airlines in the region switch around.
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2015, 07:37
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Melbourne
Age: 48
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a rort it is that you have a B scale contract since 2007 with these guys working more for less money

The Golden Oldies are picking up $120K to $180K , good dollars for biscuit chucking you might think.

What an absurd system that is in the Australian context, protected species from the days of Govt ownership , truly bizarre. Who was the CEO who signed off on this little gem, I bet the bloke was also a gun at things like , ah well selecting aircraft & stuff.

I note the former QF Chief Economist has said a number of times , he thinks QF International cannot be saved.

But what would he know compared to a QF Pilot with his "you beaut" year 12 , or maybe even a BAVn, or the legend above who actually holds would you believe it a BSc.

They say it isn't over until the fat lady sings

Well I say she ain't just singing she HOOOOOWLING >>>>>>>>
Flyboat North is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2015, 07:59
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,432
Received 207 Likes on 69 Posts
^^^^^^^ Oh man, I love your posts, gives me a good chuckle every time I read them. I heard an interesting fact today, the latest Qantas group results are higher than Virgin, Tiger, Singapore Airlines, Air New Zealand and Ethiad's profits combined!! Not to bad for a bloated inefficient company FBN
Ollie Onion is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2015, 08:08
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Sydney
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mods. Please.

As amusing his posts are at times he's clearly a troll.

Despite his recent sin binning he's clearly to stupid to learn his lesson and behave.

I vote for a permanent ban. I'm sick of his nonsense.
IsDon is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2015, 09:43
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: deepest darkest recess of your mind
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard that from Joyce's mouth as well, Ollie. Of course, what he didn't say was last years loss was also greater that all those airlines combined.......Spin, spin and more spin.
porch monkey is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2015, 11:34
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,290
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
It's easy to shut down trolls!

Just ignore their posts and continue the thread.
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2015, 13:50
  #50 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Talking

What's all the fuss about?

This message is hidden because Flyboat North is on your ignore list.
This message is hidden because BNEA320 is on your ignore list
Keg is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2015, 20:28
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Word on the street was QF got the 9's at a 50% discount.

Boeing must be really desperate to get someone to buy the 9's...

Ollie: Isnt most of the profit related to selling the terminal at SYD?
underfire is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2015, 22:03
  #52 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Qantas signed on for those aeroplanes in 2005! So yeah, Boeing were pretty desperate to get Qantas signature back then. I'm pretty sure such a discount wouldn't be forthcoming these days or for the 777X that we sign on for in a couple of years time.
Keg is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2015, 22:22
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Unfortunately not the Orient
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 88 Likes on 32 Posts
Under fire.

The terminal deal in Sydney is during this financial year, so will form part of next years profit announcement.
SandyPalms is online now  
Old 22nd Aug 2015, 21:00
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks, wasnt sure about that.

To me, it always seemed that QF gave up the best revenue routes that the 787 would be used for.

MEL to DFW in a 17 inch seat?
underfire is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.