Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Qantas A380 grounded in Los Angeles after mystery problem with hydraulics

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas A380 grounded in Los Angeles after mystery problem with hydraulics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Jul 2015, 05:16
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Melbourne
Age: 37
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Get over it guys, Emirates for one seem pretty happy with theirs!!

At the end of the day while many of you would love Qantas to have 777s or 747/800s, its the passengers who pay the bills, and they love the 380, particularly the ones that generate big revenue, Business Class.
The 777 nor the 777x can compete with the 380s upper deck Business Class and dedicated aerobridge!
I have no doubt one of main reasons Qantas continues to perform well across the Pacific, is because they are the only Airline flying the 380.
westjet is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2015, 06:29
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lean Sigma
As the man said.....Oils ain't oils sol....
haha, maybe that's the problem.

I know my late model Toyota engine was extremely unhappy when the local mechanic put Valvoline in it, instead of Toyota's recommended Castrol.

Luckily no permanent damage was done, and it went back to normal when I had him replace it with Castrol.

fwiw, that mechanic has now gone out of business.
p.j.m is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2015, 06:37
  #23 (permalink)  
TWT
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: troposphere
Posts: 831
Received 34 Likes on 19 Posts
Probably the wrong spec oil,rather than a different brand that made that happen.
TWT is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2015, 08:30
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 356
Received 115 Likes on 46 Posts
An A380 with a funny 6*** flight number arrived into YSSY from the North East the other night at FL420. Must have been empty to be that high!!!
Probably was fairly light on that occasion, however FL420 is easily achievable even with a reasonable load.

FL 420 can be comfortably and efficiently achieved at 380T and ISA+10, so with a ZFW of say 345T (400 pax or thereabouts) that would be doable 2 hours or so from destination if desired.
C441 is online now  
Old 1st Jul 2015, 09:33
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Casablanca
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A380 = heap of ****.
Sand dune Sam is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2015, 10:06
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: FL290
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
A380 = heap of ****.
The next 8 we get will be far better. The problem still remains that we need to be able to fill all the seats
1a sound asleep is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2015, 12:02
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,469
Received 310 Likes on 116 Posts
So without your Boeing only attitudes, explain in factual terms why A380 = heap of ****.

Otherwise, your argument is invalid and worthless and nothing more than a "I hate Airbus because I fly a 737" rant.

From a pax point of view, give me an A380 over a 747 any day. Smoother, quieter, more comfortable.

morno
morno is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2015, 13:08
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: S33E151
Posts: 1,086
Received 59 Likes on 29 Posts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuo4Xotcvns&sns=em


Thank God for International Rescue!

B744 part played in this episode by Thunderbird 2.

All references to persons and aircraft either living or dead are not intentional.
V-Jet is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2015, 23:08
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Get over it guys, Emirates for one seem pretty happy with theirs!!
They may be happy with the aircraft but not so happy with the engines - have ordered the next tranche with RR and asked Airbus if it's possible to re-engine the current ones.

The passengers may love the aircraft but if the airlines can't make money with it (because of high fuel burn/weight issues) then it's not a good aircraft.

1a sound asleep, you'll have to give up on your wishful thinking - the International CEO has stated that QF won't be taking delivery of any more A380's.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2015, 23:59
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,936
Received 393 Likes on 208 Posts
A380 = heap of ****
As a pax who travels in steerage I find the 380 the best of anything else on offer. Appreciate that those who fix/fly may have different opinions.
megan is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2015, 02:18
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Doomadgee
Posts: 281
Received 47 Likes on 25 Posts
Going Boeing - (the name says it all)

Emirates are making a sh.t ton of profit - so the 62 380s (with a total of 140 ordered) can't be hurting the bottom line too much.

The EA engines on the first ones performed exactly as promised. In fact better than promised. Emirates have switched engine manufacturers because RR are promising even better performance in their next gen of donks. It's called evolution.
Capn Rex Havoc is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2015, 04:56
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Rex, I think you misinterpreted me. I didn't sat that EK were unhappy with the aircraft and that they weren't making money with them, it's just the engines that they aren't happy with. It's been public for a while now that EK asked Airbus to develop a NEO version to reduce the fuel burn and after signing with RR for the next tranche, they asked if it was possible to retrofit the existing fleet (not feasible).

EK have an advantage with the price of fuel in DXB that helps make the A380 operations profitable but other A380 operators are finding it more difficult, especially on longer sectors.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2015, 06:59
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Doomadgee
Posts: 281
Received 47 Likes on 25 Posts
Going Boeing - The fuel advantage chestnut is rubbish. Please provide evidence that EK gets cheaper fuel than Qantas.
And of course they are always going to push for more efficient donks. It does not mean they are unhappy with the ones they have, they want to get more profit from up and coming design improvements. Every airline wants that.
Capn Rex Havoc is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2015, 07:27
  #34 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,175
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
Goeing Boeing,

I was of the understanding that the Jet fuel in Dubai is mainly imported from Singapore, and more expensive than fuel in Singapore.

Where are your numbers coming from ?
swh is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2015, 08:00
  #35 (permalink)  
TWT
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: troposphere
Posts: 831
Received 34 Likes on 19 Posts
Tim Clark from EK says they are not subsidised and pay market rates for fuel worldwide :

http://www.emirates.com/english/imag...233-845771.pdf
TWT is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2015, 08:35
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: FL290
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Tim Clark from EK says they are not subsidised and pay market rates for fuel worldwide :
And they buy 55% of their fuel in DXB where they get a very very very substantial bulk discount
1a sound asleep is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2015, 08:55
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
I don't know exact details of DXB pricing but a pilot for Qatar Airways told me that they often plan via DXB and uplift as much fuel as possible because it's significantly cheaper than in Doha.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2015, 09:17
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Land of everlasting thirst
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Going Boeing, EK does the same.
The fuel prices are monitored on a daily basis and flight plans are designed to tanker, taking in account the cost to carry that extra fuel. This is mainly done on the A330's and B777's bouncing around the 2-4 four sectors.
I have tankered fuel from Tehran, Kuwait and Doha in the past as well.
kumul1 is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2015, 09:23
  #39 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,175
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
Goring Boeing,

Just looked up the price in DXB, it is the same as ZRH, BAH, DFW, IAH, IAD, ORD,CPT, BOM, NRT, AMS.

Price in DOH is about 10 cents more per gallon, same price as JNB, PEK, CGK, NGO, BKK, FRA, MAD.

IST, LGW, ICN, SGN are around 10 cents cheaper per gallon than DXB.

LHR, KUL, CDG are around 30 cents cheaper per gallon than DXB.

YYC, SIN are around 40 cents cheaper per gallon than DXB.
swh is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2015, 09:39
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,991
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Ok but who pays that price?
ACMS is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.