Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Qantas announces a $975 million profit

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas announces a $975 million profit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Aug 2015, 23:46
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: PPrune nominee 2011!
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas announces a $975 million profit



http://www.news.com.au/video/id-BtND...million-profit


Interesting...
Skystar320 is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 00:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,439
Received 219 Likes on 75 Posts
So how about we have a bit of positivity now, we may not agree with the management of the airline, investment decisions etc but the group is now profitable with new aircraft coming to Qantas mainline which will bring new opportunities for many.

Regardless of who is in charge perhaps we have ahead of us now a few years of positive news and developments after the grind of the last few.
Ollie Onion is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 00:18
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 308
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Q&A session after announcement:
Transcript:
Alan Joyce - "Thank you for flying over from Perth, Geoffrey. I hope you got one of those new fantastic sleeper seats"

Geoffrey Thomas - " No, I got one of the old, not so fantastic....."

Alan Joyce -" Aaaaah. I should have lined that up first".

Geoffrey Thomas- "I was very disappointed".

Last edited by Captain Gidday; 20th Aug 2015 at 01:05.
Captain Gidday is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 00:25
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,283
Received 38 Likes on 29 Posts
The good old Australian whinge>>>

A freebee for Geoff and he still can't be happy...
TBM-Legend is online now  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 00:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Harbour Master Place
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No more snout in the trough for you Geoffrey after your "Great Wall" faux pas.
'I did not see Great Wall from space': Yang Liwei

China's first astronaut Yang Liwei said in an interview on the China Central Television Thursday evening that "I did not see the Great Wall from space."

China's first astronaut Yang Liwei said in an interview on the China Central Television Thursday evening that "I did not see the Great Wall from space."

However, he said the Earth looked "very beautiful."

There was a popular saying in China that the Great Wall was the only manmade architecture that could be sighted by naked eyes in space.
http://en.people.cn/200310/17/eng20031017_126232.shtml

I wonder how Liwei's career went after that comment.
CurtainTwitcher is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 01:38
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Doomagee
Age: 11
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Billion dollar profit. Sounds like a Game
Changer.
Berealgetreal is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 01:45
  #7 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Lightbulb

And a billion dollars worth of retired debt as well.
Keg is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 02:51
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,887
Likes: 0
Received 247 Likes on 107 Posts
After going to the brink of aviation oblivion a few years ago, Qantas has turned around it financial woes with a full year after-tax profit of $557 million.
As it's turned out, plummeting oil prices shaved $597 million off the airline's costs, far and away the biggest contributing factor to the turnaround.

The much vaunted transformation program, which resulted in the loss of thousands of jobs, certainly has delivered the goods in stripping out expenses, with operational costs falling $224 million. But that was less than half the savings on fuel.

In fact, without the fuel saving, the Flying Kangaroo would possibly still be in the red.
Source:Qantas swings back to $557m profit, announces $505m shareholder payment - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 04:11
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Western Pacific
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doesn't even cover half of last years loss, so they must still be in financial trouble, surely. Or is it all just paper pushing & manipulation of their employees, the shareholders & the general public?

Don't know what is real with business anymore. Maybe I am just getting too old & am not up with the times.
Oakape is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 04:25
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Oakape,

They made a billion and they paid a billion off in debt, albeit they've sold the farm to do so.

In future hard times there may not be much left to sell. However the balance sheet is looking healthier especially with the liability of HK gone.
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 05:21
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,631
Received 605 Likes on 173 Posts
I havn't the strength to read the dribble from Joyce however someone told me that he said the deal with pilots on the 787 was worth 30% to the company. I'm simple, only a pilot but some quick maths by me on a per pax cost to Lax of the 787 versus the 747 comes up with the following. It's not exact and feel free to correct me where I may be wrong in my assumptions. On a Syd Lax return pattern the 747 is approx 38 credits and 9 hours overtime the rates I use are from July 2017 on both types.Capt $301 per hour FO $198 SO $154 total $37,900. 370 seats cost per seat say $102.
787, Capt $318 per hour, FO $210 SO $111. Stick hours 31. Total cost $24,265
Now here's the difficult part, how many seats? United has 220 on the 789 so il use that and the per seat cost is $110. More than the current 747. If you go to 250 seats its $97 per seat. However the crewing costs are for year 1 crew on the 787 as against year 12 on the 747. After 4 years the 787 crewing costs have increased by about 7% while the 747 hasn't.
Long winded I know. However what I'm trying to get across is that I don't think the company's saving will be as great as they think.
dragon man is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 05:40
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: AUS
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"However what I'm trying to get across is that I don't think the company's saving will be as great as they think."

Agreed. Most likely just trying to big-note themselves and put pressure on other unions. Good to see some mainline growth and the first new-type widebody order in 15 years though.
Tuner 2 is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 05:51
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: act
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't AJ's term coming to an end soon? Isn't it always funny how a company's profitability and future take a dramatic turn for the better as their term comes to a close? At the time his bonuses etc that are all based on the company's performance, are about to be calculated? Coincidence?
Vref+5 is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 06:06
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Sydney
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't AJ's term coming to an end soon? Isn't it always funny how a company's profitability and future take a dramatic turn for the better as their term comes to a close? At the time his bonuses etc that are all based on the company's performance, are about to be calculated? Coincidence?
AJ, no. Clifford, however, is likely to go soon. I'd say Clifford will go in the next year or so and have time in the seat before installing a new CEO of his choosing. For AJ to go first would require as new chairman to put up with a new CEO chosen by the chairman he replaced. Not ideal.
IsDon is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 07:30
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Western Pacific
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They made a billion and they paid a billion off in debt
Ok, but they lost 2.8 billion last year. How have they covered that? Or was it not really lost & it was just an imaginary figure that a bit of creative accounting came up with?
Oakape is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 07:41
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: goulburn
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't AJ's term coming to an end soon? Isn't it always funny how a company's profitability and future take a dramatic turn for the better as their term comes to a close? At the time his bonuses etc that are all based on the company's performance, are about to be calculated? Coincidence?

And just to back that up, check the number of companies where this happens and the first thing the new CEO does are writeoffs/write downs to clear the decks.That happens for two reasons, firstly to correct the financial manipulation of the outgoing to maximise bonuses, secondly to set up future super profits for themselves when they can be held to account and start the cycle all over again.

Dont know about anyone else, but why isnt this called for what it is???

QF is no different manipulate losses and bad news and then miraculously fix it all and set the angels loose in the media to spin the world. I wish these smartest guys in the room would just go away.
ohallen is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 07:43
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good on you Alan, well done mate
Captahab is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 11:31
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: S33E151
Posts: 1,086
Received 59 Likes on 29 Posts
Dunno how to post this any other way, but this is an analysts view of Slater & Gordon share price and 'red flags' that should be noted. I see similarities - but who am I to know?


http://michaelsmithnews.typepad.com/...865a5c3970d-pi

Of course it would be nice to have 'proper' QF/J*accounts to base an opinion on ...
V-Jet is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 21:41
  #19 (permalink)  
34R
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brisbane
Age: 52
Posts: 238
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just think what the profit might have been if that much needed government assistance was sent their way!
34R is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2015, 00:06
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,631
Received 605 Likes on 173 Posts
$55 million injection into Jetstar Japan, however it will soon be profitable. Have we heard this record before?
dragon man is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.